Fracture resistance of CAD/CAM milled versus direct hand-made interim laminate veneers.

Aesthetic dentistry CAD/CAM systems Cosmetic dentistry Dental materials Dental prosthesis Dental prosthesis design Dental restorations Dental veneers Direct restorations Fracture resistance Indirect restorations Interim restorations Laminate veneers Partial restorations Provisional restorations Temporary restorations

Journal

The Saudi dental journal
ISSN: 1013-9052
Titre abrégé: Saudi Dent J
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 9313603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 13 11 2023
revised: 03 04 2024
accepted: 15 04 2024
medline: 17 6 2024
pubmed: 17 6 2024
entrez: 17 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Comparative studies of interim veneer restorations crafted using subtractive computer-aided manufacturing (s-CAM) milling technology and traditional direct hand-made approaches are needed. This comparative in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance of two types of provisional veneer restorations for maxillary central incisors: milled (s-CAM) and traditional direct hand-made bis-acryl veneers. Fifty maxillary right central incisor veneers (25 specimens per group) were fabricated and divided according to the fabrication method: (1) s-CAM milled (Structure CAD, VOCO Dental); and (2) hand-made (Protemp Plus, 3M). The restorations were cemented onto 3D-printed resin dies using temporary cement and subjected to 1000 cycles of thermal cycling between 5° and 55 °C. These restorations subsequently were subjected to compressive loading until fracture occurred. Images of the fractured samples were captured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way ANOVA test and the Mann-Whitney Significant differences (p < 0.001) in the fracture resistance were observed between the two groups. s-CAM milled interim veneers displayed higher fracture resistance values (439.60 ± 26 N) compared to the traditional method (149.15 ± 10 N). The manufacturing method significantly influences the fracture resistance of interim veneer restorations. s-CAM interim laminate veneer restorations for maxillary central incisors exhibit a fracture resistance superior to that of the traditional method using bis-acryl.Clinical relevanceClinicians should consider CAD/CAM milled veneers for scenarios demanding long-term interim restoration and the withstanding of high occlusal forces.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Comparative studies of interim veneer restorations crafted using subtractive computer-aided manufacturing (s-CAM) milling technology and traditional direct hand-made approaches are needed.
Purpose UNASSIGNED
This comparative in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance of two types of provisional veneer restorations for maxillary central incisors: milled (s-CAM) and traditional direct hand-made bis-acryl veneers.
Materials and methods UNASSIGNED
Fifty maxillary right central incisor veneers (25 specimens per group) were fabricated and divided according to the fabrication method: (1) s-CAM milled (Structure CAD, VOCO Dental); and (2) hand-made (Protemp Plus, 3M). The restorations were cemented onto 3D-printed resin dies using temporary cement and subjected to 1000 cycles of thermal cycling between 5° and 55 °C. These restorations subsequently were subjected to compressive loading until fracture occurred. Images of the fractured samples were captured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using the one-way ANOVA test and the Mann-Whitney
Results UNASSIGNED
Significant differences (p < 0.001) in the fracture resistance were observed between the two groups. s-CAM milled interim veneers displayed higher fracture resistance values (439.60 ± 26 N) compared to the traditional method (149.15 ± 10 N).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The manufacturing method significantly influences the fracture resistance of interim veneer restorations. s-CAM interim laminate veneer restorations for maxillary central incisors exhibit a fracture resistance superior to that of the traditional method using bis-acryl.Clinical relevanceClinicians should consider CAD/CAM milled veneers for scenarios demanding long-term interim restoration and the withstanding of high occlusal forces.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38883892
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.04.002
pii: S1013-9052(24)00124-X
pmc: PMC11178957
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

920-925

Informations de copyright

© 2024 THE AUTHORS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Salahaldeen Abuhammoud (S)

Department of Prosthodontics, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Banan Emtier (B)

University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Chin-Chuan Fu (CC)

Department of Restorative Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Silvia Rojas-Rueda (S)

Division of Biomaterials, Department of Clinical and Community Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
School of Dentistry, Pontifical Javerian University, Bogota, Colombia.

Carlos A Jurado (CA)

Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, University of Tennesse Health Science Center College of Dentistry, Memphis, TN, USA.

Kelvin I Afrashtehfar (KI)

Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Berne, BE, Switzerland.
Clinical Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman City, Emirate of Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Private Practice Limited to Prosthodontics, Dubai, DU, United Arab Emirates.
Private Practice Limited to Prosthodontics, Abu Dhabi City, AZ, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH