Evaluation of wear resistance and surface properties of 3D printed restorative dental materials.

3D-printing CoF roughness three-body-wear two-body-wear vertical loss

Journal

Journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1879-176X
Titre abrégé: J Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0354422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 22 02 2024
revised: 05 06 2024
accepted: 07 06 2024
medline: 11 6 2024
pubmed: 11 6 2024
entrez: 10 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate the wear resistance of three 3D-printed dental crown materials (NextDent C&B MFH, Saremco print CROWNTEC and Bego VarseoSmile Crown) under two environmental conditions (dry and artificial saliva), two loads (49N and 70N) and two surface treatments (polished and glazed). A total of 120 samples were divided into 24 groups and tested for wear under two loads (49N and 70N), surface treatment (polished or glazed), and environment (dry or submerged in artificial saliva). All samples underwent reciprocating wear testing at 1Hz using a wear simulator, replicating 48 months of In Vivo conditions with a stainless-steel ball as the antagonist. The coefficient of friction (CoF), surface roughness, volumetric and vertical wear loss were measured and statistically analysed. Confocal microscopy assessed the surface properties of crown materials and the antagonists. The NextDent material demonstrated the most homogenous wear, with relatively low vertical and volumetric loss across all groups (p < 0.004). NextDent and Bego materials performed similarly in artificial saliva regardless of the load type (p > 1.000). The CoF remained below 0.3 for all groups. All groups exhibited significant increases in surface roughness after testing, however, this did not correlate with an increase in the CoF. Confocal analysis revealed material deformities due to load and notable scratch marks on the stainless-steel antagonists. It was found that all investigated 3D-printed materials can be suggested for provisional use. Both vertical loss and volumetric loss results should be included for material evaluation. CoF and surface roughness should be implemented into wear evaluation. This study highlights the practical value of 3D-printed dental crown materials, particularly for provisional restorations. However, their extended use requires careful consideration of individual patient needs, emphasising the need for judicious clinical application evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38857647
pii: S0300-5712(24)00289-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105120
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105120

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in the paper.

Auteurs

Anastasiia Grymak (A)

Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago. Electronic address: ana.grymak@postgrad.otago.ac.nz.

John M Aarts (JM)

Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago.

Andrew Cameron (A)

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Australia; Member Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Australia.

Joanne Jung Eun Choi (JJE)

Faculty of Dentistry, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, University of Otago.

Classifications MeSH