Impact of pharmacist-evaluated clinical decision support system alerts on potentially missing or inappropriately prescribed proton pump inhibitors at hospital discharge: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Clinical decision support systems
Electronic health records
Hospital
Medication safety
Patient safety
Proton pump inhibitors
Journal
International journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN: 2210-7711
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101554912
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
15
12
2023
accepted:
26
04
2024
medline:
13
6
2024
pubmed:
13
6
2024
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most prescribed drugs. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) could improve their rational use. The impact of an electronic algorithm (e-algorithm) implemented in a CDSS on potentially missing or inappropriately prescribed PPIs at hospital discharge, its specificity and sensitivity, and the outcome of the alerts issued were analysed. An e-algorithm continuously monitored patients of a tertiary care hospital for missing or inappropriate PPIs. Following relevance assessment by a pharmacist, the alerts raised were either displayed in the patients' electronic record or dismissed. After a three-month period, all adult patients' records were retrospectively reviewed for missing or inappropriate PPIs at discharge. The results were compared with a corresponding period before CDSS introduction. Sensitivity, specificity and outcome of alerts were quantified. In a 3-month period with 5018 patients, the CDSS created 158 alerts for missing PPIs and 464 alerts for inappropriate PPIs. PPI prescribing was proposed 81 times and PPI termination 122 times, with acceptance rates of 73% and 34%, respectively. A specificity of 99.4% and sensitivity of 92.0% for missing PPIs and a specificity of 97.1% and a sensitivity of 69.7% for inappropriate PPIs were calculated. The algorithm reduced incidents of missing PPIs by 63.4% (p < 0.001) and of inappropriate PPIs by 16.2% (p = 0.022). The algorithm identified patients without necessary gastroprotection or inappropriate PPIs with high specificity and acceptable sensitivity. It positively impacted the rational use of PPIs by reducing incidents of missing and inappropriate PPIs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most prescribed drugs. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) could improve their rational use.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
The impact of an electronic algorithm (e-algorithm) implemented in a CDSS on potentially missing or inappropriately prescribed PPIs at hospital discharge, its specificity and sensitivity, and the outcome of the alerts issued were analysed.
METHOD
METHODS
An e-algorithm continuously monitored patients of a tertiary care hospital for missing or inappropriate PPIs. Following relevance assessment by a pharmacist, the alerts raised were either displayed in the patients' electronic record or dismissed. After a three-month period, all adult patients' records were retrospectively reviewed for missing or inappropriate PPIs at discharge. The results were compared with a corresponding period before CDSS introduction. Sensitivity, specificity and outcome of alerts were quantified.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In a 3-month period with 5018 patients, the CDSS created 158 alerts for missing PPIs and 464 alerts for inappropriate PPIs. PPI prescribing was proposed 81 times and PPI termination 122 times, with acceptance rates of 73% and 34%, respectively. A specificity of 99.4% and sensitivity of 92.0% for missing PPIs and a specificity of 97.1% and a sensitivity of 69.7% for inappropriate PPIs were calculated. The algorithm reduced incidents of missing PPIs by 63.4% (p < 0.001) and of inappropriate PPIs by 16.2% (p = 0.022).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The algorithm identified patients without necessary gastroprotection or inappropriate PPIs with high specificity and acceptable sensitivity. It positively impacted the rational use of PPIs by reducing incidents of missing and inappropriate PPIs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38869722
doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01746-6
pii: 10.1007/s11096-024-01746-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Swiss Association of Public Health Administration and Hospital Pharmacists (GSASA)
ID : Forschungsprojekte nationaler Tragweite 2020
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Shanika LGT, Reynolds A, Pattison S, et al. Proton pump inhibitor use: systematic review of global trends and practices. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;79:1159–72.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03534-z
pubmed: 37420019
pmcid: 10427555
Fischbach W, Malfertheiner P, Lynen Jansen P, et al. S2k-guideline Helicobacter pylori and gastroduodenal ulcer disease. Z Gastroenterol. 2016;54:327–63.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-102967
pubmed: 27512738
Malfertheiner P, Chan FKL, McColl KEL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2009;374:1449–61.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60938-7
pubmed: 19683340
Freedberg DE, Kim LS, Yang Y-X. The risks and benefits of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: expert review and best practice advice from the American gastroenterological association. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:706–15.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.031
pubmed: 28257716
Scarpignato C, Gatta L, Zullo A, et al. Effective and safe proton pump inhibitor therapy in acid-related diseases—a position paper addressing benefits and potential harms of acid suppression. BMC Med. 2016;14:179.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0718-z
pubmed: 27825371
pmcid: 5101793
Platt KD, Saini SD, Kurlander JE. Selecting the appropriate patients for proton pump inhibitor discontinuation: a teachable moment. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:1276–7.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2382
pubmed: 31259999
pmcid: 9903296
Pourhadi N, Janbek J, Jensen-Dahm C, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and dementia: a nationwide population-based study. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(2):837–45.
doi: 10.1002/alz.13477
pubmed: 37795826
Philippoteaux C, Paccou J, Chazard E, et al. Proton pump inhibitors, bone and phosphocalcic metabolism. Joint Bone Spine. 2024;91:105714.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2024.105714
pubmed: 38458487
Oshima T, Wu L, Li M, et al. Magnitude and direction of the association between Clostridium difficile infection and proton pump inhibitors in adults and pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:84–94.
doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1369-3
pubmed: 28744822
Xun X, Yin Q, Fu Y, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and the risk of community-acquired pneumonia: an updated meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacoth. 2022;56(5):524–32.
doi: 10.1177/10600280211039240
Corley DA. Safety and complications of long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy: getting closer to the truth. Gastroenterology. 2019;157:604–7.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.07.039
pubmed: 31378636
Kurlander JE, Kennedy JK, Rubenstein JH, et al. Patients’ perceptions of proton pump inhibitor risks and attempts at discontinuation: a national survey. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114:244–9.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000061
pubmed: 30694867
Kurlander JE, Gonzalez JJ, Saini SD. Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1711–2.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2441
pubmed: 32804191
Lassalle M, Le Tri T, Bardou M, et al. Use of proton pump inhibitors in adults in France: a nationwide drug utilization study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;76:449–57.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02810-1
pubmed: 31838548
Muheim L, Signorell A, Markun S, et al. Potentially inappropriate proton-pump inhibitor prescription in the general population: a claims-based retrospective time trend analysis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021;14:1756284821998928.
doi: 10.1177/1756284821998928
pubmed: 33948109
pmcid: 8053831
Choosing Wisely. Treating Heartburn and GERD. 2023. https://www.choosingwisely.org/patient-resources/treating-heartburn-and-gerd/ . Accessed 01 Nov 2023.
NICE - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia in adults: investigation and management. 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg184 . Accessed 01 Nov 2023.
By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society. Updated AGS beers criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;2019(67):674–94.
Abrahami D, McDonald EG, Schnitzer M, et al. Trends in prescribing patterns of proton pump inhibitors surrounding new guidelines. Ann Epidemiol. 2021;55:24–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.12.002
pubmed: 33338647
Olakotan O, Mohd Yusof M, Ezat Wan Puteh S. A systematic review on CDSS alert appropriateness. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020;270:906–10.
de Wit HAJM, Mestres Gonzalvo C, Cardenas J, et al. Evaluation of clinical rules in a standalone pharmacy based clinical decision support system for hospitalized and nursing home patients. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84:396–405.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.02.004
pubmed: 25746461
Petersen J, Jarbol D, Hallas J, et al. Can the use of computer decision support system prevent complicated ulcer among patients treated with NSAID or Aspirin? A randomised controlled trial in general practice. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:S222.
doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(17)31039-9
Gill JM, Mainous AG, Koopman RJ, et al. Impact of EHR-based clinical decision support on adherence to guidelines for patients on NSAIDs: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:22–30.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1172
pubmed: 21242557
pmcid: 3022041
Rommers MK, Teepe-Twiss IM, Guchelaar HJ. A computerized adverse drug event alerting system using clinical rules: a retrospective and prospective comparison with conventional medication surveillance in the Netherlands. Drug Saf. 2011;34(3):233–42.
Rieckert A, Becker A, Donner-Banzhof N, et al. Reduction of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors by a patient-oriented electronic decision support tool (arriba-PPI): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20:636.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3728-2
pubmed: 31752978
pmcid: 6868794
Schmidt A, Bücker B, Maas M, et al. Patients’ perspectives on a patient-oriented electronic decision support tool to reduce overuse of proton pump inhibitors (arriba-PPI): a qualitative study in primary care. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24:33.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-01991-0
pubmed: 36698061
pmcid: 9875449
Dahmke H, Fiumefreddo R, Schuetz P, et al. Tackling alert fatigue with a semi-automated clinical decision support system: quantitative evaluation and end-user survey. Swiss Med Wkly. 2023;153:40082.
doi: 10.57187/smw.2023.40082
pubmed: 37454289
Reinau D, Imbach P, Späni S, et al. Prophylaxis of gastroduodenal ulcers with high-risk medication - rational use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI)]. University Hospital Basel. 2017. Available from https://www.spitalpharmazie-basel.ch/dropbox/dropnews/files/2017-10-02-4811/Richtlinie_PPI.pdf . Accessed 03 April 2024
Damoiseaux-Volman BA, Medlock S, van der Meulen DM, et al. Clinical validation of clinical decision support systems for medication review: a scoping review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88:2035–51.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.15160
pubmed: 34837238
Berger FA, van der Sijs H, Becker ML, et al. Development and validation of a tool to assess the risk of QT drug-drug interactions in clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20:171.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01181-3
pubmed: 32703198
pmcid: 7376881
Sattayalertyanyong O, Thitilertdecha P, Auesomwang C. The inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors during admission and after discharge: a prospective cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2020;42:174–83.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00955-8
pubmed: 31865594
Chen Q, Wang Q, Zhang Y. Clinical intervention increases rational use of proton pump inhibitors in the general surgery department. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 864081.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.864081
pubmed: 35548351
pmcid: 9083545
Muylle KM, Gentens K, Dupont AG, et al. Evaluation of an optimized context-aware clinical decision support system for drug-drug interaction screening. Int J Med Inform. 2021;148: 104393.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104393
pubmed: 33486355
Skalafouris C, Reny J-L, Stirnemann J, et al. Development and assessment of PharmaCheck: an electronic screening tool for the prevention of twenty major adverse drug events. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22:146.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01885-8
pubmed: 35642053
pmcid: 9154036
Krag M, Marker S, Perner A, et al. Pantoprazole in Patients at Risk for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the ICU. New England J Med Mass Medical Soc. 2018;379:2199–208.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1714919
Wang Y, Ge L, Ye Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1987–2000.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06209-w
pubmed: 32833040
Yailian AL, Huet E, Charpiat B, et al. Characteristics of pharmacists’ interventions related to proton-pump inhibitors in French hospitals: an observational study. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:9619699.
doi: 10.1155/2022/9619699
pubmed: 35846437
pmcid: 9256420
Coté GA, Rice JP, Bulsiewicz W, et al. Use of physician education and computer alert to improve targeted use of gastroprotection among NSAID users. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1097–103.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01907.x
pubmed: 18477341
Nallapeta N, Reynolds JL, Bakhai S. Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in an academic, primary care clinic: quality improvement project. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;54:864–70.
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001317
pubmed: 32091449
pmcid: 7426248