Impact of GVHD on relapse and non-relapse mortality following post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based transplantation.


Journal

Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 08 04 2024
revised: 09 06 2024
accepted: 11 06 2024
medline: 16 6 2024
pubmed: 16 6 2024
entrez: 15 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Following conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, the development of acute and/or chronic GVHD is associated with lower relapse rates. However, the effects of GVHD on relapse and non-relapse mortality following post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis have not been well studied. To this end, we analyzed the impact of acute and chronic GVHD following PTCy-based haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT). The analysis included 335 consecutive HIDT recipients transplanted at a single institution between 2005 and 2021. Landmark analysis (LA) and time-dependent multivariable analysis (MVA) were utilized to study the impact of GVHD development on transplant outcome. Landmarks were defined as Day +100 for acute GVHD and one-year for chronic GVHD. Recipient characteristics included a median age of 50 (19-80) years, most commonly transplanted for acute leukemia[/MDS [242]. PBSC was the graft source in 81%, and regimen intensity was myeloablative in 49%. Median follow-up was 65 (23-207) months. In landmark analysis, development of grade 3-4 acute GVHD (vs. 0-1) was associated with inferior 3-yr overall survival (OS 47% vs. 64%, p=0.041), due to higher NRM (25% vs. 10%, p=0.013). In contrast, development of grade 2 acute GVHD had no significant effect on NRM or survival. When restricted to acute leukemia/MDS patients, development of grade II acute GVHD was associated with improved OS (79% vs. 58%, p=0.027) and a trend towards lower relapse (24% vs. 36%, p=0.08). Development of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD resulted in significantly higher NRM (15% vs. 4%, p=0.010), but had no impact on relapse, DFS or OS. In Cox multivariate analysis (MVA), grade 3-4 acute GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were both associated with significantly higher NRM (HR 3.38, p<0.001 and HR3.35, p<0.001, respectively). In addition, grade 3-4 acute GVHD predicted worse OS (HR 1.80, p=0.007) and DFS (HR 1.55, p=0.041). In contrast, relapse was not impacted by acute or chronic GVHD in MVA. Grade 2 acute GVHD was not associated with transplant outcome in MVA. In summary, both grade 3-4 acute and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were associated with higher NRM after PTCy-based HIDT, without an effect on relapse risk. Methods of early identification of such patients in order to augment GVHD prophylaxis are clearly needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Following conventional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, the development of acute and/or chronic GVHD is associated with lower relapse rates. However, the effects of GVHD on relapse and non-relapse mortality following post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis have not been well studied.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To this end, we analyzed the impact of acute and chronic GVHD following PTCy-based haploidentical donor transplantation (HIDT).
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
The analysis included 335 consecutive HIDT recipients transplanted at a single institution between 2005 and 2021. Landmark analysis (LA) and time-dependent multivariable analysis (MVA) were utilized to study the impact of GVHD development on transplant outcome. Landmarks were defined as Day +100 for acute GVHD and one-year for chronic GVHD.
RESULTS RESULTS
Recipient characteristics included a median age of 50 (19-80) years, most commonly transplanted for acute leukemia[/MDS [242]. PBSC was the graft source in 81%, and regimen intensity was myeloablative in 49%. Median follow-up was 65 (23-207) months. In landmark analysis, development of grade 3-4 acute GVHD (vs. 0-1) was associated with inferior 3-yr overall survival (OS 47% vs. 64%, p=0.041), due to higher NRM (25% vs. 10%, p=0.013). In contrast, development of grade 2 acute GVHD had no significant effect on NRM or survival. When restricted to acute leukemia/MDS patients, development of grade II acute GVHD was associated with improved OS (79% vs. 58%, p=0.027) and a trend towards lower relapse (24% vs. 36%, p=0.08). Development of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD resulted in significantly higher NRM (15% vs. 4%, p=0.010), but had no impact on relapse, DFS or OS. In Cox multivariate analysis (MVA), grade 3-4 acute GVHD and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were both associated with significantly higher NRM (HR 3.38, p<0.001 and HR3.35, p<0.001, respectively). In addition, grade 3-4 acute GVHD predicted worse OS (HR 1.80, p=0.007) and DFS (HR 1.55, p=0.041). In contrast, relapse was not impacted by acute or chronic GVHD in MVA. Grade 2 acute GVHD was not associated with transplant outcome in MVA.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In summary, both grade 3-4 acute and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were associated with higher NRM after PTCy-based HIDT, without an effect on relapse risk. Methods of early identification of such patients in order to augment GVHD prophylaxis are clearly needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38879167
pii: S2666-6367(24)00472-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest There are no competing financial interests in relation to the work described.

Auteurs

Scott R Solomon (SR)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: ssolomon@bmtga.com.

Lizamarie Bachier-Rodriguez (L)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.

Asad Bashey (A)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.

Xu Zhang (X)

School of Public Health, University of Texas, Houston, TX.

Katelin C Jackson (KC)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.

H Kent Holland (HK)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.

Lawrence E Morris (LE)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.

Melhem M Solh (MM)

The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.

Classifications MeSH