Comprehensive clinical and histological evaluation of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft with polypropylene membrane versus leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction.


Journal

Minerva dental and oral science
ISSN: 2724-6337
Titre abrégé: Minerva Dent Oral Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101778009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 18 6 2024
pubmed: 18 6 2024
entrez: 18 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Osseointegrated implant placement in the ideal prosthetic position necessitates a sufficient residual alveolar ridge. Tooth extraction and the subsequent healing process often lead to bony deformities, characterized by a reduction in alveolar ridge height and width, resulting in unfavorable ridge architecture for dental implant placement. Several materials, including allografts, alloplastics, xenografts, and autogenous bone, are commonly used to address these concerns. In this context, leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) emerges as a promising solution. This case report aims to compare the clinical and histological efficacy of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft covered with polypropylene membrane (BHAG-PM) and leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in preserving dental alveoli following tooth extraction. Extraction, graft placement in the alveoli, and the anterior border between extracted elements were performed for both treatment groups. Up to 24 months of follow-up revealed satisfactory and comparable clinical and histological outcomes. These results suggest that both BHAG-PM and L-PRF effectively promote alveolar preservation, paving the way for ideal implant placement. In general, bone-substitute materials are effective in reducing alveolar changes after tooth extraction. Xenograft materials should be considered as among the best of the available grafting materials for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction. Both techniques effectively preserve the alveolar bone and facilitate the placement of osseointegrated implants in ideal positions, paving the way for successful oral rehabilitation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Osseointegrated implant placement in the ideal prosthetic position necessitates a sufficient residual alveolar ridge. Tooth extraction and the subsequent healing process often lead to bony deformities, characterized by a reduction in alveolar ridge height and width, resulting in unfavorable ridge architecture for dental implant placement. Several materials, including allografts, alloplastics, xenografts, and autogenous bone, are commonly used to address these concerns. In this context, leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) emerges as a promising solution.
METHODS METHODS
This case report aims to compare the clinical and histological efficacy of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft covered with polypropylene membrane (BHAG-PM) and leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in preserving dental alveoli following tooth extraction. Extraction, graft placement in the alveoli, and the anterior border between extracted elements were performed for both treatment groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Up to 24 months of follow-up revealed satisfactory and comparable clinical and histological outcomes. These results suggest that both BHAG-PM and L-PRF effectively promote alveolar preservation, paving the way for ideal implant placement.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In general, bone-substitute materials are effective in reducing alveolar changes after tooth extraction. Xenograft materials should be considered as among the best of the available grafting materials for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction. Both techniques effectively preserve the alveolar bone and facilitate the placement of osseointegrated implants in ideal positions, paving the way for successful oral rehabilitation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38888733
pii: S2724-6329.24.05016-2
doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05016-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Karine C Lima (KC)

Brazilian Dental Association, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.
Department of Dental Medicine, Federal Fluminense University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Maria E Bizzoca (ME)

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy - mariaeleonora.bizzoca@unifg.it.

Michele Covelli (M)

Libera Università Mediterranea "G. Degennaro", Casamassima, Bari, Italy.

Anderson C DE Oliveira (AC)

Brazilian Dental Association, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.

Fabiano C Zanardo (FC)

Brazilian Dental Association, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.
Faculty of Dentistry (FOUSP), University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Ricardo R Vecchiatti (RR)

Brazilian Dental Association, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.

Jocelino L Soares (JL)

Brazilian Dental Association, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.

Nunzio Cirulli (N)

Private practitioner, Bari, Italy.

Stefania Cantore (S)

Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy.

Fábio F Silva (FF)

Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy.
Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
ORALRES Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (FIDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Classifications MeSH