Phantomless calibration of CT scans for hip fracture risk prediction in silico: Comparison with phantom-based calibration.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 11 01 2024
accepted: 30 05 2024
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 14 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Finite element models built from quantitative computed tomography images rely on element-wise mapping of material properties starting from Hounsfield Units (HU), which can be converted into mineral densities upon calibration. While calibration is preferably carried out by scanning a phantom with known-density components, conducting phantom-based calibration may not always be possible. In such cases, a phantomless procedure, where the scanned subject's tissues are used as a phantom, is an interesting alternative. The aim of this study was to compare a phantom-based and a phantomless calibration method on 41 postmenopausal women. The proposed phantomless calibration utilized air, adipose, and muscle tissues, with reference equivalent mineral density values of -797, -95, and 38 mg/cm3, extracted from a previously performed phantom-based calibration. A 9-slice volume of interest (VOI) centred between the femoral head and knee rotation centres was chosen. Reference HU values for air, adipose, and muscle tissues were extracted by identifying HU distribution peaks within the VOI, and patient-specific calibration was performed using linear regression. Comparison of FE models calibrated with the two methods showed average relative differences of 1.99% for Young's modulus1.30% for tensile and 1.34% for compressive principal strains. Excellent correlations (R2 > 0.99) were identified for superficial maximum tensile and minimum compressive strains. Maximum normalised root mean square relative error (RMSRE) values settled at 4.02% for Young's modulus, 2.99% for tensile, and 3.22% for compressive principal strains, respectively. The good agreement found between the two methods supports the adoption of the proposed methodology when phantomless calibration is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38875268
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305474
pii: PONE-D-23-42894
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0305474

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Szyszko et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Julia A Szyszko (JA)

Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Alessandra Aldieri (A)

Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
PolitoBIOMed Lab, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.

Antonino A La Mattina (AA)

Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Marco Viceconti (M)

Medical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH