A Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Analgesia Post-Hemorrhoidectomy (TAPH Trial).


Journal

Diseases of the colon and rectum
ISSN: 1530-0358
Titre abrégé: Dis Colon Rectum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372764

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 13 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Postoperative pain remains the greatest problem after hemorrhoidectomy. Pain is hypothesized to arise from bacterial infection, sphincter spasm, and local inflammation. A randomized controlled factorial trial was conducted to assess the effects of metronidazole, diltiazem, and lidocaine on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain. A double blinded randomized controlled factorial trial. A multicenter trial was conducted in Auckland, New Zealand. 192 Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) into four parallel arms. Participants were randomized into one of four groups receiving topical treatment with 10% metronidazole (M), 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem (MD), 10% metronidazole + 4% lidocaine (ML), or 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem + 4% lidocaine (MDL). Participants were instructed to apply to the anal verge 3 times daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale on day 4. The secondary outcomes included analgesia usage, pain on bowel motion, and functional recovery index. There was no significant difference in the pain and recovery scores when diltiazem or lidocaine was added to metronidazole (score difference between presence and absence of D in the formulation: -3.69, 95% CI: -13.3, 5.94, p = 0.46; between presence and absence of L: -5.67, 95% CI: -15.5, 3.80, p = 0.24). The combination of MDL did not further reduce pain. Secondary analysis revealed a significant difference between the best (ML) and worst (MDL) groups in both pain and functional recovery scores. There were no significant differences in analgesic usage, complications, or return to work between the groups. No clinically important adverse events were reported. The adverse event rate did not change in the intervention groups. Topical metronidazole was utilized in the control group, rather than a pure placebo. There was no significant difference in pain when topical diltiazem or lidocaine, or both, was added to topical metronidazole. NCT04276298.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Postoperative pain remains the greatest problem after hemorrhoidectomy. Pain is hypothesized to arise from bacterial infection, sphincter spasm, and local inflammation.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
A randomized controlled factorial trial was conducted to assess the effects of metronidazole, diltiazem, and lidocaine on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain.
DESIGN METHODS
A double blinded randomized controlled factorial trial.
SETTINGS METHODS
A multicenter trial was conducted in Auckland, New Zealand.
PATIENTS METHODS
192 Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) into four parallel arms.
INTERVENTIONS METHODS
Participants were randomized into one of four groups receiving topical treatment with 10% metronidazole (M), 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem (MD), 10% metronidazole + 4% lidocaine (ML), or 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem + 4% lidocaine (MDL). Participants were instructed to apply to the anal verge 3 times daily for 7 days.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES METHODS
The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale on day 4. The secondary outcomes included analgesia usage, pain on bowel motion, and functional recovery index.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the pain and recovery scores when diltiazem or lidocaine was added to metronidazole (score difference between presence and absence of D in the formulation: -3.69, 95% CI: -13.3, 5.94, p = 0.46; between presence and absence of L: -5.67, 95% CI: -15.5, 3.80, p = 0.24). The combination of MDL did not further reduce pain. Secondary analysis revealed a significant difference between the best (ML) and worst (MDL) groups in both pain and functional recovery scores. There were no significant differences in analgesic usage, complications, or return to work between the groups. No clinically important adverse events were reported. The adverse event rate did not change in the intervention groups.
LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Topical metronidazole was utilized in the control group, rather than a pure placebo.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
There was no significant difference in pain when topical diltiazem or lidocaine, or both, was added to topical metronidazole.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION IDENTIFIER UNASSIGNED
NCT04276298.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38871679
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003419
pii: 00003453-990000000-00669
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04276298']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH