A Leadless Ventricular Pacemaker Providing Atrioventricular Synchronous Pacing in the Real-World Setting: 12-Month Results from the Micra AV Post-Approval Registry.

atrioventricular block atrioventricular synchronous pacing bradycardia clinical trial leadless pacing

Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 09 05 2024
revised: 06 06 2024
accepted: 07 06 2024
medline: 16 6 2024
pubmed: 16 6 2024
entrez: 15 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Advances in leadless pacemaker technology have enabled accelerometer-based atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing by sensing atrial mechanical contraction. To report performance of the Micra AV leadless pacemaker from the worldwide Micra AV post-approval registry (PAR) through 12-months. The Micra AV PAR is a prospective single-arm observational registry designed to assess safety and effectiveness of Micra AV in a real-world setting. For the present interim analysis, major complications and system revisions through 12-months were summarized and compared to a historical cohort of 2,667 transvenous dual-chamber pacing patients. The device was successfully implanted in 796 of 801 patients (99.4%) at 97 centers in 19 countries. Micra AV patients were older (74.1 vs. 71.1 years, P<0.0001) with a higher incidence of renal disease (22.3% vs. 9.8%, P<0.0001) compared to transvenous dual-chamber patients. Through 12-months, the major complication rate was 3.7% in Micra AV patients compared to 8.8% in transvenous dual-chamber patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.61; P<0.001). The system revision rate was 1.5% in Micra AV patients compared to 5.5% for transvenous dual-chamber patients (HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.13-0.47; P<0.001); this reduction was largely driven by the absence of lead dislodgements requiring revision. Median AV synchrony index was 79.4% (IQR:65.2%-86.4%) among patients paced >90%. The Micra AV leadless pacemaker was implanted with a high rate of success in patients with multiple co-morbidities, with a significantly lower rate of complications and system revisions through 12-months compared to a historical cohort of patients with transvenous dual-chamber pacemakers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Advances in leadless pacemaker technology have enabled accelerometer-based atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing by sensing atrial mechanical contraction.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To report performance of the Micra AV leadless pacemaker from the worldwide Micra AV post-approval registry (PAR) through 12-months.
METHODS METHODS
The Micra AV PAR is a prospective single-arm observational registry designed to assess safety and effectiveness of Micra AV in a real-world setting. For the present interim analysis, major complications and system revisions through 12-months were summarized and compared to a historical cohort of 2,667 transvenous dual-chamber pacing patients.
RESULTS RESULTS
The device was successfully implanted in 796 of 801 patients (99.4%) at 97 centers in 19 countries. Micra AV patients were older (74.1 vs. 71.1 years, P<0.0001) with a higher incidence of renal disease (22.3% vs. 9.8%, P<0.0001) compared to transvenous dual-chamber patients. Through 12-months, the major complication rate was 3.7% in Micra AV patients compared to 8.8% in transvenous dual-chamber patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.61; P<0.001). The system revision rate was 1.5% in Micra AV patients compared to 5.5% for transvenous dual-chamber patients (HR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.13-0.47; P<0.001); this reduction was largely driven by the absence of lead dislodgements requiring revision. Median AV synchrony index was 79.4% (IQR:65.2%-86.4%) among patients paced >90%.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Micra AV leadless pacemaker was implanted with a high rate of success in patients with multiple co-morbidities, with a significantly lower rate of complications and system revisions through 12-months compared to a historical cohort of patients with transvenous dual-chamber pacemakers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38878939
pii: S1547-5271(24)02684-5
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.06.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Christophe Garweg (C)

University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;. Electronic address: christophe.garweg@uzleuven.be.

Jason S Chinitz (JS)

Northwell New Hyde Park, New York.

Eloi Marijon (E)

European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France.

Andreas Haeberlin (A)

Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Stefan Winter (S)

Saint Vinzenz Hospital, Cologne, Germany.

Saverio Iacopino (S)

Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.

Antonio Curnis (A)

Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Alexander Breitenstein (A)

University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Azlan Hussin (A)

Institut Jantung Negara, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Theofanie Mela (T)

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Mikhael F El-Chami (MF)

Emory University Medical School, Atlanta, Georgia.

Paul R Roberts (PR)

University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Jonathan P Piccini (JP)

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Kurt Stromberg (K)

Medtronic, Inc., Mounds View, Minnesota.

Dedra H Fagan (DH)

Medtronic, Inc., Mounds View, Minnesota.

Nicolas Clementy (N)

Clinique du Millénaire, Montpellier, France.

Classifications MeSH