The effect of different implant-abutment types and heights on screw loosening in cases with increased crown height space.
dental abutments
dental implant loading
dental implants
Journal
Clinical and experimental dental research
ISSN: 2057-4347
Titre abrégé: Clin Exp Dent Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101692332
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
13
04
2024
received:
05
02
2024
accepted:
23
04
2024
medline:
17
6
2024
pubmed:
17
6
2024
entrez:
17
6
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The stability of the abutment screw is pivotal for successful implant-supported restorations, yet screw loosening remains a common complication, leading to compromised function and potential implant failure. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different implant-abutment types and heights on screw loosening in cases with increased crown height space (CHS). In this in vitro study, a total of 64 abutments in eight distinct groups based on their type and height were evaluated. These groups included stock, cast, and milled abutments with heights of 4 mm (groups S4, C4, and M4), 7 mm (groups S7, C7, and M7), and 10 mm (groups C10 and M10). Removal torque loss (RTL) was assessed both before and after subjecting the abutments to dynamic cyclic loading. Additionally, the differences between initial RTL and RTL following cyclic loading were analyzed for each group (p < .05). The C10 group demonstrated the highest RTL, whereas the S4 group exhibited the lowest initial RTL percentage (p < .05). Furthermore, the study established significant variations in RTL percentages and the discrepancies between initial and postcyclic loading RTL across different abutment groups (p < .05). Additionally, both abutment types and heights were found to significantly influence the RTL percentage (p < .05). The type and height of the implant abutment affected screw loosening, and in an increased CHS of 12 mm, using a stock abutment with a postheight of 4 mm can be effective in minimizing screw loosening.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e894Subventions
Organisme : Guilan University of Medical Sciences
ID : IR.GUMS.REC.1400.043
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ahmed, S. E., Krishnan, C. S., Mohan, J., & Kalaignan, P. (2019). Effect of cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening in angled implant abutments‐an in‐vitro study. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 13.
Attiah, E. M. N., AlGendy, A. A., & Mostafa, T. M. N. (2020). Effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants (in‐vitro study). International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6, 30.
Bagegni, A., Spies, B. C., Kern, M., Hazard, D., & Kohal, R. (2021). The influence of prosthetic crown height and implant‐abutment connection design selection on the long‐term implant‐abutment stability: A laboratory study. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 113:104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104095
Bordin, D., Cury, A. A. D. B., & Faot, F. (2019). Influence of abutment collar height and implant length on stress distribution in single crowns. Brazilian Dental Journal, 30, 238–243. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902533
Bulaqi, H. A., Mousavi Mashhadi, M., Safari, H., Samandari, M. M., & Geramipanah, F. (2015). Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 113, 548–557.
Elsayed, M. E., Shakal, E., & Mostafa, T. (2021). Effect of internal hex height and collar height on marginal fit of implant abutment connection after dynamic cyclic loading: (In Vitro Study). J Int Dent Med Res, 14, 79–86.
El‐Sheikh, M. A. Y., Mostafa, T. M. N., & El‐Sheikh, M. M. (2018). Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading. International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 4, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0149-z
de Freitas, R. B., Aredes, G. D. A., & Cicareli, A. J. (2023). Dental implant and aesthetics: A systematic review. MedNEXT J Med Heal Sci.
Gao, X., Fraulob, M., & Haïat, G. (2019). Biomechanical behaviours of the bone‐implant interface: A review. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 16:20190259. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0259
Gehrke, S. A. (2015). Importance of crown height ratios in dental implants on the fracture strength of different connection designs: An in vitro study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 17, 790–797.
Graf, T., Güth, J. F., Schweiger, J., Erdelt, K. J., Edelhoff, D., & Stimmelmayr, M. (2023). Biomechanical behavior of implants with different diameters in relation to simulated bone loss—An in vitro study. Clinical Oral Investigations, 27, 5887–5894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05199-5
Hossain, N., Mobarak, M. H., Islam, M. A., Hossain, A., Al Mahmud, M. Z., Rayhan, M. T., & Chowdhury, M. A. (2023). Recent development of dental implant materials, synthesis process, and failure—A review. Results in Chemistry, 6:101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2023.101136
Huang, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). Mechanism of and factors associated with the loosening of the implant abutment screw: A review. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 31, 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12494
Jayachandran, S. (2022). Dental implant practice and education in the UK‐current challenges and future challenges.
Junqueira, M. C., Ribeiro, R. F., Faria, A. C. L., Macedo, A. P., & Almeida, R. P. (2013). Screw loosening of different UCLA‐type abutments after mechanical cycling. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, 12, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-32252013000300014
Kim, E.‐S., & Shin, S.‐Y. (2013). Influence of the implant abutment types and the dynamic loading on initial screw loosening. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 5, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.21
Kim, S. K., Koak, J. Y., Heo, S. J., Taylor, T. D., Ryoo, S., & Lee, S. Y. (2012). Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 27, 42–47.
Kourtis, S., Damanaki, M., Kaitatzidou, S., Kaitatzidou, A., & Roussou, V. (2017). Loosening of the fixing screw in single implant crowns: predisposing factors, prevention and treatment options. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 29, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12303
Lee, K.‐Y., Shin, K. S., Jung, J.‐H., Cho, H. W., Kwon, K. H., & Kim, Y. L. (2020). Clinical study on screw loosening in dental implant prostheses: a 6‐year retrospective study. Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 46, 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.2.133
Londhe, S. M., Gowda, E. M., Mandlik, V. B., & Shashidhar, M. P. (2020). Factors associated with abutment screw loosening in single implant supported crowns: A cross‐sectional study. Medical Journal, Armed Forces India, 76, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.06.011
Nakano, R., Homma, S., Takanashi, T., Hirano, T., Furuya, Y., & Yajima, Y. (2021). Influence of eccentric cyclic loading on implant components: Comparison between titanium and zirconia abutments. Dental Materials Journal, 40, 235–244.
Naseri, N., Babasafari, A., Jalalian, E., Mazaheri, A., & Zarbakhsh, A. (2021). Effects of cyclic loading on screw loosening, vertical misfit, and microleakage at the fixture‐angulated abutment interface. Journal of Research in Dental and Maxillofacial Sciences, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.52547/jrdms.6.4.1
Omori, Y., Lang, N. P., Botticelli, D., Papageorgiou, S. N., & Baba, S. (2020). Biological and mechanical complications of angulated abutments connected to fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 47, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12877
Park, J.‐M., Lee, J.‐B., Heo, S.‐J., & Park, E.‐J. (2014). A comparative study of gold UCLA‐type and CAD/CAM titanium implant abutments. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 6, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.46
Ramalho, I., Witek, L., Coelho, P., Bergamo, E., Pegoraro, L., & Bonfante, E. (2020). Influence of abutment fabrication method on 3D fit at the Implant‐Abutment connection. The International Journal of Prosthodontics, 33, 641–647. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6574
Saini, M. (2015). Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52
Sakamoto, K., Homma, S., Takanashi, T., Takemoto, S., Furuya, Y., Yoshinari, M., & Yajima, Y. (2016). Influence of eccentric cyclic loading on implant components: Comparison between external joint system and internal joint system. Dental Materials Journal, 35, 929–937.
Sammour, S. R., Maamoun el‐Sheikh, M., & Aly el‐Gendy, A. (2019). Effect of implant abutment connection designs, and implant diameters on screw loosening before and after cyclic loading: in‐vitro study. Dental Materials, 35, e265–e271.
Seddigh, M. A., & Mostafavi, A. S. (2019). Implant abutment screw loosening: A review of effective factors. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 13, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2019/41751.13088
Shash, M., Nazha, H., & Abbas, W. (2019). Influence of different abutment designs on the biomechanical behavior of one‐piece zirconia dental implants and their surrounding bone: A 3D‐FEA. IRBM, 40, 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.07.001
Siadat, H., Pirmoazen, S., Beyabanaki, E., & Alikhasi, M. (2015). Does abutment collar length affect abutment screw loosening after cyclic loading? Journal of Oral Implantology, 41(Spec No), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-D-14-00021
Siamos, G., Winkler, S., & Boberick, K. G. (2002). The relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant‐supported prostheses. Journal of Oral Implantology, 28, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2
Sun, X., Cheng, K., Liu, Y., Ke, S., Zhang, W., Wang, L., & Yang, F. (2023). Biomechanical comparison of all‐on‐4 and all‐on‐5 implant‐supported prostheses with alteration of anterior‐posterior spread: A three‐dimensional finite element analysis. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11:1187504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1187504
Târtea, D. A., Ionescu, M., Manolea, H. O., Mercuț, V., Obădan, E., Amărăscu, M. O., Mărășescu, P. C., Dăguci, L., & Popescu, S. M. (2023). Comparative study of dental custom CAD‐CAM implant abutments and dental implant stock abutments. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, 2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062128
Tsuge, T., & Hagiwara, Y. (2009). Influence of lateral‐oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants. Dental Materials Journal, 28, 373–381.
Vinhas, A. S., Aroso, C., Salazar, F., López‐Jarana, P., Ríos‐Santos, J. V., & Herrero‐Climent, M. (2020). Review of the mechanical behavior of different implant–abutment connections. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 8685. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228685