Comparison of transbronchial biopsy techniques using needle and forceps biopsies in lung cancer for molecular diagnostics: a prospective, randomized crossover trial.

Bronchoscopy next-generation sequencing (NGS) transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB) transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) viable cell area

Journal

Translational cancer research
ISSN: 2219-6803
Titre abrégé: Transl Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101585958

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 May 2024
Historique:
received: 18 12 2023
accepted: 14 03 2024
medline: 17 6 2024
pubmed: 17 6 2024
entrez: 17 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In lung cancer, molecular testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are needed to identify therapeutic targets and are increasingly being used in earlier stages of the disease. Despite its longstanding use, it remains unclear whether transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of peripheral lung lesions provides as adequate material for genetic testing as transbronchial forceps biopsies (TBFBs). In this study, we aim to analyze the use of TBNA using median viable cell area (MVCA) as a surrogate parameter to analyze sample quality. This prospective single-center study analyzed biopsy specimens or aspirates of patients who underwent bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy. Patients underwent bronchoscopy with TBFB and TBNA for suspected lung cancer in peripheral lung lesions. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either TBFB or TBNA as the first biopsy technique and then switched to the other. After routine workup, sample slides were digitally scanned, and MVCA was calculated by a pathologist blinded to the biopsy technique used. The primary endpoint was MVCA of TBNA versus TBFB. Secondary endpoints were complications categorized as bleeding, pneumothorax, and other. Between August 2021 and April 2022, 15 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. Six patients were included in cohort 1 and nine patients in cohort 2. A malignant diagnosis was confirmed in 11/15 (73.3%) cases, of which nine were primary lung malignancies. Overall, MVCA in samples obtained by TBFB was significantly larger than TBNA samples {TBFB-MVCA 9.80 mm Despite a significantly smaller MVCA provided by TBNA, samples were still considered feasible for NGS, indicating that TBNA represents an alternative method to obtain sufficient tumor tissue in peripheral nodules as part of the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
In lung cancer, molecular testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) are needed to identify therapeutic targets and are increasingly being used in earlier stages of the disease. Despite its longstanding use, it remains unclear whether transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of peripheral lung lesions provides as adequate material for genetic testing as transbronchial forceps biopsies (TBFBs). In this study, we aim to analyze the use of TBNA using median viable cell area (MVCA) as a surrogate parameter to analyze sample quality.
Methods UNASSIGNED
This prospective single-center study analyzed biopsy specimens or aspirates of patients who underwent bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsy. Patients underwent bronchoscopy with TBFB and TBNA for suspected lung cancer in peripheral lung lesions. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either TBFB or TBNA as the first biopsy technique and then switched to the other. After routine workup, sample slides were digitally scanned, and MVCA was calculated by a pathologist blinded to the biopsy technique used. The primary endpoint was MVCA of TBNA versus TBFB. Secondary endpoints were complications categorized as bleeding, pneumothorax, and other.
Results UNASSIGNED
Between August 2021 and April 2022, 15 patients were included in the per-protocol analysis. Six patients were included in cohort 1 and nine patients in cohort 2. A malignant diagnosis was confirmed in 11/15 (73.3%) cases, of which nine were primary lung malignancies. Overall, MVCA in samples obtained by TBFB was significantly larger than TBNA samples {TBFB-MVCA 9.80 mm
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Despite a significantly smaller MVCA provided by TBNA, samples were still considered feasible for NGS, indicating that TBNA represents an alternative method to obtain sufficient tumor tissue in peripheral nodules as part of the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38881945
doi: 10.21037/tcr-23-2320
pii: tcr-13-05-2464
pmc: PMC11170508
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2464-2474

Informations de copyright

2024 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tcr-23-2320/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Florian Sticht (F)

Clinic and Polyclinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine II, Pneumology, Bad Reichenhall District Hospital, Bad Reichenhall, Germany.

Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner (MV)

Center for Pneumology, Donaustauf Hospital, Donaustauf, Germany.

Clemens Wiest (C)

Clinic and Polyclinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Christian Schulz (C)

Clinic and Polyclinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Christoph Fisser (C)

Clinic and Polyclinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Pneumology, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Andreas Mamilos (A)

Department of Pathology, University Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Department of Pathology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.

Classifications MeSH