Machine learning of dissection photographs and surface scanning for quantitative 3D neuropathology.
dissection photography
human
machine learning
neuroscience
surface scanning
volumetry
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jun 2024
19 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline:
19
6
2024
pubmed:
19
6
2024
entrez:
19
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We present open-source tools for three-dimensional (3D) analysis of photographs of dissected slices of human brains, which are routinely acquired in brain banks but seldom used for quantitative analysis. Our tools can: (1) 3D reconstruct a volume from the photographs and, optionally, a surface scan; and (2) produce a high-resolution 3D segmentation into 11 brain regions per hemisphere (22 in total), independently of the slice thickness. Our tools can be used as a substitute for ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which requires access to an MRI scanner, ex vivo scanning expertise, and considerable financial resources. We tested our tools on synthetic and real data from two NIH Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers. The results show that our methodology yields accurate 3D reconstructions, segmentations, and volumetric measurements that are highly correlated to those from MRI. Our method also detects expected differences between Every year, thousands of human brains are donated to science. These brains are used to study normal aging, as well as neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s. Donated brains usually go to ‘brain banks’, institutions where the brains are dissected to extract tissues relevant to different diseases. During this process, it is routine to take photographs of brain slices for archiving purposes. Often, studies of dead brains rely on qualitative observations, such as ‘the hippocampus displays some atrophy’, rather than concrete ‘numerical’ measurements. This is because the gold standard to take three-dimensional measurements of the brain is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is an expensive technique that requires high expertise – especially with dead brains. The lack of quantitative data means it is not always straightforward to study certain conditions. To bridge this gap, Gazula et al. have developed an openly available software that can build three-dimensional reconstructions of dead brains based on photographs of brain slices. The software can also use machine learning methods to automatically extract different brain regions from the three-dimensional reconstructions and measure their size. These data can be used to take precise quantitative measurements that can be used to better describe how different conditions lead to changes in the brain, such as atrophy (reduced volume of one or more brain regions). The researchers assessed the accuracy of the method in two ways. First, they digitally sliced MRI-scanned brains and used the software to compute the sizes of different structures based on these synthetic data, comparing the results to the known sizes. Second, they used brains for which both MRI data and dissection photographs existed and compared the measurements taken by the software to the measurements obtained with MRI images. Gazula et al. show that, as long as the photographs satisfy some basic conditions, they can provide good estimates of the sizes of many brain structures. The tools developed by Gazula et al. are publicly available as part of FreeSurfer, a widespread neuroimaging software that can be used by any researcher working at a brain bank. This will allow brain banks to obtain accurate measurements of dead brains, allowing them to cheaply perform quantitative studies of brain structures, which could lead to new findings relating to neurodegenerative diseases.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Every year, thousands of human brains are donated to science. These brains are used to study normal aging, as well as neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s. Donated brains usually go to ‘brain banks’, institutions where the brains are dissected to extract tissues relevant to different diseases. During this process, it is routine to take photographs of brain slices for archiving purposes. Often, studies of dead brains rely on qualitative observations, such as ‘the hippocampus displays some atrophy’, rather than concrete ‘numerical’ measurements. This is because the gold standard to take three-dimensional measurements of the brain is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is an expensive technique that requires high expertise – especially with dead brains. The lack of quantitative data means it is not always straightforward to study certain conditions. To bridge this gap, Gazula et al. have developed an openly available software that can build three-dimensional reconstructions of dead brains based on photographs of brain slices. The software can also use machine learning methods to automatically extract different brain regions from the three-dimensional reconstructions and measure their size. These data can be used to take precise quantitative measurements that can be used to better describe how different conditions lead to changes in the brain, such as atrophy (reduced volume of one or more brain regions). The researchers assessed the accuracy of the method in two ways. First, they digitally sliced MRI-scanned brains and used the software to compute the sizes of different structures based on these synthetic data, comparing the results to the known sizes. Second, they used brains for which both MRI data and dissection photographs existed and compared the measurements taken by the software to the measurements obtained with MRI images. Gazula et al. show that, as long as the photographs satisfy some basic conditions, they can provide good estimates of the sizes of many brain structures. The tools developed by Gazula et al. are publicly available as part of FreeSurfer, a widespread neuroimaging software that can be used by any researcher working at a brain bank. This will allow brain banks to obtain accurate measurements of dead brains, allowing them to cheaply perform quantitative studies of brain structures, which could lead to new findings relating to neurodegenerative diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38896568
doi: 10.7554/eLife.91398
pii: 91398
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01AG070988
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30AG062421
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : RF1MH123195
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01EB031114
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UM1MH130981
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P30AG066509 (UW ADRC)
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U19AG066567
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U19AG060909
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : K08AG065426
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS112161
Pays : United States
Organisme : European Union
ID : ERC Starting Grant 677697
Organisme : Alzheimer's Research UK
ID : ARUK-IRG2019A-003
Organisme : Politècnica de Catalunya
ID : Grant Ref 2021UPC-MS-67573
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : U01MH117023
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1R01EB023281
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01EB006758
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21EB018907
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01EB019956
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : P41EB030006
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1R56AG064027
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1R01AG064027
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 5R01AG008122
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01AG016495
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1R01AG070988
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UM1MH130981
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH123195
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH121885
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1RF1MH123195
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS0525851
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21NS072652
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS070963
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS083534
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 5U01NS086625
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 5U24NS10059103
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R01NS105820
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1S10RR023401
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1S10RR019307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 1S10RR023043
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 5U01MH093765
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023, Gazula et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
HG, HT, BB, YB, JW, RH, LD, AC, EM, CL, MK, MM, ER, EB, MM, TC, DO, MF, SY, KV, AD, CM, CK, JI No competing interests declared, BF BF has a financial interest in CorticoMetrics, a company developing brain MRI measurementtechnology; his interests are reviewed and managed by Massachusetts General Hospital, BH Reviewing editor, eLife
Références
Med Image Anal. 1998 Mar;2(1):1-36
pubmed: 10638851
Neurobiol Aging. 2005 Oct;26(9):1261-70; discussion 1275-8
pubmed: 16005549
Med Image Anal. 2023 May;86:102789
pubmed: 36857946
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Aug;30(4):449-459
pubmed: 28577131
Med Image Anal. 2018 May;46:73-105
pubmed: 29502034
Sci Data. 2019 Jan 15;6(1):1
pubmed: 30647409
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 1;62(4):2222-31
pubmed: 22366334
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 28;120(9):e2216399120
pubmed: 36802420
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1064-80
pubmed: 18037310
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jul;14(7):721-30
pubmed: 15054051
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573
Brain. 2009 Aug;132(Pt 8):2048-57
pubmed: 19460794
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Jul;15(7):995-1001
pubmed: 15537673
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Apr 21;15:56-61
pubmed: 28491492
Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:450341
pubmed: 25945121
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
pubmed: 11701515
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;76 Suppl 5:v8-14
pubmed: 16291923
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5501-5518
pubmed: 28737295
J Neurol Sci. 2009 Aug 15;283(1-2):119-26
pubmed: 19324376
Front Neurol. 2016 Nov 29;7:208
pubmed: 27965620
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Neuroimage. 2016 Dec;143:235-249
pubmed: 27612647
Sci Adv. 2023 Feb 3;9(5):eadd3607
pubmed: 36724222
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003 Aug;22(8):986-1004
pubmed: 12906253
Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Mar;30(3):432-40
pubmed: 17869384
Neuron. 2002 Jan 31;33(3):341-55
pubmed: 11832223
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jul;32(7):1153-90
pubmed: 23739795
Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 18;15:693242
pubmed: 34483821