Identification of Retracted Publications and Completeness of Retraction Notices in Public Health.

Retraction is intended to be a mechanism to correct the published body of knowledge when necessary due to fraudulent, fatally flawed or ethically unacceptable publications. However, the success of this mechanism requires that retracted publications be consistently identified as such and that retraction notices contain sufficient information to understand what is being retracted and why. Our study investigated how clearly and consistently retracted publications in public health are being presented to researchers. This is a cross-sectional study, using 441 retracted research publications in the field of public health. Records were retrieved for each of these publications from 11 resources, while retraction notices were retrieved from publisher websites and full-text aggregators. The identification of the retracted status of the publication was assessed using criteria from the Council on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the National Library of Medicine (NLM). The completeness of the associated retraction notices was assessed using criteria from COPE and Retraction Watch. 2841 records for retracted publications were retrieved, of which less than half indicated that the article had been retracted. Less than 5% of publications were identified as retracted through all resources through which they were available. Within single resources, if and how retracted publications were identified varied. Retraction notices were frequently incomplete, with no notices meeting all criteria. The observed inconsistencies and incomplete notices pose a threat to the integrity of scientific publishing and highlight the need to better align with existing best practices to ensure more effective and transparent dissemination of information on retractions.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.