Simulation-Based Training Program for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement: Randomized Comparative Study of in-Person Training With Synchronous Feedback Versus Distance Training With Asynchronous Feedback.
Journal
Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
ISSN: 1559-713X
Titre abrégé: Simul Healthc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264408
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jun 2024
17 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline:
18
6
2024
pubmed:
18
6
2024
entrez:
18
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Simulation training that includes deliberate practice is effective for procedural skill training. Delivering feedback remotely and asynchronously has been examined for more cost-efficient training. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare 2 feedback techniques for simulation training: synchronous direct feedback versus asynchronous distance feedback (ASYNC). Forty anesthesia and internal medicine residents were recruited after study approval by the institutional ethics committee. Residents reviewed instructional material on an online platform and performed a pretraining assessment (PRE) for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement. Each resident was then randomly assigned to 1 of 2 training types, practice with synchronous direct feedback (SYNC) or practice with ASYNC. Training consisted of four, 1-hour practice sessions; each was conducted once per week. Both groups underwent posttraining evaluation (POST). The PRE and POST assessments were videotaped and evaluated by 2 independent, blinded reviewers using a global rating scale. Thirty-five residents completed the training program and both evaluations. Both groups had significantly improved global rating scale scores after 4 sessions. The SYNC group improved from 28 to 45 points (P < 0.01); the ASYNC group improved from 26.5 to 46 points (P < 0.01). We found no significant between-group differences for the PRE (P = 0.42) or POST assessments (P = 0.13). This simulation-based training program significantly improved residents' peripherally inserted central venous catheter placement skills using either modality. With these results, we are unable to demonstrate the superiority of synchronous feedback over ASYNC. Asynchronous feedback training modality represents a new, innovative approach for health care procedural skills training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38888993
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000805
pii: 01266021-990000000-00126
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Huang GC, McSparron JI, Balk EM, et al. Procedural instruction in invasive bedside procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effective teaching approaches. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25(4):281–294.
Corvetto MA, Pedemonte JC, Varas D, Fuentes C, Altermatt FR. Simulation-based training program with deliberate practice for ultrasound-guided jugular central venous catheter placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2017;61(9):1184–1191.
Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15(11):988–994.
Cook DA, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Hatala R. Mastery learning for health professionals using technology-enhanced simulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med 2013;88(8):1178–1186.
Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach 2013;35(1):e867–e898.
Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005;27:10–28.
Burns CL. Using debriefing and feedback in simulation to improve participant performance: an educator's perspective. Int J Med Educ 2015;6:118–120.
Corvetto MA, Kattan E, Varas J, Caro I, Altermatt FR. Designing sustainable solutions to implement a distance-based simulation basic life support training program during COVID-19 pandemic in low-income countries. Simul Healthc 2022;17(5):351–352.
Vera M, Kattan E, Cerda T, et al. Implementation of distance-based simulation training programs for healthcare professionals: breaking barriers during COVID-19 pandemic. Simul Healthc 2021;16(6):401–406.
Varela E, Castelli I, Szwarcfiter V, et al. Latin American residents' surgical education after the pandemic: what strategies have emerged for adapting to this new era? Arq Bras Cir Dig 2022;35:e1708.
Hernández PR, López JL, Martín JG, Eguía BR. Care and cost-utility indicators for high-flow PICC catheters: a study. Br J Nurs 2011;20(4):S22–S27.
Belmar F, Gaete MI, Durán V, et al. Taking advantage of asynchronous digital feedback: development of an at-home basic suture skills training program for undergraduate medical students that facilitates skills retention. Global Surg Educ 2023;2:32.
C1DO1. Available at: https://www.c1do1.ai/platform. Accessed March 16, 2023.
Gaete MI, Belmar F, Cortés M, et al. Remote and asynchronous training network: from a SAGES grant to an eight-country remote laparoscopic simulation training program. Surg Endosc 2023;37(2):1458–1465.
Ma IW, Zalunardo N, Pachev G, et al. Comparing the use of global rating scale with checklists for the assessment of central venous catheterization skills using simulation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012;17(4):457–470.
Villagrán I, Rammsy F, Del Valle J, et al. Remote, asynchronous training and feedback enables development of neurodynamic skills in physiotherapy students. BMC Med Educ 2023;23:267.
Buléon C, Caton J, Park YS, et al. The state of distance healthcare simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an international survey. Adv Simul 2022;7:10.
Sharara-Chami R, Sabouneh R, Zeineddine R, Banat R, Fayad J, Lakissian Z. In situ simulation: an essential tool for safe preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic. Simul Healthc 2020;15(5):303–309.
Malhotra A, Kumar A. Breaking the COVID-19 barriers to health professional team training with online simulation. Simul Healthc 2021;16(1):80–81.
Díaz-Guio DA, Ríos-Barrientos E, Santillán-Roldan PA, et al. Online-synchronized clinical simulation: an efficient teaching-learning option for the COVID-19 pandemic time and beyond. Adv Simul (Lond) 2021;6(1):30.
Packard K, Iverson L, Ryan-Haddad A, Teply R, Wize A, Qi Y. A synchronous interprofessional patient safety simulation integrating distance health professions students. J Nurs Educ 2019;58(10):577–582.
Chandran VP, Balakrishnan A, Rashid M, et al. Mobile applications in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One 2022;17(3):e0265927.
Quezada JL, Achurra P, Jarry C, et al. Minimally invasive tele-mentoring opportunity-the mito project. Surg Endosc 2020;34(6):2585–2592.
Zaghal A, Marley C, Rahhal S, et al. Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: a quantitative prospective randomized trial. BMC Med Educ 2022;22:290.