Delayed breast reconstruction with autologous free flap after radiation therapy: vascular complications and aesthetic outcomes.

Aesthetic outcome Delayed breast reconstruction Free autologous flap Radiation therapy Vascular complication

Journal

Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)
ISSN: 1880-4233
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 100888201

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 29 12 2023
accepted: 10 05 2024
medline: 12 6 2024
pubmed: 12 6 2024
entrez: 11 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The safety and outcome of breast reconstruction after radiotherapy are controversial, and the aesthetic aspects have not been studied extensively. We compared the results of vascular anastomosis, the incidence of postoperative complications, and aesthetic appearance between patients who had and had not received radiotherapy who then had undergone delayed breast reconstruction with autologous free flaps from the abdomen, thighs, and buttocks. In total, 257 flaps in 241 patients were investigated; 194 and 63 flaps implanted in patients who did not receive radiotherapy and who received radiotherapy before breast reconstruction, respectively. Of the 257 flaps, 221, 20, 14, and 2 came from the abdomen, thighs, buttocks, and other anatomic locations, respectively. We evaluated aesthetic outcomes in 105 patients who had not received radiotherapy and 35 who had. We found no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of vascular reanastomosis, the time required for anastomosis, or the incidence of unplanned reoperation. Complications such as flap necrosis were rare in both groups. Aesthetic outcomes were significantly better in the patients who had not received radiotherapy. Breast reconstruction with autologous free flaps can be performed safely in patients who have received radiotherapy, but the aesthetic result is slightly inferior to that in patients who had not received radiotherapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The safety and outcome of breast reconstruction after radiotherapy are controversial, and the aesthetic aspects have not been studied extensively. We compared the results of vascular anastomosis, the incidence of postoperative complications, and aesthetic appearance between patients who had and had not received radiotherapy who then had undergone delayed breast reconstruction with autologous free flaps from the abdomen, thighs, and buttocks.
METHODS METHODS
In total, 257 flaps in 241 patients were investigated; 194 and 63 flaps implanted in patients who did not receive radiotherapy and who received radiotherapy before breast reconstruction, respectively. Of the 257 flaps, 221, 20, 14, and 2 came from the abdomen, thighs, buttocks, and other anatomic locations, respectively. We evaluated aesthetic outcomes in 105 patients who had not received radiotherapy and 35 who had.
RESULTS RESULTS
We found no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of vascular reanastomosis, the time required for anastomosis, or the incidence of unplanned reoperation. Complications such as flap necrosis were rare in both groups. Aesthetic outcomes were significantly better in the patients who had not received radiotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Breast reconstruction with autologous free flaps can be performed safely in patients who have received radiotherapy, but the aesthetic result is slightly inferior to that in patients who had not received radiotherapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38862869
doi: 10.1007/s12282-024-01593-3
pii: 10.1007/s12282-024-01593-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.

Références

Jagsi R, Momoh AO, Qi J, Hamill JB, Billig J, Kim HM, et al. Impact of radiotherapy on complications and patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:157–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx148 .
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx148 pubmed: 28954300
Shumway DA, Momoh AO, Sabel MS, Jagsi R. Integration of breast reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2329–40. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02850 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02850 pubmed: 32442071
Yun JH, Diaz R, Orman AG. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Cancer Control. 2018;25:1073274818795489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274818795489 .
doi: 10.1177/1073274818795489 pubmed: 30132338 pmcid: 6108018
Chang EI, Liu TS, Festekjian JH, Da Lio AL, Crisera CA. Effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer based on type of free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1e–8e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729d33 .
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729d33 pubmed: 23271550
Tran NV, Chang DW, Gupta A, Kroll SS, Robb GL. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200107000-00013 .
doi: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00013 pubmed: 11420508
O’Connell RL, Di Micco R, Khabra K, Kirby AM, Harris PA, James SE, et al. Comparison of immediate versus delayed DIEP flap reconstruction in women who require postmastectomy radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:594–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004676 .
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004676 pubmed: 29927832 pmcid: 6112844
Fosnot J, Fischer JP, Smartt JM Jr, Low DW, Kovach SJ, Wu LC, et al. Does previous chest wall irradiation increase vascular complications in free autologous breast reconstruction? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:496–504. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed560 .
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed560 pubmed: 20966818
Mull AB, Qureshi AA, Zubovic E, Rao YJ, Zoberi I, Sharma K, et al. Impact of time interval between radiation and free autologous breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33:130–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593806 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593806 pubmed: 27798949
Duraes EFR, Schwarz GS, de Sousa JB, Duraes LC, Morisada M, Baker T, et al. Factors influencing the aesthetic outcome and quality of life after breast reconstruction: a cross-sectional study. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84:494–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002157 .
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002157 pubmed: 32032118
Tadiparthi S, Alrawi M, Collis N. Two-stage delayed breast reconstruction with an expander and free abdominal tissue transfer: outcomes of 65 consecutive cases by a single surgeon. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1608–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.046 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.046 pubmed: 21840780
Fracol ME, Basta MN, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Wu LC, Serletti JM, et al. Bilateral free flap breast reconstruction after unilateral radiation: comparing intraoperative vascular complications and postoperative outcomes in radiated versus nonradiated breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:311–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000545 .
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000545 pubmed: 26545214
Shechter S, Arad E, Inbal A, Friedman O, Gur E, Barnea Y. DIEP flap breast reconstruction complication rate in previously irradiated internal mammary nodes. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34:399–403. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1625986 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625986 pubmed: 29672777
Muto M, Satake T, Masuda Y, Kobayashi S, Tamura S, Kobayashi S, et al. Absent internal mammary recipient vein in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2660.
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002660 pubmed: 32309101 pmcid: 7159964
Heiman AJ, Gabbireddy SR, Kotamarti VS, Ricci JA. A meta-analysis of autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;37:336–45. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716846 .
doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716846 pubmed: 32957153
Kelley BP, Ahmed R, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Chung KC, Momoh AO. A systematic review of morbidity associated with autologous breast reconstruction before and after exposure to radiotherapy: are current practices ideal? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1732–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3494-z .
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3494-z pubmed: 24473643 pmcid: 4153351
Beugels J, Meijvogel JLW, Tuinder SMH, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Heuts EM, Piatkowski A, et al. The influence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications of immediate DIEP flap breast reconstructions. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176:367–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05241-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05241-9 pubmed: 31030303 pmcid: 6555777
Narui K, Ishikawa T, Satake T, Adachi S, Yamada A, Shimada K, et al. Outcomes of immediate perforator flap reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:94–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.09.001 pubmed: 25245538
Nakazono M, Satake T, Tsunoda Y, Muto M, Hirotomi K, Narui K, et al. Internal mammary lymph node biopsy during delayed free flap breast reconstruction: case series and review of the literature. Eur J Plast Surg. 2022;45:277–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01879-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00238-021-01879-1
El-Sabawi B, Ho AL, Sosin M, Patel KM. Patient-centered outcomes of breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:768–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.015 pubmed: 28416138
Huis’t Veld EA, Long C, Sue GR, Chattopadhyay A, Lee GK. Analysis of aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction after delayed-immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80:S303-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001418 .
doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001418
Anderson PR, Hanlon AL, Fowble BL, McNeeley SW, Freedman GM. Low complication rates are achievable after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:1080–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.036 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.036 pubmed: 15234042

Auteurs

Kimie Miyazawa (K)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Nagano Matsushiro General Hospital, Nagano, Japan.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Toshihiko Satake (T)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan. toshi@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.

Mayu Muto (M)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Yui Tsunoda (Y)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Tomoyuki Koike (T)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Kazutaka Narui (K)

Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Ryohei Katsuragi (R)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Satoshi Onoda (S)

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Takashi Ishikawa (T)

Department of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH