Comparison of limb reconstruction with vascularized fibula flap versus induced membrane technique in 54 pediatric cases over 16 years.

Bone Children Fibula flap Induced membrane Reconstruction

Journal

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
ISSN: 1878-0539
Titre abrégé: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101264239

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 15 01 2024
revised: 01 05 2024
accepted: 24 05 2024
medline: 19 6 2024
pubmed: 19 6 2024
entrez: 18 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Children's bone loss of limbs represents a significant challenge for surgeons, especially given that children are growing individuals. In the pediatric population, we compared bone reconstruction using vascularized fibula flaps with the induced membrane technique. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the delay and quality of consolidation. Data from patients who underwent limb reconstruction using either the fibula flap or the induced membrane were retrospectively collected from files across two centers. Perioperative and long-term complications were documented, along with functional and aesthetic outcome. Between 2004 and 2020, 31 children underwent limb reconstruction using a fibula flap, and 13 patients were treated using the induced membrane technique. The etiologies included 76% tumors, 20% congenital pseudarthroses, and 3.7% infections. The median size of the bone resection was 12.5 cm (range: 1.8 to 31 cm). The median time to consolidation after free fibula flap transfer was 10 months (range: 2 to 55 months) versus 7.5 months (range: 1 to 64 months) for the Masquelet technique (p = 0.54). Limb length inequality occurred in 52% of fibula cases and 39% of the induced membrane cases (p = 0.55). Both of free fibula flap and the induced membrane technique are effective options for bone reconstructing long bones in children. These techniques yield good functional outcomes and have comparable consolidation times.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Children's bone loss of limbs represents a significant challenge for surgeons, especially given that children are growing individuals. In the pediatric population, we compared bone reconstruction using vascularized fibula flaps with the induced membrane technique. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the delay and quality of consolidation.
METHODS METHODS
Data from patients who underwent limb reconstruction using either the fibula flap or the induced membrane were retrospectively collected from files across two centers. Perioperative and long-term complications were documented, along with functional and aesthetic outcome.
RESULTS RESULTS
Between 2004 and 2020, 31 children underwent limb reconstruction using a fibula flap, and 13 patients were treated using the induced membrane technique. The etiologies included 76% tumors, 20% congenital pseudarthroses, and 3.7% infections. The median size of the bone resection was 12.5 cm (range: 1.8 to 31 cm). The median time to consolidation after free fibula flap transfer was 10 months (range: 2 to 55 months) versus 7.5 months (range: 1 to 64 months) for the Masquelet technique (p = 0.54). Limb length inequality occurred in 52% of fibula cases and 39% of the induced membrane cases (p = 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Both of free fibula flap and the induced membrane technique are effective options for bone reconstructing long bones in children. These techniques yield good functional outcomes and have comparable consolidation times.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38889589
pii: S1748-6815(24)00315-2
doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.033
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

75-86

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Vandewalle Louise (V)

Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Pediatric Orthopedics Department, France. Electronic address: louise.vandewalle@chu-lille.fr.

Mézel Aurélie (M)

Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Pediatric Orthopedics Department, France.

Canavese Federico (C)

Jeanne de Flandre Hospital, CHU Lille, Pediatric Orthopedics Department, France.

Hamel Antoine (H)

Hôpital Mère Enfant, CHU Nantes, Pediatric Orthopedics Department, France.

Béhal Hélène (B)

Department of Biostatistics, Univ. Lille, EA 2694-Santé Publique: Épidémiologie et Qualité des Soins, CHU Lille, Lille, France.

Duteille Franck (D)

Hôtel Dieu, CHU Nantes, Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, France.

Classifications MeSH