A combination weighting method for debris flow risk assessment based on t-distribution and linear programming optimization algorithm.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 17 01 2024
accepted: 29 04 2024
medline: 14 6 2024
pubmed: 14 6 2024
entrez: 14 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Debris flow risk assessment can provide some reference for debris flow prevention and control projects. In risk assessment, researchers often only focus on the impact of objective or subjective indicators. For this purpose, this paper proposed a weight calculation method based on t-distribution and linear programming optimization algorithm (LPOA). Taking 72 mudslides in Beichuan County as an example, this paper used analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy weight method (EWM) and variation coefficient method (VCM) to obtain the initial weights. Based on the initial weights, weight intervals with different confidence levels were obtained by t-distribution. Subsequently, the final weights were obtained by LOPA in the 90% confidence interval. Finally, the final weights were used to calculate the risk score for each debris flow, thus delineating the level of risk for each debris flow. The results showed that this paper's method can avoid overemphasizing the importance of a particular indicator compared to EWM and VCM. In contrast, EWM and VCM ignored the effect of debris flow frequency on debris flow risk. The assessment results showed that the 72 debris flows in Beichuan County were mainly dominated by moderate and light risks. Of these, there were 8 high risk debris flows, 24 medium risk debris flows, and 40 light risk debris flows. The excellent triggering conditions provide favorable conditions for the formation of high-risk debris flows. Slightly and moderate risk debris flows are mainly located on both sides of highways and rivers, still posing a minor threat to Beichuan County. The proposed fusion weighting method effectively avoids the limitations of single weight calculating method. Through comparison and data analysis, the rationality of the proposed method is verified, which can provide some reference for combination weighting method and debris flow risk assessment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38875305
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303698
pii: PONE-D-24-02175
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0303698

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Li Li (L)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Hanjie Lin (H)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Yue Qiang (Y)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Yi Zhang (Y)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Shengchao Hu (S)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Hongjian Li (H)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Siyu Liang (S)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Xinlong Xu (X)

Civil Engineering College, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Humans Neoplasms Male Female Middle Aged
Humans Male Female Aged Middle Aged
1.00
Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature

Classifications MeSH