A Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Analgesia Post-Hemorrhoidectomy (TAPH Trial).
Journal
Diseases of the colon and rectum
ISSN: 1530-0358
Titre abrégé: Dis Colon Rectum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372764
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Jun 2024
11 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline:
14
6
2024
pubmed:
14
6
2024
entrez:
13
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Postoperative pain remains the greatest problem after hemorrhoidectomy. Pain is hypothesized to arise from bacterial infection, sphincter spasm, and local inflammation. A randomized controlled factorial trial was conducted to assess the effects of metronidazole, diltiazem, and lidocaine on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain. A double blinded randomized controlled factorial trial. A multicenter trial was conducted in Auckland, New Zealand. 192 Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) into four parallel arms. Participants were randomized into one of four groups receiving topical treatment with 10% metronidazole (M), 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem (MD), 10% metronidazole + 4% lidocaine (ML), or 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem + 4% lidocaine (MDL). Participants were instructed to apply to the anal verge 3 times daily for 7 days. The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale on day 4. The secondary outcomes included analgesia usage, pain on bowel motion, and functional recovery index. There was no significant difference in the pain and recovery scores when diltiazem or lidocaine was added to metronidazole (score difference between presence and absence of D in the formulation: -3.69, 95% CI: -13.3, 5.94, p = 0.46; between presence and absence of L: -5.67, 95% CI: -15.5, 3.80, p = 0.24). The combination of MDL did not further reduce pain. Secondary analysis revealed a significant difference between the best (ML) and worst (MDL) groups in both pain and functional recovery scores. There were no significant differences in analgesic usage, complications, or return to work between the groups. No clinically important adverse events were reported. The adverse event rate did not change in the intervention groups. Topical metronidazole was utilized in the control group, rather than a pure placebo. There was no significant difference in pain when topical diltiazem or lidocaine, or both, was added to topical metronidazole. NCT04276298.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pain remains the greatest problem after hemorrhoidectomy. Pain is hypothesized to arise from bacterial infection, sphincter spasm, and local inflammation.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
A randomized controlled factorial trial was conducted to assess the effects of metronidazole, diltiazem, and lidocaine on post-hemorrhoidectomy pain.
DESIGN
METHODS
A double blinded randomized controlled factorial trial.
SETTINGS
METHODS
A multicenter trial was conducted in Auckland, New Zealand.
PATIENTS
METHODS
192 Participants were randomized (1:1:1:1) into four parallel arms.
INTERVENTIONS
METHODS
Participants were randomized into one of four groups receiving topical treatment with 10% metronidazole (M), 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem (MD), 10% metronidazole + 4% lidocaine (ML), or 10% metronidazole + 2% diltiazem + 4% lidocaine (MDL). Participants were instructed to apply to the anal verge 3 times daily for 7 days.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
METHODS
The primary outcome was pain on the visual analogue scale on day 4. The secondary outcomes included analgesia usage, pain on bowel motion, and functional recovery index.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in the pain and recovery scores when diltiazem or lidocaine was added to metronidazole (score difference between presence and absence of D in the formulation: -3.69, 95% CI: -13.3, 5.94, p = 0.46; between presence and absence of L: -5.67, 95% CI: -15.5, 3.80, p = 0.24). The combination of MDL did not further reduce pain. Secondary analysis revealed a significant difference between the best (ML) and worst (MDL) groups in both pain and functional recovery scores. There were no significant differences in analgesic usage, complications, or return to work between the groups. No clinically important adverse events were reported. The adverse event rate did not change in the intervention groups.
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Topical metronidazole was utilized in the control group, rather than a pure placebo.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
There was no significant difference in pain when topical diltiazem or lidocaine, or both, was added to topical metronidazole.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION IDENTIFIER
UNASSIGNED
NCT04276298.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38871679
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003419
pii: 00003453-990000000-00669
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04276298']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.