Cancer cytogenetics in a genomics world: Wedding the old with the new.

Chromosome analysis Complex karyotypes FISH Karyotyping Leukemia

Journal

Blood reviews
ISSN: 1532-1681
Titre abrégé: Blood Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8708558

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 May 2024
Historique:
received: 15 03 2024
revised: 30 04 2024
accepted: 02 05 2024
medline: 9 6 2024
pubmed: 9 6 2024
entrez: 9 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Since the discovery of the Philadelphia chromosome in 1960, cytogenetic studies have been instrumental in detecting chromosomal abnormalities that can inform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and risk assessment efforts. The initial expansion of cancer cytogenetics was with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to assess submicroscopic alterations in dividing or non-dividing cells and has grown into the incorporation of chromosomal microarrays (CMA), and next generation sequencing (NGS). These molecular technologies add additional dimensions to the genomic assessment of cancers by uncovering cytogenetically invisible molecular markers. Rapid technological and bioinformatic advances in NGS are so promising that the idea of performing whole genome sequencing as part of routine patient care may soon become economically and logistically feasible. However, for now cytogenetic studies continue to play a major role in the diagnostic testing and subsequent assessments in leukemia with other genomic studies serving as complementary testing options for detection of actionable genomic abnormalities. In this review, we discuss the role of conventional cytogenetics (karyotyping, chromosome analysis) and FISH studies in hematological malignancies, highlighting the continued clinical utility of these techniques, the subtleties and complexities that are relevant to treating physicians and the unique strengths of cytogenetics that cannot yet be paralleled by the current high-throughput molecular technologies. Additionally, we describe how CMA, optical genome mapping (OGM), and NGS detect abnormalities that were beyond the capacity of cytogenetic studies and how an integrated approach (broad molecular testing) can contribute to the detection of actionable targets and variants in malignancies. Finally, we discuss advances in the field of genomic testing that are bridging the advantages of individual (single) cell based cytogenetic testing and broad genomic testing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38852016
pii: S0268-960X(24)00042-0
doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2024.101209
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101209

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Jorune Balciuniene (J)

Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Yi Ning (Y)

Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Hillard M Lazarus (HM)

Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.

Vania Aikawa (V)

Division of Precision and Computational Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Sarina Sherpa (S)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Yanming Zhang (Y)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Jennifer J D Morrissette (JJD)

Division of Precision and Computational Diagnostics, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: jemorris@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Classifications MeSH