Psoriasis induced by antiTNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Therapeutic management and evolution of both diseases in a nationwide cohort study.
Anti-tumour necrosis factor α
Inflammatory bowel disease
Psoriasis induced by antiTNF
Journal
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
ISSN: 1878-3562
Titre abrégé: Dig Liver Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 100958385
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
30
12
2023
revised:
19
05
2024
accepted:
20
05
2024
medline:
15
6
2024
pubmed:
15
6
2024
entrez:
14
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with antiTNF develop drug-induced psoriasis (antiTNF-IP). Several therapeutic strategies are possible. to assess the management of antiTNF-IP in IBD, and its impact in both diseases. patients with antiTNF-IP from ENEIDA registry were included. Therapeutic strategy was classified as continuing the same antiTNF, stopping antiTNF, switch to another antiTNF or swap to a non-antiTNF biologic. IP severity and IBD activity were assessed at baseline and 16, 32 and 54 weeks. 234 patients were included. At baseline, antiTNF-IP was moderate-severe in 60 % of them, and IBD was in remission in 80 %. Therapeutic strategy was associated to antiTNF-IP severity (p < 0.001). AntiTNF-IP improved at week 54 with all strategies, but continuing with the same antiTNF showed the worst results (p = 0.042). Among patients with IBD in remission, relapse was higher in those who stopped antiTNF (p = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, stopping antiTNF, trunk and palms and soles location were associated with antiTNF-IP remission; female sex and previous surgery in Crohn´s disease with IBD relapse. skin lesions severity and IBD activity seem to determine antiTNF-IP management. Continuing antiTNF in mild antiTNF-IP, and swap to ustekinumab or switch to another antiTNF in moderate-severe cases, are suitable strategies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with antiTNF develop drug-induced psoriasis (antiTNF-IP). Several therapeutic strategies are possible.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
to assess the management of antiTNF-IP in IBD, and its impact in both diseases.
METHODS
METHODS
patients with antiTNF-IP from ENEIDA registry were included. Therapeutic strategy was classified as continuing the same antiTNF, stopping antiTNF, switch to another antiTNF or swap to a non-antiTNF biologic. IP severity and IBD activity were assessed at baseline and 16, 32 and 54 weeks.
RESULTS
RESULTS
234 patients were included. At baseline, antiTNF-IP was moderate-severe in 60 % of them, and IBD was in remission in 80 %. Therapeutic strategy was associated to antiTNF-IP severity (p < 0.001). AntiTNF-IP improved at week 54 with all strategies, but continuing with the same antiTNF showed the worst results (p = 0.042). Among patients with IBD in remission, relapse was higher in those who stopped antiTNF (p = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, stopping antiTNF, trunk and palms and soles location were associated with antiTNF-IP remission; female sex and previous surgery in Crohn´s disease with IBD relapse.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
skin lesions severity and IBD activity seem to determine antiTNF-IP management. Continuing antiTNF in mild antiTNF-IP, and swap to ustekinumab or switch to another antiTNF in moderate-severe cases, are suitable strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38876834
pii: S1590-8658(24)00779-5
doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.05.021
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest DCD is partially supported by a Rio-Hortega fellowship from Instituto de Salud Carlos III. IM reports grants and personal fees from MSD, Janssen, Takeda, Kern and Chiesi, during the conduct of the study. AFC has served as a speaker, or has received education funding from Dr. Falk, Janssen, Takeda, Chiesi and Pfizer. MJG has received financial support for travelling and educational activities from Janssen, Pfizer, AbbVie, Takeda, Kern Pharma, Faes Farma and Ferring. IG has served as speaker or has received education funding from Takeda and Tillots. JPG has served as speaker, consultant, and advisory member for or has received research funding from MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern Pharma, Biogen, Mylan, Takeda, Janssen, Roche, Sandoz, Celgene/Bristol Myers, Gilead/Galapagos, Lilly, Ferring, Faes Farma, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Dr. Falk Pharma, Tillotts Pharma, Chiesi, Casen Fleet, Gebro Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Norgine and Vifor Pharma. XC reports grants or contracts from Abbvie, Janssen, Kern, Takeda, Galapagos, Lilly, Sandoz; consulting fees from Janssen; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events: AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Galapagos, Kern; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: X Jansen, Galapagos; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid: Past-president, Societat Catalana de Digestologia. BG has served as advisor to Galapagos and Abbvie and as speaker for Abbvie, Jansen, Takeda, Pfizer and Galapagos. REM reports grants and personal fees from Janssen, Pfizer and Ferring. NP has served as speaker, consultant and advisory board of has received research funding from MSD, Abbvie, Janssen, Takeda, Roche, Sandoz, Ferring, Adacyte, Faes Farma, Kern Pharma, Pfizer, Shire Pharmaceuticals, Vifor Pharma, Chiesi and Tillots. SGL has served as a speaker, advisory member for or has received research funding from AbbVie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen and Pfizer.