A Comprehensive Excursus of the Roles of Echocardiography in Heart Transplantation Follow-Up.

Doppler tissue imaging coronary flow reserve echocardiography heart transplantation strain rate imaging stress imaging

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 May 2024
Historique:
received: 24 04 2024
revised: 23 05 2024
accepted: 27 05 2024
medline: 19 6 2024
pubmed: 19 6 2024
entrez: 19 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Current guidelines for the care of heart transplantation recipients recommend routine endomyocardial biopsy and invasive coronary angiography as the cornerstones in the surveillance for acute rejection (AR) and coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Non-invasive tools, including coronary computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, have been introduced into guidelines without roles of their own as gold standards. These techniques also carry the risk of contrast-related kidney injury. There is a need to explore non-invasive approaches providing valuable information while minimizing risks and allowing their application independently of patient comorbidities. Echocardiographic examination can be performed at bedside, serially repeated, and does not carry the burden of contrast-related kidney injury and procedure-related risk. It provides comprehensive assessment of cardiac morphology and function. Advanced echocardiography techniques, including Doppler tissue imaging and strain imaging, may be sensitive tools for the detection of minor myocardial dysfunction, thus providing insight into early detection of AR and CAV. Stress echocardiography may offer a valuable tool in the detection of CAV, while the assessment of coronary flow reserve can unravel coronary microvascular impairment and add prognostic value to conventional stress echocardiography. The review highlights the role of Doppler echocardiography in heart transplantation follow-up, weighting advantages and limitations of the different techniques.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38892916
pii: jcm13113205
doi: 10.3390/jcm13113205
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Daniela Bacich (D)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Chiara Tessari (C)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Giulia Ciccarelli (G)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Giovanni Lucertini (G)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Alessia Cerutti (A)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Nicola Pradegan (N)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Giuseppe Toscano (G)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Giovanni Di Salvo (G)

Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Antonio Gambino (A)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Gino Gerosa (G)

Cardiac Surgery Unit, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH