Intravascular Ultrasound during Endovascular Intervention for Peripheral Artery Disease, By Severity, Location, Device, and Procedure.

Intravascular ultrasound peripheral artery disease peripheral vascular intervention

Journal

The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 14 12 2023
revised: 21 04 2024
accepted: 17 05 2024
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 13 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is limited evidence for the role of Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI). We conducted retrospective cohort study utilizing the HCUP-AHRQ National Readmission database(NRD) to delineate outcomes in IVUS guided PVI versus non-IVUS guided PVI. The current study utilized NRD between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. We identified patients undergoing endovascular intervention for peripheral artery disease using relevant ICD-10-PCS. The cohort was divided based on the use of IVUS during the procedure. The primary outcome was major amputation at 6 months after index hospitalization. Measured confounders were matched using propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighing method. We further performed a subgroup analysis based on disease severity, location of intervention, device, and procedure.A total of 434901 hospitalizations were included in the present analysis. PVI with IVUS compared with no IVUS had similar risk of amputation at 6 months (195 of 8939[2.17%] versus 10404 of 384003 [2.71%]);Hazard Ratio,0.98;CI, 0.77-1.25. Further, there was no difference in the rates of secondary outcomes. On subgroup analysis, amputation rates were significantly lower among patients with rest pain, in iliac intervention, or patients undergoing drug eluting stent implantation with the use of IVUS compared with no IVUS. This nationwide observational study showed that there was no difference in major amputation rates with the use of IVUS in patients undergoing PVI. However, in subgroup of patients with rest pain, iliac intervention or drug-eluting stent implantation IVUS use was associated with significantly lower major amputation rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38871159
pii: S0002-9149(24)00424-7
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.05.039
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ashish Kumar (A)

Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio.

Mariam Shariff (M)

Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minneapolis, USA.

Monil Majmundar (M)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

John M Stulak (JM)

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Nandan Anavekar (N)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Abhishek Deshmukh (A)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Riyaz Bashir (R)

Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: riyaz.bashir@tuhs.temple.edu.

Classifications MeSH