CaRDS - the statewide California Residential water Demand and Supply open dataset.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jun 2024
14 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
15
12
2023
accepted:
04
06
2024
medline:
15
6
2024
pubmed:
15
6
2024
entrez:
14
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As water scarcity becomes the new norm in the Western United States, states such as California have increased their efforts to improve water resilience. Achieving water security under climate change, population growth, and urbanization requires an integrated multi-sectoral approach, where adaptation strategies combine supply and demand management interventions. Yet, most studies consider supply-side and demand-side management strategies separately. Water conservation efforts are mainly driven by policy requirements and publicly available data to assess the effectiveness of demand- and supply-side management policies is often hard to find and unstructured. Here we present CaRDS - the statewide California Residential water Demand and Supply open dataset. CaRDS encompasses nine years (2013-2021) of monthly water supply and demand time series for 404 water suppliers in California, USA, compiled from different open-access data sources. Access to detailed temporal and spatial water supply operations and demands at the state-level can be useful to researchers and practitioners to realize applications such as evaluating the effectiveness of water conservation policies and discovering regional differences in water resilience measures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38876995
doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03474-y
pii: 10.1038/s41597-024-03474-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Dataset
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
632Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Zhang, F. et al. Five decades of observed daily precipitation reveal longer and more variable drought events across much of the western United States. Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2020GL092293 (2021).
doi: 10.1029/2020GL092293
Greve, P. et al. Global assessment of water challenges under uncertainty in water scarcity projections. Nature Sustainability 1, 486–494 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0134-9
Vicuna, S., Maurer, E. P., Joyce, B., Dracup, J. A. & Purkey, D. The sensitivity of California water resources to climate change scenarios 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43, 482–498 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00038.x
Fu, X. & Tang, Z. Planning for drought-resilient communities: An evaluation of local comprehensive plans in the fastest growing counties in the US. Cities 32, 60–69 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.001
Furlong, C., Brotchie, R., Considine, R., Finlayson, G. & Guthrie, L. Key concepts for integrated urban water management infrastructure planning: lessons from Melbourne. Utilities Policy 45, 84–96 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2017.02.004
Mitchell, D. et al. Building drought resilience in California’s cities and suburbs. Public Policy Institute of California 1–49 (2017).
Cahill, R. & Lund, J. Residential water conservation in Australia and California. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 139, 117–121 (2013).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000225
Hanak, E. Managing California’s water: From conflict to reconciliation (Public Policy Instit. of CA, 2011).
Quinn, T. Forty years of California water policy: What worked, what didn’t and lessons for the future (2019).
California State Assembly. Assembly bill no. 1668. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180AB1668 (2018).
California State Senate. Senate bill no. 606. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB606 (2018).
California State Water Resources Control Board. Water conservation portal. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/conservation_portal/conservation_reporting.html Accessed on 21.11.2023 (2023).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data 3, 1–9 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Zounemat-Kermani, M. et al. Neurocomputing in surface water hydrology and hydraulics: A review of two decades retrospective, current status and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology 588, 125085 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125085
Daniel, I. et al. A survey of water utilities’ digital transformation: drivers, impacts, and enabling technologies. npj Clean Water 6, 51 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41545-023-00265-7
Stagge, J. H. et al. Assessing data availability and research reproducibility in hydrology and water resources. Scientific data 6, 1–12 (2019).
California State Water Resources Control Board. Electronic annual report. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/ear.html Accessed on 21.04.2023 (2023).
PRISM Climate Group, Oregon State University. PRISM time series data. https://prism.oregonstate.edu Accessed on 05.07.2023 (2023).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Historical palmer drought severity indices. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/cirs/climdiv/ Accessed on 27.06.2023 (2023).
Palmer, W. C.Meteorological drought, vol. Res. Paper No.45 (US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, 1965).
Gross, M., Escriva-Bou, A., Porse, E., & Cominola, A. CaRDS - the statewide California residential water demand and supply open dataset, HydroShare, https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.4ec7019fe63944bf87d40d2cdfa0d686 (2024).
Tukey, J. W.Exploratory data analysis (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1977).
Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C. & Ljung, G. M.Time series analysis: forecasting and control (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).
Ester, M. et al. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In kdd, vol. 96, 226–231 (1996).
Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic reviews 10, 1–11 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4