Working with patients' treatment expectations - what we can learn from homeopathy.

evidence-based medicine globules homeopathy placebo treatment expectation

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 11 03 2024
accepted: 13 05 2024
medline: 11 6 2024
pubmed: 11 6 2024
entrez: 11 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The usual homeopathic remedy, "globules," does not contain any pharmacologically active ingredient. However, many patients and practitioners report beneficial effects of homeopathic treatment on various health outcomes. Experimental and clinical research of the last two decades analyzing the underlying mechanisms of the placebo effect could explain this phenomenon, with patients' treatment expectations as the predominant mechanism. Treatment expectations can be optimized through various factors, such as prior information, communication, and treatment context. This narrative review analyses how homeopathy successfully utilizes these factors. Subsequently, it is discussed what evidence-based medicine could learn from homeopathic practice to optimize treatment expectations (e.g., using an empathic, patient-centered communication style, deliberately selecting objects in practice rooms, or using clear treatment rituals and salient contextual stimuli) and thereby treatment effectiveness. Homeopathic remedy does not work beyond the placebo effect but is recommended or prescribed as an active treatment by those who believe in it. Thus, practitioners need to understand the manner in which homeopathy (as an example of inert treatment) works and are advised to reintegrate its underlying effective placebo mechanisms into evidence-based medicine. This promises to increase treatment efficacy, tolerability, satisfaction, and compliance with evidence-based treatments, and addresses the desires patients are trying to satisfy in homeopathy in an ethical, fully informed way that is grounded in evidence-based medicine.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38860049
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1398865
pmc: PMC11163137
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1398865

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wilhelm, Hermann, Rief, Schedlowski, Bingel and Winkler.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Marcel Wilhelm (M)

Department of Clinical Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Christiane Hermann (C)

Department of Clinical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Winfried Rief (W)

Department of Clinical Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Manfred Schedlowski (M)

Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Clinic Essen, Essen, Germany.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Ulrike Bingel (U)

Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.
Translational Pain Research Unit, University Medicine Essen, Essen, Germany.

Alexander Winkler (A)

Department of Clinical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH