Validation of the French version of the Munich ChronoType questionnaire and associations between chronotype and physiological parameters.

Chronotype behaviour physiology questionnaire validation

Journal

Chronobiology international
ISSN: 1525-6073
Titre abrégé: Chronobiol Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8501362

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 11 6 2024
pubmed: 11 6 2024
entrez: 11 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Assessing chronotype is essential in clinical and research environments, but the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ), a widely utilised tool, is not available in French. Therefore, we carried out an observational monocentric study to validate the French MCTQ against the sleep diary for sleep schedules, the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) for chronotype, and polysomnography measures. We utilised the mid-sleep point on free days (MSF), adjusted for sleep debt (MSFsc), to gauge morningness/eveningness. The study included 80 participants (average age: 40.9 years, 50% female). The sleep schedules determined by the MCTQ and the sleep diary showed a high correlation. The MSFsc demonstrated a significant correlation with the MEQ, persisting even under sleep constraints such as an alarm on free days. The predictive accuracy was strong for a morning chronotype and moderate for an evening chronotype as assessed using the MEQ. In summary, the French MCTQ is a reliable tool for researchers and clinicians for assessing sleep schedules and chronotype in French-speaking populations. The MSFsc can effectively predict chronotype, even under sleep constraints. However, for the evening chronotype, self-assessment appears to be more accurate. The association with polysomnography measures enriches our understanding of the chronotype at the intersection of behaviour and physiology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38860541
doi: 10.1080/07420528.2024.2362309
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Auteurs

Julien Coelho (J)

SANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Hôpital Pellegrin, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Service Universitaire de Médecine du Sommeil, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Jean-Arthur Micoulaud-Franchi (JA)

SANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Hôpital Pellegrin, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Service Universitaire de Médecine du Sommeil, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Emmanuel D'incau (E)

SANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Hôpital Pellegrin, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Service Universitaire de Médecine du Sommeil, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Patrice Bourgin (P)

CIRCSom (International Research Center for ChronoSomnology) & Sleep Disorders Center, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Institute for Cellular and Integrative Neurosciences, CNRS UPR 3212 & Strasbourg University, Strasbourg, France.

Claude Gronfier (C)

Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (CRNL), Neurocampus, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Damien Leger (D)

Université Paris Cité, VIFASOM (Vigilance Fatigue Sommeil et santé publique ERC 7330), Paris, France.
APHP, Hôtel-Dieu, Centre du Sommeil et de la Vigilance, CRPPE Sommeil Vigilance et Travail, Paris, France.

Paul Galvez (P)

Service Universitaire de Médecine du Sommeil, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Pierre Philip (P)

SANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Hôpital Pellegrin, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Service Universitaire de Médecine du Sommeil, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Jacques Taillard (J)

SANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Hôpital Pellegrin, University Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Classifications MeSH