New Strategy for Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Treatment by Endermology: ELOCS Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema Endermology Intensive decongestive treatment Lymphology Supportive care

Journal

Clinical breast cancer
ISSN: 1938-0666
Titre abrégé: Clin Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898731

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 May 2024
Historique:
received: 10 12 2023
revised: 05 05 2024
accepted: 18 05 2024
medline: 10 6 2024
pubmed: 10 6 2024
entrez: 9 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This phase II trial sought to be the first of its kind to estimate the success rate of endermology in reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema. ELOCS is a French, monocentric, randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients were randomized to receive the following over a 5-day treatment period: standard intensive decongestant treatment (IDT) (bandages and manual lymphatic drainage MLD) (group 1); IDT including bandages, MLD, and Cellu M6 (group 2); and IDT including bandages and Cellu M6 (Group 3). The main endpoint was the success rate in each group, (reduction of at least 30% in the excess volume). We estimated that endermology treatment (groups 2 and 3) would be of interest successes occurred in at least 21 out of 31 patients. A total of 93 patients were included (31 patients in each of the 3 groups). The median age was 64.5 years (IQR: [56.4-71.3]). Patients were treated with mastectomy (n = 35), axillary lymphadenectomy (n = 80), radiotherapy (n = 91), and chemotherapy (n = 68). The mean relative reduction in excess volume was 38% in group 1, 33% in group 2, and 34% in group 3. Success rate was 58.1% in group 1 (18/31, P = ,0237), 51.6% (16/31, P = ,5) in group 2, and 64.5% (20/31, P = ,075) in group 3. In the LPG groups (2 and 3), 10/62 (16%) patients found LPG painful and 9/62 (15%) patients considered it to be unpleasant. Even though the critical threshold of 21 successes was not met, this study was the first to validate a standardized and reproducible endermology protocol.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This phase II trial sought to be the first of its kind to estimate the success rate of endermology in reducing breast cancer-related lymphedema.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
ELOCS is a French, monocentric, randomized, open-label phase II trial. Patients were randomized to receive the following over a 5-day treatment period: standard intensive decongestant treatment (IDT) (bandages and manual lymphatic drainage MLD) (group 1); IDT including bandages, MLD, and Cellu M6 (group 2); and IDT including bandages and Cellu M6 (Group 3). The main endpoint was the success rate in each group, (reduction of at least 30% in the excess volume). We estimated that endermology treatment (groups 2 and 3) would be of interest successes occurred in at least 21 out of 31 patients.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 93 patients were included (31 patients in each of the 3 groups). The median age was 64.5 years (IQR: [56.4-71.3]). Patients were treated with mastectomy (n = 35), axillary lymphadenectomy (n = 80), radiotherapy (n = 91), and chemotherapy (n = 68). The mean relative reduction in excess volume was 38% in group 1, 33% in group 2, and 34% in group 3. Success rate was 58.1% in group 1 (18/31, P = ,0237), 51.6% (16/31, P = ,5) in group 2, and 64.5% (20/31, P = ,075) in group 3. In the LPG groups (2 and 3), 10/62 (16%) patients found LPG painful and 9/62 (15%) patients considered it to be unpleasant.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Even though the critical threshold of 21 successes was not met, this study was the first to validate a standardized and reproducible endermology protocol.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38853038
pii: S1526-8209(24)00122-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article. Publication is approved by all authors and the responsible authorities of the CHU Rangueil.

Auteurs

Julie Malloizel-Delaunay (J)

Vascular Medicine Department, University Hospital Center - Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Ariane Weyl (A)

Department of Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Center - Toulouse, Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopole, Toulouse Cedex 9, France. Electronic address: weyl.a@chu-toulouse.fr.

Clara Brusq (C)

Clinical Research Methodological Support Unit (USMR, Unité de Support Méthodologique à la Recherche), Toulouse University Hospital Center - Toulouse, Toulouse Cedex 9.

Benoît Chaput (B)

Plastic Surgery Department, University Hospital Center - Toulouse, Toulouse, France.

Barbara Garmy-Susini (B)

I2MC INSERM UMR 1048, University Hospital Center - Toulouse -Rangueil, 1 avenue du Professeur Jean Poulhès, 31403 Toulouse, France.

Vanina Bongard (V)

Clinical Research Methodological Support Unit (USMR, Unité de Support Méthodologique à la Recherche), Toulouse University Hospital Center - Toulouse, Toulouse Cedex 9.

Charlotte Vaysse (C)

Department of Oncological Surgery, University Hospital Center - Toulouse, Toulouse University Cancer Institute - Oncopole, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.

Classifications MeSH