Transcriptomics analysis reveals molecular alterations underpinning spaceflight dermatology.
Journal
Communications medicine
ISSN: 2730-664X
Titre abrégé: Commun Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918250414506676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
11
01
2023
accepted:
23
05
2024
medline:
12
6
2024
pubmed:
12
6
2024
entrez:
11
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Spaceflight poses a unique set of challenges to humans and the hostile spaceflight environment can induce a wide range of increased health risks, including dermatological issues. The biology driving the frequency of skin issues in astronauts is currently not well understood. To address this issue, we used a systems biology approach utilizing NASA's Open Science Data Repository (OSDR) on space flown murine transcriptomic datasets focused on the skin, biochemical profiles of 50 NASA astronauts and human transcriptomic datasets generated from blood and hair samples of JAXA astronauts, as well as blood samples obtained from the NASA Twins Study, and skin and blood samples from the first civilian commercial mission, Inspiration4. Key biological changes related to skin health, DNA damage & repair, and mitochondrial dysregulation are identified as potential drivers for skin health risks during spaceflight. Additionally, a machine learning model is utilized to determine gene pairings associated with spaceflight response in the skin. While we identified spaceflight-induced dysregulation, such as alterations in genes associated with skin barrier function and collagen formation, our results also highlight the remarkable ability for organisms to re-adapt back to Earth via post-flight re-tuning of gene expression. Our findings can guide future research on developing countermeasures for mitigating spaceflight-associated skin damage. Spaceflight is a hostile environment which can lead to health problems in astronauts, including in the skin. It is not currently well understood why these skin problems occur. Here, we analyzed data from the skin of space flown mice and astronauts to try and identify possible explanations for these skin problems. It appears that changes in the activation of genes related to damage to DNA, skin barrier health, and mitochondria (the energy-producing parts of cells) may play a role in these skin problems. Further research will be needed to confirm exactly how these changes influence skin health, which could lead to solutions for preventing and managing such issues in astronauts.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Spaceflight poses a unique set of challenges to humans and the hostile spaceflight environment can induce a wide range of increased health risks, including dermatological issues. The biology driving the frequency of skin issues in astronauts is currently not well understood.
METHODS
METHODS
To address this issue, we used a systems biology approach utilizing NASA's Open Science Data Repository (OSDR) on space flown murine transcriptomic datasets focused on the skin, biochemical profiles of 50 NASA astronauts and human transcriptomic datasets generated from blood and hair samples of JAXA astronauts, as well as blood samples obtained from the NASA Twins Study, and skin and blood samples from the first civilian commercial mission, Inspiration4.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Key biological changes related to skin health, DNA damage & repair, and mitochondrial dysregulation are identified as potential drivers for skin health risks during spaceflight. Additionally, a machine learning model is utilized to determine gene pairings associated with spaceflight response in the skin. While we identified spaceflight-induced dysregulation, such as alterations in genes associated with skin barrier function and collagen formation, our results also highlight the remarkable ability for organisms to re-adapt back to Earth via post-flight re-tuning of gene expression.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings can guide future research on developing countermeasures for mitigating spaceflight-associated skin damage.
Spaceflight is a hostile environment which can lead to health problems in astronauts, including in the skin. It is not currently well understood why these skin problems occur. Here, we analyzed data from the skin of space flown mice and astronauts to try and identify possible explanations for these skin problems. It appears that changes in the activation of genes related to damage to DNA, skin barrier health, and mitochondria (the energy-producing parts of cells) may play a role in these skin problems. Further research will be needed to confirm exactly how these changes influence skin health, which could lead to solutions for preventing and managing such issues in astronauts.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Spaceflight is a hostile environment which can lead to health problems in astronauts, including in the skin. It is not currently well understood why these skin problems occur. Here, we analyzed data from the skin of space flown mice and astronauts to try and identify possible explanations for these skin problems. It appears that changes in the activation of genes related to damage to DNA, skin barrier health, and mitochondria (the energy-producing parts of cells) may play a role in these skin problems. Further research will be needed to confirm exactly how these changes influence skin health, which could lead to solutions for preventing and managing such issues in astronauts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38862781
doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00532-9
pii: 10.1038/s43856-024-00532-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
106Subventions
Organisme : National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
ID : 80NSSC19K0883
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Afshinnekoo, E. et al. Fundamental Biological Features of Spaceflight: Advancing the Field to Enable Deep-Space Exploration. Cell 183, 1162–1184 (2020).
pubmed: 33242416
pmcid: 8441988
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.050
Crucian, B. et al. Incidence of clinical symptoms during long-duration orbital spaceflight. Int. J. Gen. Med. 9, 383–391 (2016).
pubmed: 27843335
pmcid: 5098747
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S114188
Rooney, B. V., Crucian, B. E., Pierson, D. L., Laudenslager, M. L. & Mehta, S. K. Herpes Virus Reactivation in Astronauts During Spaceflight and Its Application on Earth. Front. Microbiol. 10, 16 (2019).
pubmed: 30792698
pmcid: 6374706
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00016
Mehta, S. K. et al. Dermatitis during Spaceflight Associated with HSV-1 Reactivation. Viruses 14, 789 (2022).
pubmed: 35458519
pmcid: 9028032
doi: 10.3390/v14040789
Crucian, B. et al. A case of persistent skin rash and rhinitis with immune system dysregulation onboard the International Space Station. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 4, 759–762.e8 (2016).
pubmed: 27036643
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.12.021
Law, J., Gilmore, S. & Kelly, S. Postflight Rash and Skin Sensitivity Following a Year-Long Spaceflight Mission. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 91, 604–607 (2020).
pubmed: 32591038
doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5580.2020
Linnarsson, D. et al. Toxicity of lunar dust. Planet. Space Sci. 74, 57–71 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.05.023
Avila-Herrera, A. et al. Crewmember microbiome may influence microbial composition of ISS habitable surfaces. PLoS One 15, e0231838 (2020).
pubmed: 32348348
pmcid: 7190111
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231838
Sugita, T. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the skin fungal microbiota of astronauts during a half-year stay at the International Space Station. Med. Mycol. 54, 232–239 (2016).
pubmed: 26773135
doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv121
Xiao, S., Venkateswaran, K. J. & Jiang, S. C. The risk of Staphylococcus skin infection during space travel and mitigation strategies. Microbial Risk Anal. 11, 23–30 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2018.08.001
Mao, X. W. et al. Biological and metabolic response in STS-135 space-flown mouse skin. Free Radic. Res. 48, 890–897 (2014).
pubmed: 24796731
doi: 10.3109/10715762.2014.920086
Neutelings, T. et al. Skin physiology in microgravity: a 3-month stay aboard ISS induces dermal atrophy and affects cutaneous muscle and hair follicles cycling in mice. NPJ Microgravity 1, 15002 (2015).
pubmed: 28725708
pmcid: 5515501
doi: 10.1038/npjmgrav.2015.2
Terada, M. et al. Effects of a Closed Space Environment on Gene Expression in Hair Follicles of Astronauts in the International Space Station. PLoS One 11, e0150801 (2016).
pubmed: 27029003
pmcid: 4814050
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150801
Heinrich, H. T. M. W. Change in skin physiological parameters in space - report on and results of the first study on man. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 21, 283–292 (2008).
pubmed: 18663342
doi: 10.1159/000148045
Braun, N. et al. Current Data on Effects of Long-Term Missions on the International Space Station on Skin Physiological Parameters. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 32, 43–51 (2019).
pubmed: 30485843
doi: 10.1159/000494688
Jones, C. W. et al. Molecular and physiologic changes in the SpaceX Inspiration4 civilian crew. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07648-x (2024).
Park, J. et al. Spatial multi-omics of human skin reveals KRAS and inflammatory responses to spaceflight. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48625-2 (2024).
Matsuda, C. et al. Dietary intervention of mice using an improved Multiple Artificial-gravity Research System (MARS) under artificial 1 g. NPJ Microgravity 5, 16 (2019).
pubmed: 31312718
pmcid: 6614370
doi: 10.1038/s41526-019-0077-0
Garrett-Bakelman, F. E. et al. The NASA Twins Study: A multidimensional analysis of a year-long human spaceflight. Science 364, eaau8650 (2019).
pubmed: 30975860
pmcid: 7580864
doi: 10.1126/science.aau8650
Overbey, E. G. et al. NASA GeneLab RNA-seq consensus pipeline: standardized processing of short-read RNA-seq data. iScience 24, 102361 (2021).
pubmed: 33870146
pmcid: 8044432
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102361
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).
pubmed: 27043002
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519
Voorhees, J. J. Clinical effects of long-term therapy with topical tretinoin and cellular mode of action. J. Int. Med. Res. 18, 26C–28C (1990).
pubmed: 2227085
Rosenfeld, J. A., Mason, C. E. & Smith, T. M. Limitations of the human reference genome for personalized genomics. PLoS One 7, e40294 (2012).
pubmed: 22811759
pmcid: 3394790
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040294
Muratani, M. Cell-free RNA analysis of plasma samples collected from six astronauts in JAXA Cell-Free Epigenome (CFE) Study. https://doi.org/10.26030/r2xr-h714 (2022).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43, e47 (2015).
pubmed: 25605792
pmcid: 4402510
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007
Overbey, E. et al. The Space Omics and Medical Atlas (SOMA): A comprehensive data resource and biobank for astronauts. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07639-y (2024).
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell 177, 1888–1902.e21 (2019).
pubmed: 31178118
pmcid: 6687398
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031
Barisic, D. et al. ARID1A orchestrates SWI/SNF-mediated sequential binding of transcription factors with ARID1A loss driving pre-memory B cell fate and lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell 42, 583–604.e11 (2024).
Smith, S. M., Heer, M., Wang, Z., Huntoon, C. L. & Zwart, S. R. Long-duration space flight and bed rest effects on testosterone and other steroids. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 270–278 (2012).
pubmed: 22049169
doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2233
Zwart, S. R. et al. Genotype, B-vitamin status, and androgens affect spaceflight-induced ophthalmic changes. FASEB J. 30, 141–148 (2016).
pubmed: 26316272
doi: 10.1096/fj.15-278457
Abzu, A. I. Feyn Software. https://pypi.org/project/feyn/ (2024).
Itadani, H., Mizuarai, S. & Kotani, H. Can systems biology understand pathway activation? Gene expression signatures as surrogate markers for understanding the complexity of pathway activation. Curr. Genomics 9, 349–360 (2008).
pubmed: 19517027
pmcid: 2694555
doi: 10.2174/138920208785133235
Christensen, N. J. et al. Identifying interactions in omics data for clinical biomarker discovery using symbolic regression. Bioinformatics 38, 3749–3758 (2022).
pubmed: 35731214
pmcid: 9344843
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac405
Elsborg, J. & Salvatore, M. Using LLMs and Explainable ML to Analyze Biomarkers at Single-Cell Level for Improved Understanding of Diseases. Biomolecules 13, 1516 (2023).
pubmed: 37892198
pmcid: 10605495
doi: 10.3390/biom13101516
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Astels, S. hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw. 2, 205 (2017).
doi: 10.21105/joss.00205
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Chen, E. Y. et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14, 128 (2013).
pubmed: 23586463
pmcid: 3637064
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-128
Krämer, A., Green, J., Pollard, J. Jr & Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 30, 523–530 (2014).
pubmed: 24336805
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703
Ray, S. et al. GeneLab: Omics database for spaceflight experiments. Bioinformatics 35, 1753–1759 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty884
pubmed: 30329036
Murray, J. C. Radiation-induced fibrosis: the structure/function relationship. Scanning Microsc. 8, 79–85 (1994).
pubmed: 7973502
Klaus, R., Niyazi, M. & Lange-Sperandio, B. Radiation-induced kidney toxicity: molecular and cellular pathogenesis. Radiat. Oncol. 16, 43 (2021).
pubmed: 33632272
pmcid: 7905925
doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01764-y
Tian, J., Pecaut, M. J., Slater, J. M. & Gridley, D. S. Spaceflight modulates expression of extracellular matrix, adhesion, and profibrotic molecules in mouse lung. J. Appl. Physiol. 108, 162–171 (2010).
pubmed: 19850731
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00730.2009
Howell, G. R. et al. Radiation treatment inhibits monocyte entry into the optic nerve head and prevents neuronal damage in a mouse model of glaucoma. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 1246–1261 (2012).
pubmed: 22426214
pmcid: 3314470
doi: 10.1172/JCI61135
Akiyama, T. et al. How does spaceflight affect the acquired immune system? NPJ Microgravity 6, 14 (2020).
pubmed: 32411817
pmcid: 7206142
doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-0104-1
Vilà-Brau, A., De Sousa-Coelho, A. L., Mayordomo, C., Haro, D. & Marrero, P. F. Human HMGCS2 regulates mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and FGF21 expression in HepG2 cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 20423–20430 (2011).
pubmed: 21502324
pmcid: 3121469
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.235044
Perry, J. R. B. et al. Stratifying type 2 diabetes cases by BMI identifies genetic risk variants in LAMA1 and enrichment for risk variants in lean compared to obese cases. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002741 (2012).
pubmed: 22693455
pmcid: 3364960
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002741
Neve, B. et al. Role of transcription factor KLF11 and its diabetes-associated gene variants in pancreatic beta cell function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4807–4812 (2005).
pubmed: 15774581
pmcid: 554843
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409177102
Parikh, H. et al. TXNIP regulates peripheral glucose metabolism in humans. PLoS Med. 4, e158 (2007).
pubmed: 17472435
pmcid: 1858708
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040158
Peterson, J. M. et al. CTRP9 transgenic mice are protected from diet-induced obesity and metabolic dysfunction. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 305, R522–R533 (2013).
pubmed: 23842676
pmcid: 3763026
doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00110.2013
de Souza, G. O., Wasinski, F. & Donato, J. Jr. Characterization of the metabolic differences between male and female C57BL/6 mice. Life Sci. 301, 120636 (2022).
pubmed: 35568227
doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120636
Skon, C. N. et al. Transcriptional downregulation of S1pr1 is required for the establishment of resident memory CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 14, 1285–1293 (2013).
pubmed: 24162775
pmcid: 3844557
doi: 10.1038/ni.2745
Jung, M. et al. Pyrrolidone carboxylic acid levels or caspase-14 expression in the corneocytes of lesional skin correlates with clinical severity, skin barrier function and lesional inflammation in atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 76, 231–239 (2014).
pubmed: 25315296
doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2014.09.004
Winge, M. C. G. et al. Filaggrin genotype determines functional and molecular alterations in skin of patients with atopic dermatitis and ichthyosis vulgaris. PLoS One 6, e28254 (2011).
pubmed: 22164253
pmcid: 3229525
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028254
Liu, M. et al. Non‑invasive proteome‑wide quantification of skin barrier‑related proteins using label‑free LC‑MS/MS analysis. Mol. Med. Rep. 21, 2227–2235 (2020).
pubmed: 32186761
pmcid: 7115193
Deing, V. et al. Oxytocin modulates proliferation and stress responses of human skin cells: implications for atopic dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol. 22, 399–405 (2013).
pubmed: 23711064
doi: 10.1111/exd.12155
Chai, Z. et al. 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type XI localizes to human steroidogenic cells. Endocrinology 144, 2084–2091 (2003).
pubmed: 12697717
doi: 10.1210/en.2002-221030
Edqvist, P.-H. D. et al. Expression of human skin-specific genes defined by transcriptomics and antibody-based profiling. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 63, 129–141 (2015).
pubmed: 25411189
doi: 10.1369/0022155414562646
Wallmeyer, L. et al. TSLP is a direct trigger for T cell migration in filaggrin-deficient skin equivalents. Sci. Rep. 7, 774 (2017).
pubmed: 28377574
pmcid: 5428778
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00670-2
Lagrelius, M. et al. Filaggrin gene mutations in relation to contact allergy and hand eczema in adolescence. Contact Dermatitis 82, 147–152 (2020).
pubmed: 31782153
doi: 10.1111/cod.13444
Markiewicz, A., Sigorski, D., Markiewicz, M., Owczarczyk-Saczonek, A. & Placek, W. Caspase-14-From Biomolecular Basics to Clinical Approach. A Review of Available Data. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 5575 (2021).
pubmed: 34070382
pmcid: 8197544
doi: 10.3390/ijms22115575
Hvid, M. et al. Regulation of caspase 14 expression in keratinocytes by inflammatory cytokines–a possible link between reduced skin barrier function and inflammation? Exp. Dermatol. 20, 633–636 (2011).
pubmed: 21539619
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01280.x
Radstake, W. E., Baselet, B., Baatout, S. & Verslegers, M. Spaceflight Stressors and Skin Health. Biomedicines 10, 364 (2022).
pubmed: 35203572
pmcid: 8962330
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10020364
Pavan, W. J. & Sturm, R. A. The Genetics of Human Skin and Hair Pigmentation. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 20, 41–72 (2019).
pubmed: 31100995
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015230
Mirastschijski, U. et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 is Key Effector of TNF-α-Induced Collagen Degradation in Skin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 5234 (2019).
pubmed: 31652545
pmcid: 6829232
doi: 10.3390/ijms20205234
Min, M. et al. Role of keratin 24 in human epidermal keratinocytes. PLoS One 12, e0174626 (2017).
pubmed: 28362807
pmcid: 5376294
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174626
Jackson, B. et al. Late cornified envelope family in differentiating epithelia–response to calcium and ultraviolet irradiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 124, 1062–1070 (2005).
pubmed: 15854049
doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23699.x
Bergboer, J. G. M. et al. Psoriasis risk genes of the late cornified envelope-3 group are distinctly expressed compared with genes of other LCE groups. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 1470–1477 (2011).
pubmed: 21435436
pmcid: 3078472
doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.12.017
Kretz, R. et al. Defect in proline synthesis: pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1 deficiency leads to a complex clinical phenotype with collagen and elastin abnormalities. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 34, 731–739 (2011).
pubmed: 21487760
doi: 10.1007/s10545-011-9319-3
Kuivaniemi, H. & Tromp, G. Type III collagen (COL3A1): Gene and protein structure, tissue distribution, and associated diseases. Gene 707, 151–171 (2019).
pubmed: 31075413
pmcid: 6579750
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.05.003
D’hondt, S. et al. Type III collagen affects dermal and vascular collagen fibrillogenesis and tissue integrity in a mutant Col3a1 transgenic mouse model. Matrix Biol. 70, 72–83 (2018).
pubmed: 29551664
doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.03.008
Giesen, M. et al. Ageing processes influence keratin and KAP expression in human hair follicles. Exp. Dermatol. 20, 759–761 (2011).
pubmed: 21569108
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01301.x
Brady, A. F. et al. The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes, rare types. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 175, 70–115 (2017).
pubmed: 28306225
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31550
Beheshti, A. et al. Genomic Changes Driven by Radiation-Induced DNA Damage and Microgravity in Human Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 10507 (2021).
pubmed: 34638848
pmcid: 8508777
doi: 10.3390/ijms221910507
Roderick, T. H. The response of twenty-seven inbred strains of mice to daily doses of whole-body x-irradiation. Radiat. Res. 20, 631–639 (1963).
pubmed: 14102482
doi: 10.2307/3571354
Mukherjee, S., Sainis, K. B. & Deobagkar, D. D. F1 hybrids of BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse strains respond differently to low-dose ionizing radiation exposure. J. Genet. 93, 667–682 (2014).
pubmed: 25572225
doi: 10.1007/s12041-014-0422-8
Cekanaviciute, E. et al. Mouse genomic associations with in vitro sensitivity to simulated space radiation. Life Sci. Space Res. 36, 47–58 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2022.07.006
da Silveira, W. A. et al. Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Mitochondrial Stress as a Central Biological Hub for Spaceflight Impact. Cell 183, 1185–1201.e20 (2020).
pubmed: 33242417
pmcid: 7870178
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.002
Sreedhar, A., Aguilera-Aguirre, L. & Singh, K. K. Mitochondria in skin health, aging, and disease. Cell Death Dis. 11, 444 (2020).
pubmed: 32518230
pmcid: 7283348
doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2649-z
Achouri, Y. et al. Identification of a dehydrogenase acting on D-2-hydroxyglutarate. Biochem. J. 381, 35–42 (2004).
pubmed: 15070399
pmcid: 1133759
doi: 10.1042/BJ20031933
Smith, S. M. et al. Benefits for bone from resistance exercise and nutrition in long-duration spaceflight: Evidence from biochemistry and densitometry. J. Bone Miner. Res. 27, 1896–1906 (2012).
pubmed: 22549960
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1647
Smith, S. M. et al. Bone metabolism and renal stone risk during International Space Station missions. Bone 81, 712–720 (2015).
pubmed: 26456109
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.10.002
Mostafa, W. Z. & Hegazy, R. A. Vitamin D and the skin: Focus on a complex relationship: A review. J. Advert. Res. 6, 793–804 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2014.01.011
Rid, R. et al. Deciphering the calcitriol-induced transcriptomic response in keratinocytes: presentation of novel target genes. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 50, 131–149 (2013).
pubmed: 23256991
doi: 10.1530/JME-11-0191
Alia, E. & Kerr, P. E. Vitamin D: Skin, sunshine, and beyond. Clin. Dermatol. 39, 840–846 (2021).
pubmed: 34785011
doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.05.025
Li, M. et al. Topical vitamin D3 and low-calcemic analogs induce thymic stromal lymphopoietin in mouse keratinocytes and trigger an atopic dermatitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11736–11741 (2006).
pubmed: 16880407
pmcid: 1544239
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604575103
Hong, S. P. et al. Topical calcitriol restores the impairment of epidermal permeability and antimicrobial barriers induced by corticosteroids. Br. J. Dermatol. 162, 1251–1260 (2010).
pubmed: 20302580
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09760.x
Broome, J. D. L-Asparaginase: discovery and development as a tumor-inhibitory agent. Cancer Treat. Rep. 65, 111–114 (1981).
pubmed: 7049374
Burke, M. J. & Zalewska-Szewczyk, B. Hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: immunology and clinical consequences. Fut. Oncol. 18, 1285–1299 (2022).
doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-1288
Yoham, A. L. & Casadesus, D. Tretinoin. In StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2023).
Thornton, M. J. Estrogens and aging skin. Dermatoendocrinol 5, 264–270 (2013).
pubmed: 24194966
pmcid: 3772914
doi: 10.4161/derm.23872
Boyd, A. S. & King, L. E. Jr. Tamoxifen-induced remission of psoriasis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 41, 887–889 (1999).
pubmed: 10534679
doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70356-7
Lee, O. et al. A randomized phase II presurgical trial of transdermal 4-hydroxytamoxifen gel versus oral tamoxifen in women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 3672–3682 (2014).
pubmed: 25028506
pmcid: 4101910
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3045
Gallo, M. A. & Kaufman, D. Antagonistic and agonistic effects of tamoxifen: significance in human cancer. Semin. Oncol. 24, S1–71–S1–80 (1997).
Nguyen, C. N. & Urquieta, E. Contemporary review of dermatologic conditions in space flight and future implications for long-duration exploration missions. Life Sci. Space Res. 36, 147–156 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2022.10.004
Reynolds, R. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in the USA Astronaut Corps, 1959-2017. Occup. Environ. Med. 78, 869–875 (2021).
pubmed: 34039755
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-107143
Oka, S. et al. Human mitochondrial transcriptional factor A breaks the mitochondria-mediated vicious cycle in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep. 6, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37889 (2016).
Xu, W. et al. Oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 19, 17–30 (2011).
pubmed: 21251613
pmcid: 3229304
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.014
Seitzer, U., Bodo, M., Müller, P. K., Açil, Y. & Bätge, B. Microgravity and hypergravity effects on collagen biosynthesis of human dermal fibroblasts. Cell Tissue Res. 282, 513–517 (1995).
pubmed: 8581945
doi: 10.1007/BF00318883
Kahan, V., Andersen, M. L., Tomimori, J. & Tufik, S. Stress, immunity and skin collagen integrity: evidence from animal models and clinical conditions. Brain Behav. Immun. 23, 1089–1095 (2009).
pubmed: 19523511
doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.06.002
Stowe, R. P., Pierson, D. L. & Barrett, A. D. Elevated stress hormone levels relate to Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in astronauts. Psychosom. Med. 63, 891–895 (2001).
pubmed: 11719627
doi: 10.1097/00006842-200111000-00007
Horii, A. et al. Hippocampal gene expression, serum cortisol level, and spatial memory in rats exposed to hypergravity. J. Vestib. Res. 27, 209–215 (2017).
pubmed: 29081424
doi: 10.3233/VES-170521
Kim, J. et al. Single-cell multi-ome and immune profiles of the Inspiration4 crew reveal conserved, cell-type, and sex-specific responses to spaceflight. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49211-2 (2024).
Yan, Y. et al. Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Skin Across Different Anatomic Sites. J. Invest. Dermatol. 143, 398–407.e5 (2023).
pubmed: 36122800
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2022.08.053
Rinn, J. L., Bondre, C., Gladstone, H. B., Brown, P. O. & Chang, H. Y. Anatomic demarcation by positional variation in fibroblast gene expression programs. PLoS Genet. 2, e119 (2006).
pubmed: 16895450
pmcid: 1523235
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020119
Resing, K. A., Walsh, K. A., Haugen-Scofield, J. & Dale, B. A. Identification of proteolytic cleavage sites in the conversion of profilaggrin to filaggrin in mammalian epidermis. J. Biol. Chem. 264, 1837–1845 (1989).
pubmed: 2912987
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)94264-X
Rosso, J. D., Zeichner, J., Alexis, A., Cohen, D. & Berson, D. Understanding the Epidermal Barrier in Healthy and Compromised Skin: Clinically Relevant Information for the Dermatology Practitioner: Proceedings of an Expert Panel Roundtable Meeting. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 9, S2–S8 (2016).
pubmed: 28936279
pmcid: 5608132
Brown, S. J. & Irvine, A. D. Atopic eczema and the filaggrin story. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 27, 128–137 (2008).
pubmed: 18620134
doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2008.04.001
Nithya, S., Radhika, T. & Jeddy, N. Loricrin - an overview. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 19, 64–68 (2015).
pubmed: 26097310
pmcid: 4451671
doi: 10.4103/0973-029X.157204
Ishitsuka, Y. & Roop, D. R. Loricrin at the Boundary between Inside and Outside. Biomolecules 12, 673 (2022).
pubmed: 35625601
pmcid: 9138667
doi: 10.3390/biom12050673
Ye, Y.-M., Kim, B. E., Shin, Y.-S., Park, H.-S. & Leung, D. Y. M. Increased epidermal filaggrin in chronic idiopathic urticaria is associated with severity of urticaria. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 112, 533–538 (2014).
pubmed: 24726196
pmcid: 4105176
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.03.016
Denecker, G., Ovaere, P., Vandenabeele, P. & Declercq, W. Caspase-14 reveals its secrets. J. Cell Biol. 180, 451–458 (2008).
pubmed: 18250198
pmcid: 2234247
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200709098
Čepelak, I., Dodig, S. & Pavić, I. Filaggrin and atopic march. Biochem. Med. 29, 020501 (2019).
doi: 10.11613/BM.2019.020501
Kirchmeier, P., Zimmer, A., Bouadjar, B., Rösler, B. & Fischer, J. Whole-Exome-Sequencing Reveals Small Deletions in CASP14 in Patients with Autosomal Recessive Inherited Ichthyosis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 97, 102–104 (2017).
pubmed: 27494380
doi: 10.2340/00015555-2510
Ye, Y. M., Kim, B. E., Shin, Y. S., Park, H.-S. & Leung, D. Y. M. Overexpression of Epidermal Filaggrin in Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria Correlates with Urticaria Severity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 131, AB56 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.12.1524
Smith, F. J. D. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the gene encoding filaggrin cause ichthyosis vulgaris. Nat. Genet. 38, 337–342 (2006).
pubmed: 16444271
doi: 10.1038/ng1743
Palmer, C. N. A. et al. Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat. Genet. 38, 441–446 (2006).
pubmed: 16550169
doi: 10.1038/ng1767
Mackay, L. K. et al. The developmental pathway for CD103(+)CD8+ tissue-resident memory T cells of skin. Nat. Immunol. 14, 1294–1301 (2013).
pubmed: 24162776
doi: 10.1038/ni.2744
Masuda-Kuroki, K. & Di Nardo, A. Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Signaling at the Skin Barrier Interface. Biology 11, 809 (2022).
pubmed: 35741330
pmcid: 9219813
doi: 10.3390/biology11060809
Igawa, S. et al. Human Keratinocytes Use Sphingosine 1-Phosphate and its Receptors to Communicate Staphylococcus aureus Invasion and Activate Host Defense. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139, 1743–1752.e5 (2019).
pubmed: 30807768
pmcid: 7682680
doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.02.010
Morrison, M. D. et al. Investigation of Spaceflight Induced Changes to Astronaut Microbiomes. Front. Microbiol. 12, 659179 (2021).
pubmed: 34149649
pmcid: 8207296
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.659179
Ogonowska, P., Gilaberte, Y., Barańska-Rybak, W. & Nakonieczna, J. Colonization With Staphylococcus aureus in Atopic Dermatitis Patients: Attempts to Reveal the Unknown. Front. Microbiol. 11, 567090 (2020).
pubmed: 33505363
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.567090
Baldwin, H. E. et al. 40 years of topical tretinoin use in review. J. Drugs Dermatol. 12, 638–642 (2013).
pubmed: 23839179
Lee, D.-D. et al. Retinoid-responsive transcriptional changes in epidermal keratinocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 220, 427–439 (2009).
pubmed: 19388012
pmcid: 4386731
doi: 10.1002/jcp.21784
Hsia, E., Johnston, M. J., Houlden, R. J., Chern, W. H. & Hofland, H. E. J. Effects of topically applied acitretin in reconstructed human epidermis and the rhino mouse. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 125–130 (2008).
pubmed: 17637822
doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700968
Rendl, M. et al. Caspase-14 expression by epidermal keratinocytes is regulated by retinoids in a differentiation-associated manner. J. Invest. Dermatol. 119, 1150–1155 (2002).
pubmed: 12445205
doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.19532.x
Andrew, P., Valiani, S., MacIsaac, J., Mithoowani, H. & Verma, S. Tamoxifen-associated skin reactions in breast cancer patients: from case report to literature review. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 148, 1–5 (2014).
pubmed: 25292419
doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3150-0
Moseson, D. L. et al. The use of antiestrogens tamoxifen and nafoxidine in the treatment of human breast cancer in correlation with estrogen receptor values. A phase II study. Cancer 41, 797–802 (1978).
pubmed: 638966
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<797::AID-CNCR2820410303>3.0.CO;2-7
Mofarrah, R. et al. First report of tamoxifen-induced baboon syndrome. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 20, 2574–2578 (2021).
pubmed: 33253493
doi: 10.1111/jocd.13863
Nonomura, Y., Otsuka, A., Inui, S., Miyachi, Y. & Kabashima, K. Female pattern hair loss possibly caused by tamoxifen: Androgen receptor expression in the outer root sheath in the affected area. J. Dermatol. 39, 1060–1061 (2012).
pubmed: 22900892
doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2012.01632.x
Inalöz, H. S. et al. The effects of tamoxifen on rat skin. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol. 23, 50–52 (2002).
pubmed: 11876393
Murakami, K., Sawada, A., Mori, T., Sakuyama, S. & Tokudome, Y. Effect of estrogen/progesterone ratio on the differentiation and the barrier function of epidermal keratinocyte and three-dimensional cultured human epidermis. Life Sci 293, 120356 (2022).
pubmed: 35081394
doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120356
Stevenson, S. & Thornton, J. Effect of estrogens on skin aging and the potential role of SERMs. Clin. Interv. Aging 2, 283–297 (2007).
pubmed: 18044179
pmcid: 2685269
doi: 10.2147/CIA.S798
Movérare, S., Lindberg, M. K., Faergemann, J., Gustafsson, J.-A. & Ohlsson, C. Estrogen receptor alpha, but not estrogen receptor beta, is involved in the regulation of the hair follicle cycling as well as the thickness of epidermis in male mice. J. Invest. Dermatol. 119, 1053–1058 (2002).
pubmed: 12445192
doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00637.x
Oh, H. S. & Smart, R. C. An estrogen receptor pathway regulates the telogen-anagen hair follicle transition and influences epidermal cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 12525–12530 (1996).
pubmed: 8901615
pmcid: 38025
doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12525
Kömüves, L. G. et al. Ligands and activators of nuclear hormone receptors regulate epidermal differentiation during fetal rat skin development. J. Invest. Dermatol. 111, 429–433 (1998).
pubmed: 9740236
doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00296.x
Kamp, E., Ashraf, M., Musbahi, E. & DeGiovanni, C. Menopause, skin and common dermatoses. Part 2: skin disorders. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 47, 2117–2122 (2022).
pubmed: 35727900
pmcid: 10092853
doi: 10.1111/ced.15308
Lephart, E. D. & Naftolin, F. Menopause and the Skin: Old Favorites and New Innovations in Cosmeceuticals for Estrogen-Deficient Skin. Dermatol. Ther. 11, 53–69 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00468-7
NLSP. https://nlsp.nasa.gov/explore/lsdahome/datarequest (2024).