Treatment free remission (TFR) after second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (2G-TKIs) treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML): from feasibility to safety.

Chronic myeloid leukemia second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs); deep molecular responses treatment-free remission

Journal

Expert opinion on drug safety
ISSN: 1744-764X
Titre abrégé: Expert Opin Drug Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101163027

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 14 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) prevalence is currently increasing due to the great efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Discontinuation of treatment in the long-term, owing to avoid off-target side effects or treatment-free remission (TFR), has become an additional treatment goal in CML patients who achieved a deep molecular response (DMR). Second-generation TKIs (2 G-TKIs) have a significantly higher rate of DMR than imatinib. Hence, especially in young patients with a strategy of TFR, 2 G-TKIs are becoming the most frequently used TKIs and may increase TFR attempts in the future. In this review, the main findings extrapolated from clinical trials and real-life evidence regarding 2 G-TKIs discontinuation were discussed, through broad research on Medline, Embase and archives from EHA and ASH congresses. Overall TFR rate after 2 G-TKIs is ranging from 40% to 60% for selected patients with sustained DMR and it can be considered a safe procedure, that have become, nowadays, a daily practice. However, many crucial aspects regarding treatment choices, timings, as well as predictive factors, patient communication and optimal strategies need to be better clarified to improve successful TFR rate.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38873693
doi: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2368822
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Alessandro Laganà (A)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Emilia Scalzulli (E)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Maria Laura Bisegna (ML)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Ida Carmosino (I)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Claudia Ielo (C)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Alessandro Costa (A)

Hematology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Businco Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Lorenzo Torrieri (L)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Matteo Totaro (M)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Maurizio Martelli (M)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Massimo Breccia (M)

Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Classifications MeSH