BioFire blood culture identification 2 panel as detector of bacteria in peritoneal fluid from patients with acute appendicitis.


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 12 12 2023
revised: 04 04 2024
accepted: 22 04 2024
medline: 12 6 2024
pubmed: 12 6 2024
entrez: 11 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Polymerase chain reaction is a method to detect bacterial DNA and is widely used because it delivers results within a few hours with the potential to guide postoperative antibiotic treatment. This study aims to determine if polymerase chain reaction can accurately detect bacteria in the peritoneal fluid compared with conventional culture from patients operated for acute appendicitis. This prospective cohort study included patients above the age of 18 years who underwent laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Peritoneal samples were collected before the appendectomy procedure for conventional culture and polymerase chain reaction using the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for comparison. During surgery, the surgeon assessed the appendicitis as either complicated or noncomplicated. Samples from 102 patients were eligible for analysis. Twelve samples were polymerase chain reaction positive, and 14 samples were culture positive. The concordance of positive results when comparing these 2 methods was 71.4%. The most commonly found bacteria were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Of the 36 patients with complicated appendicitis, no bacteria were detected by either conventional culture or polymerase chain reaction in 21 (58%) of the patients. In patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, bacteria were demonstrated in 1 out of 66 (2%) patients. This study suggests that polymerase chain reaction can be used to detect bacteria in the peritoneal fluid and has the potential to guide postoperative antibiotic treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Polymerase chain reaction is a method to detect bacterial DNA and is widely used because it delivers results within a few hours with the potential to guide postoperative antibiotic treatment. This study aims to determine if polymerase chain reaction can accurately detect bacteria in the peritoneal fluid compared with conventional culture from patients operated for acute appendicitis.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective cohort study included patients above the age of 18 years who underwent laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Peritoneal samples were collected before the appendectomy procedure for conventional culture and polymerase chain reaction using the BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel for comparison. During surgery, the surgeon assessed the appendicitis as either complicated or noncomplicated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Samples from 102 patients were eligible for analysis. Twelve samples were polymerase chain reaction positive, and 14 samples were culture positive. The concordance of positive results when comparing these 2 methods was 71.4%. The most commonly found bacteria were Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. Of the 36 patients with complicated appendicitis, no bacteria were detected by either conventional culture or polymerase chain reaction in 21 (58%) of the patients. In patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, bacteria were demonstrated in 1 out of 66 (2%) patients.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that polymerase chain reaction can be used to detect bacteria in the peritoneal fluid and has the potential to guide postoperative antibiotic treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38862277
pii: S0039-6060(24)00282-4
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.030
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Zahraa Chayed (Z)

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Electronic address: zahraachayed@gmail.com.

Ditte Bro Sørensen (D)

Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

Ulrik Stenz Justesen (U)

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

Mark Bremholm Ellebæk (M)

Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Niels Qvist (N)

Research Unit for Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH