Preferences and perceptions of 617 migraine patients on acute and preventive migraine treatment attributes and clinical trial endpoints.

Acute treatment clinical endpoints migraine patient perceptions patient preferences preventive treatment

Journal

Expert review of neurotherapeutics
ISSN: 1744-8360
Titre abrégé: Expert Rev Neurother
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101129944

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 13 6 2024
pubmed: 13 6 2024
entrez: 13 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To identify the preferences and perceptions of migraine patients for acute and preventive treatment options and to investigate which treatment outcomes are the most important. The authors performed a choice-format survey in a cohort of migraine patients from Greece and Cyprus. A self-administered questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Greek Society of Migraine Patients was used. Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients' needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
To identify the preferences and perceptions of migraine patients for acute and preventive treatment options and to investigate which treatment outcomes are the most important.
DESIGN AND METHODS UNASSIGNED
The authors performed a choice-format survey in a cohort of migraine patients from Greece and Cyprus. A self-administered questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Greek Society of Migraine Patients was used.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Questionnaires were collected from 617 migraine patients. Efficacy was preferred over safety as the single most important parameter, both in acute and preventive treatment. When analyzing single outcomes, patients prioritized a complete pain remission at 1-hour post-dose for acute therapies. Regarding migraine prevention, a 75% reduction in frequency, intensity of pain, accompanying symptoms and acute medication intake were considered as most important. Conversely, outcomes routinely used in clinical trials, namely complete or partial pain remission at 2-hours post-dose for acute treatment and 50% or 30% reduction in migraine frequency for prevention, were not deemed particularly relevant. Tablet formulation was mostly preferred, both in acute and preventive treatment. Conclusion: Listening to patients' needs may add a piece of the puzzle that is generally missing in clinical practice and often explains the lack of adherence in both acute and preventative anti-migraine therapies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38870024
doi: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2365312
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-12

Auteurs

Michail Vikelis (M)

Mediterraneo Hospital Headache Clinic, Glyfada, Greece.
Greek Society of Migraine and Headache Patients, Athens, Greece.

Dimitrios Rikos (D)

404 Military Hospital, Headache Clinic, Larissa, Greece.

Andreas A Argyriou (AA)

Neurology Clinic, Patras General Hospital Agios Andreas, Patras, Greece.

Pinelopi Papachristou (P)

Agrinio Neurology Clinic, Agrinio, Greece.

Dimitrios Rallis (D)

Neurology Clinic, Peripheral General Hospital Tzaneio, Peiraias, Greece.

Theodoros Karapanayiotides (T)

2nd Department of Neurology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA Medicine Sector, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Andreas Galanopoulos (A)

Neurology Clinic, Pallini, Greece.

Konstantinos Spingos (K)

Corfu Headache Clinic, Corfu, Greece.

Nikolaos Dimisianos (N)

General Neurology Clinic, Corfu, Greece.

Emmanouil Giakoumakis (E)

NeuroCrete Neurology Clinic, Heraklion, Greece.

Periklis Zavridis (P)

Headache Clinic, Cyprus Pain Clinic, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Konstantinos Notas (K)

1st Department of Neurology, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA Medicine Sector, Thessaloniki, Greece.

George S Vlachos (GS)

Mediterraneo Hospital Headache Clinic, Glyfada, Greece.

Panagiotis Soldatos (P)

Kalamata Headache Clinic, Kalamata, Greece.

Konstantinos Bilias (K)

Greek Society of Migraine and Headache Patients, Athens, Greece.

Georgia Xiromerisiou (G)

Neurology Clinic, University of Thessaly Faculty of Medicine, Larissa, Greece.

Jobst Rudolf (J)

Neurology Department, General Hospital of Thessaloniki Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Emmanouil V Dermitzakis (EV)

Neurology Clinic, Geniki Kliniki Thessalonikis, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Alan M Rapoport (AM)

Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH