Christian anthropology-based contributions to the ethics of socially assistive robots in care for older adults.

anthropology digitalization ethics older adults religion robotics

Journal

Bioethics
ISSN: 1467-8519
Titre abrégé: Bioethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704792

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised: 28 02 2024
received: 28 08 2023
accepted: 11 05 2024
medline: 10 6 2024
pubmed: 10 6 2024
entrez: 10 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Our society, in general, and health care, in particular, faces notable challenges due to the emergence of innovative digital technologies. The use of socially assistive robots in aged care is a particular digital application that provokes ethical reflection. The answers we give to the ethical questions associated with socially assistive robots are framed by ontological and anthropological considerations of what constitutes human beings and how the meaning of being human relates to how these robots are conceived. Religious beliefs and secular worldviews, each of which may participate fully in pluralist societies, have an important responsibility in this foundational debate, as anthropological theories can be inspired by religious and secular viewpoints. This article identifies seven anthropological considerations grounded in the synthesis of biblical scriptures, Roman Catholic documents, and recent research literature. We highlight the inspirational quality of these anthropological considerations when dealing with ethical issues regarding the development and use of socially assistive robots in aged care. With this contribution, we aim to foster a global and inclusive dialogue on digitalization in aged care that deeply challenges our basic understanding of what constitutes a human being and how this notion relates to machine artefacts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38857488
doi: 10.1111/bioe.13322
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

Chris Gastmans (C)

Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Edoardo Sinibaldi (E)

Centre for Convergent Technologies, Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy.

Richard Lerner (R)

Institute of Applied Research in Youth Development, Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.

Miguel Yáñez (M)

Department of Moral Theology, Gregorian University, Rome, Italy.

László Kovács (L)

Department of Applied Ethics, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Augsburg, Germany.

Laura Palazzani (L)

Department of Jurisprudence, Economics, Politics, and Modern Languages, Faculty of Law, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy.

Renzo Pegoraro (R)

Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican City, Italy.

Tijs Vandemeulebroucke (T)

Sustainable AI Lab, Institute for Science and Ethics, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany.

Classifications MeSH