Clinical ethics problems in psychiatry and the need for clinical ethics consultation in Japan: A cross-sectional study.
clinical ethics consultations
ethical challenges
ethics support
psychiatry
quantitative research
Journal
PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
ISSN: 2769-2558
Titre abrégé: PCN Rep
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9918451287106676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
15
12
2022
revised:
17
02
2023
accepted:
19
03
2023
medline:
12
4
2023
pubmed:
12
4
2023
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Psychiatrists often encounter ethical dilemmas in their daily clinical practice. Clinical ethics consultations (CECs) have been recently increasing, especially in general hospitals. However, the current situation in the psychiatric field is unclear. This study clarifies clinical ethics problems in psychiatry and determines the need for CECs. We conducted an anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey in February 2022, which targeted directors and supervisors of psychiatric specialty training programs at 1224 psychiatry facilities. Responses were received from 311 facilities (response rate: 25.4%). CEC systems existed in 223 (72.2%) facilities, and medical safety committees were the most common. Clinical ethics problems occurred at 248 (80.3%) facilities; the most common method for managing the problems was discussions at case conferences without using CECs. The top four reasons for psychiatrists to solicit advice were conflicts with patients' relatives, treating a patient with cognitive impairment, discontinuation of treatment, and suicide/attempted suicide. Most respondents (89.9%) considered CECs necessary. Although CECs exist in psychiatry, they may not meet the needs of clients. Future studies are needed to investigate client satisfaction and CEC evaluation methods in facilities where psychiatric CECs are provided.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38868145
doi: 10.1002/pcn5.86
pii: PCN586
pmc: PMC11114266
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e86Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.