Internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy for obsessive-compulsive symptoms: A randomized controlled trial.

Subthreshold obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) are associated with increased distress, help seeking behaviours, and functional problems, and may predict progression into further mental health problems. This study investigated the effectiveness of a four-module internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy (iACT) for adults with OCS compared to internet-based progressive relaxation training (iPRT). Eighty-nine adults with OCS participated in a single-blinded randomised controlled trial of iACT or iPRT. Self-report assessments of OCS, psychological flexibility, and quality of life, among others, were measured at baseline, post-treatment, and at three-month follow-up. Both iACT and iPRT showed large pre-post improvements in OCS (b = 6.32, p < 0.001, d = 0.8) and medium improvements in psychological flexibility (b = -0.38, p = 0.011, d = 0.47) and quality of life (b = -5.26, p = 0.008, d = 0.58), with no significant differences in effects between groups. All improvements were maintained at follow-up. There were no differences in attrition or adherence between groups. iACT was rated more favourably by participants at post-treatment, and there were some differences in qualitative feedback across groups. These findings suggest both iPRT and iACT may be helpful in improving mental health in adults with OCS, but that iACT may be more acceptable.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Shelley Viskovich and Kenneth Pakenham receive royalties from UniQuest for commercial (not research) licensing arrangements entered into by third parties who want to deliver YOLO. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.