Are Female-Breadwinner Couples Always Less Stable? Evidence from French Administrative Data.
Cohabitation
Divorce
Female-breadwinner couples
Income
Union dissolution
Journal
European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie
ISSN: 0168-6577
Titre abrégé: Eur J Popul
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8511777
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
19
07
2023
accepted:
20
05
2024
medline:
13
6
2024
pubmed:
13
6
2024
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The paper studies the association between partners' relative incomes and union dissolution among couples in France. With the increase in dual-earner couples and women's educational level, couples in which women earn more than their partners are structurally becoming more widespread. Because female breadwinning challenges long-lived social norms regarding traditional gender roles, scholars have theorized a higher risk of union dissolution among female-breadwinner couples compared to couples in other income arrangements. We estimate the risk of union dissolution using regression analyses on unique longitudinal data from French administrative sources containing an unconventionally high number of couples (4% of the population) and separation events (more than 100,000), as well as precise and reliable income measurement. Female-breadwinner couples face a higher risk of union dissolution compared to other couple types. This result is robust to various definitions of female breadwinning and controls for partners' employment status. Contrary to recent research on other countries, we find no sign of a fading effect among younger cohorts. However, among younger, cohabiting couples and couples in registered partnerships the risk of union dissolution is lowest when both partners are employed and provide a similar share of the total couple's income, suggesting the emergence of a new profile of stable couples. The female-breadwinner penalty in union dissolution is in place; also in France, it holds among married and cohabiting couples and registered partnerships, across all birth cohorts and levels of household income.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38869705
doi: 10.1007/s10680-024-09705-7
pii: 10.1007/s10680-024-09705-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
21Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Atkinson, M. P., & Boles, J. (1984). WASP (wives as senior partners). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46(4), 861–870.
doi: 10.2307/352534
Bair, D. (2007). Calling it quits: Late-life divorce and starting over. Random House.
Bales, R. F., & Parsons, T. (1955). Family: Socialization and interaction process. Free Press.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (enlarged edn.). Harvard University Press.
doi: 10.4159/9780674020665
Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571–614.
doi: 10.1093/qje/qjv001
Blossfeld, H. P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 513–530.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115913
Bouchet-Valat, M. (2018). Educational and socioeconomic homogamy, development level, and metropolisation across 149 European regions. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, 56(1), 53–84.
doi: 10.4000/ress.3989
Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64(3), 333–355.
doi: 10.1177/000312249906400302
Brown, S. L., & Lin, I. F. (2012). The gray divorce revolution: Rising divorce among middle-aged and older adults, 1990–2010. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(6), 731–741.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs089
Burgess, S., Propper, C., & Aassve, A. (2003). The role of income in marriage and divorce transitions among young Americans. Journal of Population Economics, 16(3), 455–475.
doi: 10.1007/s00148-003-0124-7
Cherlin, A. J. (2018), How inequality drives family formation: The prima facie case. In Unequal family lives: Causes and consequences in Europe and the Americas, (pp. 69–82).
Chesley, N. (2011). Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender and Society, 25(5), 642–664.
doi: 10.1177/0891243211417433
Chesley, N., & Flood, S. (2017). Signs of change? At-Home and breadwinner parents’ housework and child-care time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(2), 511–534.
doi: 10.1111/jomf.12376
Cooke, L. P. (2006). “Doing” gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 112(2), 442–472.
doi: 10.1086/506417
Deutsch, F. M., Roksa, J., & Meeske, C. (2003). How gender counts when couples count their money. Sex Roles, 48(7), 291–304.
doi: 10.1023/A:1022982328840
Domínguez-Folgueras, M. (2013). Is cohabitation more egalitarian? The division of household labor in five European countries. Journal of Family Issues, 34(12), 1623–1646.
doi: 10.1177/0192513X12464948
Doucet, A. (2016). Is the stay-at-home dad (SAHD) a feminist concept? A genealogical, relational, and feminist critique. Sex Roles, 75(1–2), 4–14.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0582-5
Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford University Press.
Esteve, A., Schwartz, C. R., Van Bavel, J., Permanyer, I., Klesment, M., & Garcia, J. (2016). The end of hypergamy: Global trends and implications. Population and Development Review, 42(4), 615–625.
doi: 10.1111/padr.12012
Foster, G., & Stratton, L. S. (2021). Does female breadwinning make partnerships less healthy or less stable? Journal of Population Economics, 34(1), 63–96.
doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00783-5
Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: How a new generation is reshaping family, work, and gender in America. Oxford University Press.
Gonalons-Pons, P., & Gangl, M. (2021). Marriage and masculinity: Male-breadwinner culture, unemployment, and separation risk in 29 countries. American Sociological Review, 86(3), 465–502.
doi: 10.1177/00031224211012442
Hamplová, D., Le Bourdais, C., & Legendre, B. (2021). Partners’ relative income and the risk of union dissolution in two institutional contexts. European Sociological Review, 37(4), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa074
doi: 10.1093/esr/jcaa074
Härkönen, J. (2014). Divorce Trends, patterns, causes, consequences. The Wiley Blackwell companion to the sociology of families. (pp. 303–322).
Insee (2021). Naissances hors mariage. Données annuelles de 1994 à 2021. Insee, statistiques de l'état civil. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2381394
Ishizuka, P. (2018). The economic foundations of cohabiting couples’ union transitions. Demography, 55(2), 535–557.
doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0651-1
Jalovaara, M. (2003). The joint effects of marriage partners’ socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demography, 40(1), 67–81.
doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0004
Jalovaara, M. (2013). Socioeconomic resources and the dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29(2), 167–193.
doi: 10.1007/s10680-012-9280-3
Kalmijn, M., Loeve, A., & Manting, D. (2007). Income dynamics in couples and the dissolution of marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 44(1), 159–179.
doi: 10.1353/dem.2007.0005
Kandil, L., & Périvier, H. (2021). Sharing or not sharing? Household division of labor by marital status in France, 1985–2009. Population, 76(1), 149–184.
Kanji, S., & Schober, P. (2014). Are couples with young children more likely to split up when the mother is the main or an equal earner? Sociology, 48(1), 38–58.
doi: 10.1177/0038038512467710
Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter?: Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21(1), 128–144.
doi: 10.1177/019251300021001006
Killewald, A. (2016). Money, work, and marital stability: Assessing change in the gendered determinants of divorce. American Sociological Review, 81(4), 696–719.
doi: 10.1177/0003122416655340
Klesment, M., & Van Bavel, J. (2017). The reversal of the gender gap in education, motherhood, and women as main earners in Europe. European Sociological Review, 33(3), 465–481.
Kowalewska, H., & Vitali, A. (2021). Breadwinning or on the breadline? Female breadwinners’ economic characteristics across 20 welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(2), 125–142.
doi: 10.1177/0958928720971094
Kowalewska, H., & Vitali, A. (2023). The female-breadwinner well-being ‘penalty’: Differences by men’s (un)employment and country. European Sociological Review, 40(2), 293–308.
doi: 10.1093/esr/jcad034
Kulu, H. (2012). Spatial variation in divorce and separation: Compositional or contextual effects? Population, Space and Place, 18(1), 1–15.
doi: 10.1002/psp.671
Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43(2), 203–221.
doi: 10.1353/dem.2006.0018
Lippmann, Q., Georgieff, A., & Senik, C. (2020). Undoing gender with institutions: Lessons from the German division and reunification. The Economic Journal, 130(629), 1445–1470.
doi: 10.1093/ej/uez057
Lyngstad, T. H., & Jalovaara, M. (2010). A review of the antecedents of union dissolution. Demographic Research, 23, 257–292.
doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.10
Meurs, D. & Pora, P. (2019). Gender equality on the labour market in France: A slow convergence hampered by motherhood. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, 510–511–512, 109–13.
Milewski, N., & Kulu, H. (2014). Mixed marriages in Germany: A high risk of divorce for immigrant-native couples/mariages mixtes en Allemagne: un risque de divorce élevé pour les couples immigrant (e) et natif (ve) d'Allemagne. European Journal of Population, 89–113.
Morin, T. (2014). Écarts de revenus au sein des couples, trois femmes sur quatre gagnent moins que leur conjoint. INSEE Première, (1492).
Ono, H. (1998). Husbands’ and wives’ resources and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 674–689.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 431–453.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.431
Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In R. Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its function and destiny (pp. 173–201). Harper.
Rao, A. H. (2020). Crunch time: How married couples confront unemployment. University of California Press.
doi: 10.1525/9780520970670
Rault, W., & Letrait, M. (2010). Different unions, distinct patterns? A comparison between heterosexual PACS couples and married couples. Sociologie, 1(3), 319–336.
doi: 10.3917/socio.003.0319
Rault, W., & Letrait, M. (2015). Diverse forms of union and the ‘gender order.’ INED Population Studies (pp. 43–68). Springer.
Rogers, S. J. (2004). Dollars, dependency, and divorce: Four perspectives on the role of wives’ income. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(1), 59–74.
doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00005.x
Ruggles, S. (2015). Patriarchy, power, and pay: The transformation of American families, 1800–2015. Demography, 52(6), 1797–1823.
doi: 10.1007/s13524-015-0440-z
Sayer, L. C., & Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Women’s economic independence and the probability of divorce: A review and reexamination. Journal of Family Issues, 21(7), 906–943.
doi: 10.1177/019251300021007005
Schwartz, C. R., & Gonalons-Pons, P. (2016). Trends in relative earnings and marital dissolution: Are wives who out-earn their husbands still more likely to divorce? Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences: RSF, 2(4), 218–236.
Schwartz, C. R., & Han, H. (2014). The reversal of the gender gap in education and trends in marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 79(4), 605–629.
doi: 10.1177/0003122414539682
Solaz, A. (2021). More frequent separation and repartnering among people aged 50 and over. Population & Societies, 2, 1–4.
Teachman, J. (2010). Wives’ economic resources and risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 31(10), 1305–1323.
doi: 10.1177/0192513X10370108
Theunis, L., Schnor, C., Willaert, D., & Van Bavel, J. (2018). His and her education and marital dissolution: Adding a contextual dimension. European Journal of Population, 34(4), 663–687.
doi: 10.1007/s10680-017-9448-y
Vitali, A., & Arpino, B. (2016). Who brings home the bacon? The influence of context on partners’ contributions to the household income. Demographic Research, 35, 1213–1244.
doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.41
Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., & Noack, T. (2009). A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 465–477.
doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00613.x
Winkler, A. E., McBride, T. D., & Andrews, C. (2005). Wives who out-earn their husbands: A transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples? Demography, 42(3), 523–535.
doi: 10.1353/dem.2005.0028
Winslow-Bowe, S. (2006). The persistence of wives’ income advantage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 824–842.
doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00298.x
Zagorsky, J. L. (2003). Husbands’ and wives’ view of the family finances. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(2), 127–146.
doi: 10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00012-X