Impact of the measurement conditions and compression paddle on mammography dosimeter response.

Calibration Compression paddle Dosimetry Mammography Uncertainty

Journal

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)
ISSN: 1724-191X
Titre abrégé: Phys Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 9302888

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 11 01 2024
revised: 08 05 2024
accepted: 05 06 2024
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 13 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The effect of mammography measurement conditions was investigated to evaluate their impact on measurement uncertainties in clinical practice. The most prominent physical X-ray beam quantities i.e., - air kerma, half-value layer, and X-ray tube voltage - were examined by measuring the response of two ionization chambers and six X-ray multimeters (XMMs) of different models. Measurements were performed using several anode/filter combinations and both with and without the compression paddle in the X-ray beam. Maximum differences of higher than 6 % were found for all quantities when the dosimeter displayed value was compared with the reference value or the variation within the clinical anode/filter combinations Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh were considered. The study showed that the calibration procedure with the W/Al anode/filter combination was reliable only for ionization chambers, and the response of XMMs varies in such a way that the calibration coefficient cannot be predicted between various measurement conditions used in calibration and clinical practices. XMM calibrations are typically performed without a compression paddle in the beam, and the response of the XMM changes when radiation quality is slightly altered. If XMM specific data is not available, based on this study, an additional uncertainty of 2 % (k = 1) could be used as a typical estimate, at least for air kerma measurements. XMMs should be used for clinical measurements in mammography only with correct settings. If the correct settings are not available, the XMMs should not be used or used only with extreme caution.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38870645
pii: S1120-1797(24)00200-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103405
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103405

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Maysa Costa de Castro (M)

STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Authority, Jokiniemenkuja 1, 01370 Vantaa, Finland.

Paula Toroi (P)

STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Authority, Jokiniemenkuja 1, 01370 Vantaa, Finland; HUS HUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Electronic address: paula.toroi@stuk.fi.

Mika Kortesniemi (M)

HUS HUS Diagnostic Center, Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.

Carita Lindholm (C)

STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Authority, Jokiniemenkuja 1, 01370 Vantaa, Finland.

Massimo Pinto (M)

ENEA-INMRI, Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Santa Maria di Galeria, (RM), Italy.

Luigi Rinaldi (L)

ENEA-INMRI, Istituto Nazionale di Metrologia delle Radiazioni Ionizzanti, Via Anguillarese 301, 00123 Santa Maria di Galeria, (RM), Italy.

Aino Tietäväinen (A)

STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Authority, Jokiniemenkuja 1, 01370 Vantaa, Finland.

Joonas Tikkanen (J)

STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Authority, Jokiniemenkuja 1, 01370 Vantaa, Finland.

Miloš Živanović (M)

Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences - National Institute of the Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Mike Petrovica Alasa 12-14, 11351 Vinča, Belgrade, Serbia.

Classifications MeSH