Valuation and perception of the costs of climate change on health.

Climate change costs health willingness to pay

Journal

Scandinavian journal of public health
ISSN: 1651-1905
Titre abrégé: Scand J Public Health
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 100883503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 14 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Climate change affects our societies and lives through our economies, our livelihoods, and our health. Economic losses of climate change are estimated at $23 trillion, largely through externalities due to premature mortality, healthcare expenditure, and health-related work losses. Even if there are established methods to quantify the health economic burden, there is limited information on how people perceive this information. The current study aimed to examine different health cost evaluation methods and observe perceptions of stakeholders in the climate change context. The participatory research approach of the World Café with 41 participants was applied to explore four topics associated with valuing the costs of climate change. The data were analyzed following an inductive approach. Despite the willingness-to-pay approach being widely applied, many experts see actual healthcare costs as a more explicit indicator of costs; however, this approach might underestimate actual costs. Participants experienced difficulties accepting and understanding cost estimates that indicated very high externalities as a percentage of gross domestic product. The cost-effectiveness of mitigation and adaptation measures was also challenged by a concern that while the costs of such measures are incurred now, the benefits do not come to fruition until later, for example, when building bike lanes or dams. Policies should favor environmentally friendly activities such as making cycling more convenient in cities with the health benefits presented in monetary terms, while limiting car driving. Moreover, the public might better understand the costs of climate change via tools that map how solutions influence different sectors and outlining the costs in evaluating the benefits for health and the environment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS UNASSIGNED
Climate change affects our societies and lives through our economies, our livelihoods, and our health. Economic losses of climate change are estimated at $23 trillion, largely through externalities due to premature mortality, healthcare expenditure, and health-related work losses. Even if there are established methods to quantify the health economic burden, there is limited information on how people perceive this information. The current study aimed to examine different health cost evaluation methods and observe perceptions of stakeholders in the climate change context.
METHOD UNASSIGNED
The participatory research approach of the World Café with 41 participants was applied to explore four topics associated with valuing the costs of climate change. The data were analyzed following an inductive approach.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Despite the willingness-to-pay approach being widely applied, many experts see actual healthcare costs as a more explicit indicator of costs; however, this approach might underestimate actual costs. Participants experienced difficulties accepting and understanding cost estimates that indicated very high externalities as a percentage of gross domestic product. The cost-effectiveness of mitigation and adaptation measures was also challenged by a concern that while the costs of such measures are incurred now, the benefits do not come to fruition until later, for example, when building bike lanes or dams.
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
Policies should favor environmentally friendly activities such as making cycling more convenient in cities with the health benefits presented in monetary terms, while limiting car driving. Moreover, the public might better understand the costs of climate change via tools that map how solutions influence different sectors and outlining the costs in evaluating the benefits for health and the environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38872491
doi: 10.1177/14034948241247614
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

14034948241247614

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Zuzana Nordeng (Z)

Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Hedi K Kriit (HK)

Section of Sustainable Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Health Economics and Health Financing Group, Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Climate-Sensitive Infectious Disease lab, Interdisciplinary Centre of Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Climate-smart Health Systems, Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Helen Poltimäe (H)

School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartumaa, Estonia.

Kristin Aunan (K)

CICERO Center for International Climate Research, Oslo, Norway.

Miriam S Dahl (MS)

CICERO Center for International Climate Research, Oslo, Norway.

Marija Jevtic (M)

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Public Health of Vojvodina, Serbia.
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Research Centre on Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium.

Vlatka Matkovic (V)

Health & Environment Alliance, Brussels, Belgium.

Gunnell Sandanger (G)

CICERO Center for International Climate Research, Oslo, Norway.

Hans Orru (H)

Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Tartumaa, Estonia.

Classifications MeSH