Stakeholder perspectives on scaling robotic surgery in India: qualitative research.
Da-vinci system
Intuitive surgicals
Modernized system
Robotic surgery
Vattikutti foundation
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
01
04
2024
accepted:
03
06
2024
medline:
13
6
2024
pubmed:
13
6
2024
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robotic surgery (RS) is a milestone in minimally invasive surgery. More than 500 surgeons are trained in RS in India, and more than 100 robotic systems have been installed across various centers. RS offers various benefits to patients and surgeons. Although it is rapidly advancing and has several advantages, a robotic system is a complex system that is equipped with complex instruments. Qualitative research aims to take a broad view of the perceptions of stakeholders of RS and to synthesize their views to gain insight into scaling RS. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of relevant stakeholders on RS to learn how to develop the field and make it more affordable. This study is based on grounded theory methodology and uses the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR) guidelines for reporting. Three premier hospitals that are pioneers in RS in India served as the study locations. Purposive sampling was used to collect data from surgeons, nurses, and insurance staff. The surgeons interviewed have national and international exposure and are consulting and performing robotic surgeries across India and internationally. We conducted one-on-one interviews and wrote memos to gather further information before approaching each stakeholder. Samples were determined based on theoretical saturation. Fellowship training, which includes simulation, bedside assistance, and individual cases under supervision, was found to be the standard training method. The stakeholders mentioned a few prerequisites for performing RS, such as prior laparoscopic experience, passion for surgical knowledge and skill, and proper case selection. The surgeons discussed some technical considerations of RS, such as medico-legal issues and mechanical faults associated with it. Although there is increased scope for establishing robotic surgery, surgeons feel that the cost of RS is high. From the interactions with the stakeholders, it is understood that robotic surgeons are the most significant players in RS. Robotic surgery demands more skills and more trained professionals to scale up. Key findings highlight the importance of fellowship training, prior laparoscopic experience, and proper case selection. While RS has potential for growth, high costs, and technical issues remain concerns. Insurance companies include robotic surgery in their policies under the category of "modernized medicine." Depending on the insurance plan that the patient selects, the necessity of the robotic surgery, and the surgeon's justification, the insurance company will pay for the patient's robotic surgery. To make it affordable for patients, complete insurance coverage is mandatory along with creating more awareness among patients. The growth of RS is inevitable in the future with other robotic companies emerging which will ultimately reduce the capital cost and robotic surgeons are pivotal in advancing RS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38869619
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02008-3
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-02008-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
250Subventions
Organisme : Indian Council of Social Science Research
ID : F.No. G-11/2021-22/ICSSR/RP
Organisme : Indian Council of Social Science Research
ID : F.No. G-11/2021-22/ICSSR/RP
Organisme : Indian Council of Social Science Research
ID : F.No. G-11/2021-22/ICSSR/RP
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Raj Vattikuti (1997) Robotic surgery timeline, Vattikuti foundation, https://vattikutifoundation.com/vfrsi-home/timeline-history/ . Accessed 18 February 2024
Nelivigi GG (2007) Robotic surgery: India is not ready yet. Indian J Urol 23(3):240–244. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.33443
doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.33443
pubmed: 19718321
pmcid: 2721597
Bora G et al (2020) Robot-assisted surgery in India: A SWOT analysis. Indian J Urol 36(1):1. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_220_19
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_220_19
pubmed: 31983817
pmcid: 6961426
Mayo Clinic (2024) Robotic surgery, https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/robotic-surgery/about/pac-20394974 . Accessed 20 May 2024
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic Surgery. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d
pubmed: 14685095
pmcid: 1356187
Dr. Sudhir (2022) The past, present, and future of robotic surgery, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/the-past-present-and-future-of-robotic-surgery/ . Accessed 18 February 2024
Gupta A, Chennatt J, Singla T, Rajput D, Bindal V (2022) Training and credentialing in robotic surgery in india: current perspectives. J Minim Access Surg 18(4):497. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_348_21
doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_348_21
pubmed: 36204934
pmcid: 9632699
Kathy Charmaz, Constructing Grounded Theory A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. SAGE Publications, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.sxf.uevora.pt/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Charmaz_2006.pdf
Cleland JA (2017) The qualitative orientation in medical education research. Korean J Med Educ 29(2):61–71. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2017.53
doi: 10.3946/kjme.2017.53
pubmed: 28597869
pmcid: 5465434
Hennink M, Kaiser BN (2022) Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med 292:114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
pubmed: 34785096
Intuitive Surgicals Inc. OR Staff training. https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/healthcare-professionals/or-staff . Accessed 20 May 2024
Company IS, Da Vinci learning, Intuitive Surgicals, Inc., https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci/learning . Accessed 20 May 2024
Regulatory I, Authority D (2020) IRDAI, vol. 4555, no. 115, pp. 1–17.Accessed 9 October 2023
Khandalavala K, Shimon T, Flores L, Armijo PR, Oleynikov D (2020) Emerging surgical robotic technology: a progression toward microbots. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 5:3–3. https://doi.org/10.21037/ales.2019.10.02
doi: 10.21037/ales.2019.10.02