Hyperacusis questionnaire and event-related potential correlation in migraine patients.
Auditory hypersensitivity
Event-related potentials
Migraine
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 06 2024
19 06 2024
Historique:
received:
18
02
2024
accepted:
16
06
2024
medline:
20
6
2024
pubmed:
20
6
2024
entrez:
19
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aims to investigate auditory hypersensitivity and cortical function in migraine patients using the Hyperacusis Questionnaire and the Event-Related Potential (ERP) technique. The study analyzes alterations in the latency and amplitude of the event-related potentials MMN and P300 components. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the physiological relationship between migraine and auditory hypersensitivity. Seventeen migraine patients were admitted to the outpatient clinic of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Peking University People's Hospital from June 2023 to September 2023. Nineteen matched healthy subjects were also selected. All participants underwent the pure tone audiometry and the auditory brainstem response test to determine hearing thresholds, the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, and an ERP examination. The Oddball classical paradigm was used as the stimulation task, and electroencephalography signals were recorded synchronously. The scores of the Hyperacusis Questionnaire, latency and amplitude of MMN and P300 component were compared between the migraine group and the control group, and their correlation was analyzed. The latency of MMN at the Fz and Cz sites in migraine patients was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and the amplitudes were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The variances in latency and amplitude of P300 at Cz and Pz sites in migraine patients were not statistically significant when compared with the control group. (P > 0.05). The Hyperacusis Questionnaire was negatively correlated with MMN latency, with a correlation coefficient of - 0.374 (P = 0.025), and positively correlated with MMN amplitude, with a correlation coefficient of 0.378 (P = 0.023). There was no significant similarity between the Hyperacusis Questionnaire and P300 latency and amplitude (P > 0.05). Overall, auditory hypersensitivity was enhanced in individuals with migraines compared to healthy individuals, leading to faster information processing, while there may be less impairment in cognitive function.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38898084
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65014-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-65014-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14117Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dodick, D. W. Migraine. The Lancet 391(10127), 1315–1330 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30478-1
Reuter, U. GBD 2016: Still no improvement in the burden of migraine. Lancet Neurol. 17(11), 929–930 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30360-0
Bhola, R. et al. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) for the acute treatment of migraine: Evaluation of outcome data for the UK post market pilot program. J. Headache Pain 16, 535 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0535-3
Kayan, A. & Hood, J. D. Neuro-otological manifestations of migraine. Brain J. Neurol. 107(Pt 4), 1123–1142 (1984).
doi: 10.1093/brain/107.4.1123
Suhnan, A. P., Finch, P. M. & Drummond, P. D. Hyperacusis in chronic pain: Neural interactions between the auditory and nociceptive systems. Int. J. Audiol. 56(11), 801–809 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346303
Näätänen R, PICTON T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology, 1987, 24(4): 375–425.
NääTäNEN R, TERVANIEMI M, SUSSMAN E, et al. "Primitive intelligence" in the auditory cortex [J]. Trends Neurosci, 2001, 24(5): 283–8.
Näätänen, R. et al. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118(12), 2544–2590 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026
Ponton, C. W. et al. Maturation of the mismatch negativity: Effects of profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol. Neurootol. 5(3–4), 167–185 (2000).
doi: 10.1159/000013878
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16(9), 606–613 (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
Spitzer, R. L. et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch. Intern. Med. 166(10), 1092–1097 (2006).
doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
Bissonnette, J. N. et al. MMN-indexed auditory change detection in major depressive disorder. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 51(6), 365–372 (2020).
doi: 10.1177/1550059420914200
Khalfa, S. et al. Psychometric normalization of a hyperacusis questionnaire. ORL 64(6), 436–442 (2002).
doi: 10.1159/000067570
Noseda, R. & Burstein, R. Migraine pathophysiology: anatomy of the trigeminovascular pathway and associated neurological symptoms, cortical spreading depression, sensitization, and modulation of pain. Pain 154(Suppl 1), S44-53 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.021
Victor, T. et al. Association between migraine, anxiety and depression. Cephalalgia 30(5), 567–575 (2010).
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01944.x
Kelman, L. & Tanis, D. The relationship between migraine pain and other associated symptoms. Cephalalgia 26(5), 548–553 (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01075.x
Abouzari, M. et al. Efficacy of multi-modal migraine prophylaxis therapy on hyperacusis patients. Anna. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 129(5), 421–427 (2020).
doi: 10.1177/0003489419892997
Cederroth, C. R. et al. Association between hyperacusis and tinnitus. J. Clin. Med. 9(8), 2412 (2020).
doi: 10.3390/jcm9082412
van Deursen, J. A. et al. Response speed, contingent negative variation and P300 in Alzheimer’s disease and MCI. Brain Cognit. 69(3), 592–599 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.007
Howe, A. S., Bani-Fatemi, A. & de Luca, V. The clinical utility of the auditory P300 latency subcomponent event-related potential in preclinical diagnosis of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Cognit. 86, 64–74 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.015
Montoya-Pedrón, A., Ocaña-Montoya, C. M. & Bolaño-Díaz, G. A. P300 cognitive event-related potentials in the diagnosis and classification of possible Alzheimer-type neurocognitive disorders. Revista de Neurologia 71(1), 11–85 (2020).
doi: 10.33588/rn.7101.2019341
Coppola, G. et al. Clinical neurophysiology of migraine with aura. J. Headache Pain 20(1), 42 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-0997-9
Mickleborough, M. J. et al. Cognitive processing of visual images in migraine populations in between headache attacks. Brain Res. 1582, 167–175 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.07.031
Mickleborough, M. J. et al. Attentional network differences between migraineurs and non-migraine controls: fMRI evidence. Brain Topogr. 29(3), 419–428 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s10548-015-0459-x
Mickleborough, M. J. et al. Interictal neurocognitive processing of visual stimuli in migraine: Evidence from event-related potentials. PloS One 8(11), e80920 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080920
Mickleborough, M. J. et al. Reflexive attentional orienting in migraineurs: The behavioral implications of hyperexcitable visual cortex. Cephalalgia 31(16), 1642–1651 (2011).
doi: 10.1177/0333102411425864
Coppola, G., Pierelli, F. & Schoenen, J. Habituation and migraine. Neurobiol. Learn. Memory 92(2), 249–259 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.07.006
Siniatchkin, M., Kropp, P. & Gerber, W. D. What kind of habituation is impaired in migraine patients?. Cephalalgia 23(7), 511–518 (2003).
doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00434.x