[

Atypical response Dissociated response Immunotherapy PET/CT Pseudoprogression

Journal

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 08 03 2024
accepted: 05 06 2024
medline: 19 6 2024
pubmed: 19 6 2024
entrez: 19 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine the long-term prognosis of immune-related response profiles (pseudoprogression and dissociated response), not covered by conventional PERCIST criteria, in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs). 109 patients were prospectively included and underwent [ Median follow-up was 21 months. At PET [ HDH F20230309081206. Registered 20 April 2023. Retrospectively registered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38896129
doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06794-8
pii: 10.1007/s00259-024-06794-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Zhang Y, Luo G, Etxeberria J, Hao Y. Global patterns and trends in lung cancer incidence: A population-based study. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:933–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.01.1626
Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1627–39.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643
Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;389:255–65.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X
Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim D-W, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1540–50.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7
Horn L, Spigel DR, Vokes EE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Two-year outcomes from two randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:3924–33.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062
Ramos-Esquivel A, van der Laat A, Rojas-Vigott R, Juárez M, Corrales-Rodríguez L. Anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. ESMO Open. 2017;2: e000236.
doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2017-000236
Aide N, Hicks RJ, Le Tourneau C, et al. FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:238–50.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4171-4
Sheikhbahaei S, Verde F, Hales RK, et al. Imaging in therapy response assessment and surveillance of lung cancer: Evidenced-based review with focus on the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020;21:485–97.
doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.06.020
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S-S150.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
Sachpekidis C, Anwar H, Winkler J, et al. The role of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of response to ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1289–96.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3972-9
Hughes DJ, Subesinghe M, Taylor B, et al. 18F FDG PET/CT and novel molecular imaging for directing immunotherapy in cancer. Radiology. 2022;304:246–64.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.212481
Goldfarb L, Duchemann B, Chouahnia K, et al. Monitoring anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET: introduction of iPERCIST. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9:8.
doi: 10.1186/s13550-019-0473-1
Ito K, Teng R, Schöder H, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for monitoring of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:335–41.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.213652
Anwar H, Sachpekidis C, Winkler J, et al. Absolute number of new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT is more predictive of clinical response than SUV changes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:376–83.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3870-6
Lopci E, Hicks RJ, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, et al. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:2323–41.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05780-2
Lopci E, Aide N, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, et al. Perspectives on joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards for [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Imaging. 2022;22:73.
doi: 10.1186/s40644-022-00512-z
Borcoman E, Kanjanapan Y, Champiat S, et al. Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:385–96.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz003
Humbert O, Chardin D. Dissociated response in metastatic cancer: An atypical pattern brought into the spotlight with immunotherapy. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1792.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.566297
Guan Y, Feng D, Yin B, Li K, Wang J. Immune-related dissociated response as a specific atypical response pattern in solid tumors with immune checkpoint blockade. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221096876.
doi: 10.1177/17588359221096877
Cho SY, Lipson EJ, Im H-J, et al. Prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy using early-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with advanced melanoma. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:1421–8.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188839
Kaira K, Higuchi T, Naruse I, et al. Metabolic activity by 18F–FDG-PET/CT is predictive of early response after nivolumab in previously treated NSCLC. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:56–66.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3806-1
Rocha P, Hardy-Werbin M, Naranjo D, et al. CD103+CD8+ lymphocytes characterize the immune infiltration in a case with pseudoprogression in squamous NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:e193–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.008
Hodi FS, Hwu W-J, Kefford R, et al. Evaluation of immune-related response criteria and RECIST v1.1 in patients with advanced melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1510–7.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.0391
Humbert O, Cadour N, Paquet M, et al. 18FDG PET/CT in the early assessment of non-small cell lung cancer response to immunotherapy: frequency and clinical significance of atypical evolutive patterns. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:1158–67.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04573-4
Rossi G, Bauckneht M, Genova C, et al. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET-based and CT-based criteria in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:990–8.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.233056
Queirolo P, Spagnolo F. Atypical responses in patients with advanced melanoma, lung cancer, renal-cell carcinoma and other solid tumors treated with anti-PD-1 drugs: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;59:71–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.07.002
Park HJ, Kim KW, Pyo J, et al. Incidence of pseudoprogression during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2020;297:87–96.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200443
Chen M-Y, Zeng Y-C. Pseudoprogression in lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;169:103531.
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103531
Huyge V, Garcia C, Alexiou J, et al. Heterogeneity of metabolic response to systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010;22:818–27.
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.05.021
Tazdait M, Mezquita L, Lahmar J, et al. Patterns of responses in metastatic NSCLC during PD-1 or PDL-1 inhibitor therapy: Comparison of RECIST 1.1, irRECIST and iRECIST criteria. Eur J Cancer. 2018;88:38–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.017
Tozuka T, Kitazono S, Sakamoto H, et al. Dissociated responses at initial computed tomography evaluation is a good prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 inhibitors. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:207.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6704-z
Bernard-Tessier A, Baldini C, Castanon E, et al. Patterns of progression in patients treated for immuno-oncology antibodies combination. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70:221–32.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02647-z
Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals Oncol. 2018;29:192–237.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy275
Martin-Romano P, Castanon E, Ammari S, et al. Evidence of pseudoprogression in patients treated with PD1/PDL1 antibodies across tumor types. Cancer Med. 2020;9:2643–52.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.2797
Fujimoto D, Yoshioka H, Kataoka Y, et al. Pseudoprogression in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received nivolumab monotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2019;14:468–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.10.167
Sato Y, Morimoto T, Hara S, et al. Dissociated response and clinical benefit in patients treated with nivolumab monotherapy. Invest New Drugs. 2021;39:1170–8.
doi: 10.1007/s10637-021-01077-7
Anderson TM, Chang BH, Huang AC, et al. FDG PET/CT Imaging 1 week after a single dose of pembrolizumab predicts treatment response in patients with advanced melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2024;OF1–10.
Gonugunta AS, von Itzstein MS, Gerber DE. Pseudoprogression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with combination chemoimmunotherapy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2022;16:289.
doi: 10.1186/s13256-022-03485-6
Humbert O, Bauckneht M, Gal J, et al. Prognostic value of immunotherapy-induced organ inflammation assessed on 18FDG PET in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:3878–91.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05788-8

Auteurs

Mathilde Masse (M)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nuclear Medicine Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France. mathilde-m@outlook.fr.
Université Côte D'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, iBV, Nice, France. mathilde-m@outlook.fr.

David Chardin (D)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nuclear Medicine Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
Université Côte D'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, iBV, Nice, France.

Pierre Tricarico (P)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nuclear Medicine Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.

Victoria Ferrari (V)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Oncology Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.

Nicolas Martin (N)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Oncology Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.

Josiane Otto (J)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Oncology Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.

Jacques Darcourt (J)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nuclear Medicine Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
TIRO-UMR E 4320, UCA/CEA, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.

Victor Comte (V)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nuclear Medicine Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
Université Côte D'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, iBV, Nice, France.

Olivier Humbert (O)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nuclear Medicine Department, 33 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.
Université Côte D'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, iBV, Nice, France.

Classifications MeSH