Join point trends of instrumental vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria (2002-2017).
cesarean delivery
forceps
operative delivery
operative vaginal delivery
vacuum
ventouse
Journal
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jun 2024
12 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
22
03
2024
received:
01
12
2023
accepted:
11
05
2024
medline:
12
6
2024
pubmed:
12
6
2024
entrez:
12
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To determine the trends of instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and cesarean section (CS) at the Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH), Nigeria, over 16 years, from 2002 to 2017. A retrospective cross-sectional study. The case records of all women who had IVD and CS during the study period were reviewed. The trends in the IVD and CS rates were evaluated using join point regression modeling. The average annual percent change (AAPC) and annual percent change (APC) with associated 95% confidence interval of segmental trends were calculated. The overall IVD rate was 1.36%. Vacuum delivery rate was higher than forceps (0.79% vs 0.57%). The CS rate was 44.9 per 100 deliveries; the rate increased by about 3.7% per annum. CS rates were 7.1-89.9 times the IVD rates within the study period. The number of IVDs performed in the hospital declined by about 83.02%, from 53 cases in 2002 to nine cases in 2017. Forceps delivery declined at a faster rate than vacuum delivery between 2002 and 2017 (AAPC for forceps: -12.6% [-17.5 to -7.5], P < 0.001 vs AAPC for vacuum: -6.2% [-14.3 to 2.7], P = 0.200). The commonest indication for IVD was prolonged second stage of labor (47/162, 29.01%) and shortening of the second stage of labor for maternal conditions (47/162, 29.01%). IVD rates are low and declining at LUTH. There is need to train accoucheurs on the safe use of IVDs to potentially reduce the CS rate.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Références
Biru S, Addisu D, Kassa S, Animen S. Maternal complication related to instrumental delivery at Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cross‐sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):1‐5.
Tshering S, Dorji N, Wangden T. Trend in instrumental vaginal deliveries at the National Referral Hospital in Bhutan: a review of hospital records. J South Asian Feder Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;13(6):431‐435.
Alegbeleye JO, Orazulike NC, Nyengidiki TK, et al. A 10‐year review of instrumental vaginal delivery at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:118‐122.
Jabeen N, Baloch R, Malhi P, Zahiruddin S, Mawani K. Foeto‐maternal outcome in instrumental vaginal delivery attending a secondary hospital in Hyderabad (Aga Khan Maternal and Child Care Centre). J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(12):1833‐1836.
Torloni MR, Opiyo N, Altieri E, et al. Interventions to reintroduce or increase assisted vaginal births: a systematic review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e070640.
Anozie OB, Osaheni LL, Onu FA, et al. Declining rate of operative vaginal deliveries in Nigeria. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;8(3):175‐184.
Hotton EJ, Blencowe NS, Lenguerrand E, Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Wade J. Women's experiences of the Odon Device to assist vaginal birth and participation in intrapartum research: a qualitative study in a maternity unit in the Southwest of England. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12):e057023.
Crowley CM, Lang NA, O'Leary BD, Geary MP. Trends in instrument preference for operative vaginal delivery in a tertiary referral center: 2008–2021. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2023;162:752‐758.
Dutywa A, Olorunfemi G, Mbodi L. Trends and determinants of operative vaginal delivery at two academic hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa 2005–2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:16182.
Emuveyan EE, Agboghoroma OC. Instrumental vaginal deliveries in Lagos, Nigeria: a 7 year study (1989–1995). Niger Quart J Hosp Med. 1997;7:195‐198.
Ogedengbe OK, Odeneye TO. Outcome of instrumental deliveries in Lagos Nigeria implications for its use at the second‐tier healthcare level. Niger Med Pract. 2004;45(6):106‐110.
Sowemimo OO, Abdur‐Rahim ZF, Kolawole OO, et al. Review of instrumental vaginal delivery at the Obafemi Awolowo University teaching hospitals complex. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:133‐136.
Daru PH, Egbodo C, Suleiman M, Shambe IH, Magaji AF, Ochejele S. A decade of instrumental vaginal deliveries in Jos University Teaching Hospital, North Central Nigeria (2007–2016). Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;35:113‐117.
Pattinson RC, Vannevel V, Barnard D, et al. Failure to perform assisted deliveries is resulting in an increased neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality: an expert opinion. S Afr Med J. 2018;108:75‐78.
Anim‐Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Jones L. Epidural versus non‐epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;12(12):CD000331.
MacFarlane AJ, Blondel B, Mohangoo AD, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk‐stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro‐Peristat study. BJOG. 2016;123(4):559‐568.
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392:1341‐1348.
Kibe PM, Mbuthia GW, Shikuku DN, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in Rwanda: a trend analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey 2000 to 2019–2020. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):1‐3.
Visser GHA, Ayres‐de‐Campos D, Barnea ER, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286‐1287.
Verma GL, Spalding JJ, Wilkinson MD, et al. Instruments for assisted vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;9(9):CD005455.
Gnanasekaran V, Kanamma S, Dhinakaran S, et al. Assisted vaginal delivery‐preference of vacuum or forceps among obstetricians. JPRI. 2021;33(51B):147‐155.
Kyser KL, Lu X, Santillan D, et al. Forceps delivery volumes in teaching and nonteaching hospitals: are volumes sufficient for physicians to acquire and maintain competence? Acad Med. 2014;89(1):71‐76.
Bardos J, Loudon H, Rekawek P, Friedman F, Brodman M, Fox NS. Association between senior obstetrician supervision of resident deliveries and mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):486‐490.
Gossett DR, Gilchrist‐Scott D, Wayne DB, Gerber SE. Simulation training for forceps‐assisted vaginal delivery and rates of maternal perineal trauma. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):429‐435.