Genomic Determinants Associated with Modes of Progression and Patterns of Failure in Metachronous Oligometastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Metastasis-directed therapy Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer Patterns of failure

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 17 02 2024
revised: 24 03 2024
accepted: 21 05 2024
medline: 12 6 2024
pubmed: 12 6 2024
entrez: 11 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents an early state in the progression of metastatic disease for which patients experience better outcomes in comparison to those with higher disease burden. Despite the generally more indolent nature, there is still much heterogeneity, with some patients experiencing a more aggressive clinical course unexplained by clinical features alone. Our aim was to investigate correlation of tumor genomics with the mode of progression (MOP) and pattern of failure (POF) following first treatment (metastasis-directed and/or systemic therapy) for omCSPC. We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of men treated for metachronous omCSPC who underwent tumor next-generation sequencing with at least 1 yr of follow-up after their first treatment. Descriptive MOP and POF results are reported with respect to the presence of genomic alterations in pathways of interest. MOP was defined as class I, long-term control (LTC; no radiographic progression at last follow-up), class II, oligoprogression (1-3 lesions), or class III, polyprogression (≥4 lesions). POF included the location of lesions at first failure. Genomic pathways of interest included TP53, ATM, RB1, BRCA1/2, SPOP, and WNT (APC, CTNNB1, RNF43). Genomic associations with MOP/POF were compared using χ We included 267 patients in our analysis; the majority had either one (47%) or two (30%) metastatic lesions at oligometastasis. The 3-yr OS rate was significantly associated with MOP (71% for polyprogression vs 91% for oligoprogression; p = 0.005). TP53 mutation was associated with a significantly lower LTC rate (27.6% vs 42.3%; p = 0.04) and RB1 mutation was associated with a high rate of polyprogression (50% vs 19.9%; p = 0.022). Regarding POF, bone failure was significantly more common with tumors harboring TP53 mutations (44.8% vs25.9%; p = 0.005) and less common with SPOP mutations (7.1% vs 31.4%; p = 0.007). Visceral failure was more common with tumors harboring either WNT pathway mutations (17.2% vs 6.8%, p = 0.05) or SPOP mutations (17.9% vs 6.3%; p = 0.04). Finally, visceral and bone failures were associated with distinct gene-expression profiles. Tumor genomics provides novel insight into MOP and POF following treatment for metachronous omCSPC. Patients with TP53 and RB1 mutations have a higher likelihood of progression, and TP53, SPOP, and WNT pathway mutations may have a role in metastatic organotropism. We evaluated cancer progression after a first treatment for metastatic prostate cancer with up to five metastases. We found that mutations in certain genes were associated with the location and extent of further metastasis in these patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC) represents an early state in the progression of metastatic disease for which patients experience better outcomes in comparison to those with higher disease burden. Despite the generally more indolent nature, there is still much heterogeneity, with some patients experiencing a more aggressive clinical course unexplained by clinical features alone. Our aim was to investigate correlation of tumor genomics with the mode of progression (MOP) and pattern of failure (POF) following first treatment (metastasis-directed and/or systemic therapy) for omCSPC.
METHODS METHODS
We performed an international multi-institutional retrospective study of men treated for metachronous omCSPC who underwent tumor next-generation sequencing with at least 1 yr of follow-up after their first treatment. Descriptive MOP and POF results are reported with respect to the presence of genomic alterations in pathways of interest. MOP was defined as class I, long-term control (LTC; no radiographic progression at last follow-up), class II, oligoprogression (1-3 lesions), or class III, polyprogression (≥4 lesions). POF included the location of lesions at first failure. Genomic pathways of interest included TP53, ATM, RB1, BRCA1/2, SPOP, and WNT (APC, CTNNB1, RNF43). Genomic associations with MOP/POF were compared using χ
KEY FINDINGS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS UNASSIGNED
We included 267 patients in our analysis; the majority had either one (47%) or two (30%) metastatic lesions at oligometastasis. The 3-yr OS rate was significantly associated with MOP (71% for polyprogression vs 91% for oligoprogression; p = 0.005). TP53 mutation was associated with a significantly lower LTC rate (27.6% vs 42.3%; p = 0.04) and RB1 mutation was associated with a high rate of polyprogression (50% vs 19.9%; p = 0.022). Regarding POF, bone failure was significantly more common with tumors harboring TP53 mutations (44.8% vs25.9%; p = 0.005) and less common with SPOP mutations (7.1% vs 31.4%; p = 0.007). Visceral failure was more common with tumors harboring either WNT pathway mutations (17.2% vs 6.8%, p = 0.05) or SPOP mutations (17.9% vs 6.3%; p = 0.04). Finally, visceral and bone failures were associated with distinct gene-expression profiles.
CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Tumor genomics provides novel insight into MOP and POF following treatment for metachronous omCSPC. Patients with TP53 and RB1 mutations have a higher likelihood of progression, and TP53, SPOP, and WNT pathway mutations may have a role in metastatic organotropism.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
We evaluated cancer progression after a first treatment for metastatic prostate cancer with up to five metastases. We found that mutations in certain genes were associated with the location and extent of further metastasis in these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38862340
pii: S2588-9311(24)00142-1
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.05.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Philip Sutera (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Yang Song (Y)

Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Amol C Shetty (AC)

Institute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Keara English (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Kim Van der Eecken (K)

Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Ozan Cem Guler (OC)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Turkey.

Jarey Wang (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Yufeng Cao (Y)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Soha Bazyar (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Sofie Verbeke (S)

Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Jo Van Dorpe (J)

Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Valérie Fonteyne (V)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Bram De Laere (B)

Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Antwerp, Belgium.

Mark Mishra (M)

Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Zaker Rana (Z)

Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Jason Molitoris (J)

Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Matthew Ferris (M)

Department of Pathology and Human Structure and Repair, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Ana Kiess (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Daniel Y Song (DY)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Theodore DeWeese (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Kenneth J Pienta (KJ)

Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Christopher Barbieri (C)

Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Luigi Marchionni (L)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Lei Ren (L)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Amit Sawant (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Nicole Simone (N)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Alejandro Berlin (A)

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Cem Onal (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Adana, Turkey.

Phuoc T Tran (PT)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: phuoc.tran@som.umaryland.edu.

Piet Ost (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: piet.ost@ugent.be.

Matthew P Deek (MP)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. Electronic address: matthewdeek@gmail.com.

Classifications MeSH