"Mail-slot" technique for minimally-invasive placement of subdural grid electrodes: a single-institution experience.
craniotomy
epilepsy
intracranial monitoring
medically-intractable
subdural grid
Journal
World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jun 2024
10 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
25
03
2024
revised:
04
06
2024
accepted:
05
06
2024
medline:
13
6
2024
pubmed:
13
6
2024
entrez:
12
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
In the management of multi-drug-resistant focal epilepsies, intracranial electrode implantation is employed for precise localization of the ictal onset zone. In select patients, subdural grid electrode implantation is utilized. Subdural grid placement traditionally requires large craniotomies to visualize the cortex prior to mapping. However, smaller craniotomies may enable shorter operations and reduced risks. We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing traditional large craniotomies with those undergoing tailored 'mini' craniotomies (the "Mail-Slot" technique) for subdural grid placement. This retrospective cohort study included 23 patients who underwent subdural electrode implantation for epilepsy monitoring between 2014 and 2020. Patients were categorized into mini craniotomies (N=9) and traditional large craniotomies (N=14) groups. Demographics, operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. Craniotomy size and number of electrodes were determined via post-hoc radiographs. Of the 23 patients studied, the mini group had smaller craniotomy sizes (mean=22.71 cm Our findings suggest that mini craniotomies for subdural grid placement in epilepsy monitoring offer significant advantages, including smaller craniotomy sizes and shorter operation durations, without compromising safety or efficacy. These results support the trend towards minimally invasive, patient-tailored surgical approaches in epilepsy treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the management of multi-drug-resistant focal epilepsies, intracranial electrode implantation is employed for precise localization of the ictal onset zone. In select patients, subdural grid electrode implantation is utilized. Subdural grid placement traditionally requires large craniotomies to visualize the cortex prior to mapping. However, smaller craniotomies may enable shorter operations and reduced risks. We aimed to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing traditional large craniotomies with those undergoing tailored 'mini' craniotomies (the "Mail-Slot" technique) for subdural grid placement.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included 23 patients who underwent subdural electrode implantation for epilepsy monitoring between 2014 and 2020. Patients were categorized into mini craniotomies (N=9) and traditional large craniotomies (N=14) groups. Demographics, operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. Craniotomy size and number of electrodes were determined via post-hoc radiographs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 23 patients studied, the mini group had smaller craniotomy sizes (mean=22.71 cm
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that mini craniotomies for subdural grid placement in epilepsy monitoring offer significant advantages, including smaller craniotomy sizes and shorter operation durations, without compromising safety or efficacy. These results support the trend towards minimally invasive, patient-tailored surgical approaches in epilepsy treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38866238
pii: S1878-8750(24)00966-5
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.