Glucose evaluation and management in the ICU (GEM-ICU): Protocol for a bi-centre cohort study.

glucose management hypoglycaemia intensive care unit

Journal

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1399-6576
Titre abrégé: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised: 14 05 2024
received: 08 05 2024
accepted: 23 05 2024
medline: 20 6 2024
pubmed: 20 6 2024
entrez: 20 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Hyperglycaemia is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Glycaemic monitoring and effective glycaemic control with insulin are crucial in the ICU to improve patient outcomes. However, glycaemic control and insulin use vary between ICU patients and hypo- and hyperglycaemia occurs. Therefore, we aim to provide contemporary data on glycaemic control and management, and associated outcomes, in adult ICU patients. We hypothesise that the occurrence of hypoglycaemia in acutely admitted ICU patients is lower than that of hyperglycaemia. We will conduct a bi-centre cohort study of 300 acutely admitted adult ICU patients. Routine data will be collected retrospectively at baseline (ICU admission) and daily during ICU stay up to a maximum of 30 days. The primary outcome will be the number of patients with hypoglycaemia during their ICU stay. Secondary outcomes will be occurrence of severe hypoglycaemia, occurrence of hyperglycaemia, time below blood glucose target range, time above target range, all-cause mortality at Day 30, number of days alive without life support at Day 30 and number of days alive and out of hospital at Day 30. Process outcomes include the number of in-ICU days, glucose measurements (number of measurements and method) and use of insulin (including route of administration and dosage). All statistical analyses will be descriptive. This cohort study will provide a contemporary overview of glucose evaluation and management practices in adult ICU patients and, thus, highlight potential areas for improvement through future clinical trials in this area.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38898601
doi: 10.1111/aas.14468
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Novo Nordisk Foundation
Organisme : Sygeforsikringen Denmark
Organisme : Becketts Foundation

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Références

Finney SJ, Zekveld C, Elia A, Evans TW. Glucose control and mortality in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2003;290(15):2041‐2047.
van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(5):449‐461.
NICE‐SUGAR Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1283‐1297.
Desgrouas M, Demiselle J, Stiel L, et al. Insulin therapy and blood glucose management in critically ill patients: a 1‐day cross‐sectional observational study in 69 French intensive care units. Ann Intensive Care. 2023;13(1):53.
Jacobi J, Bircher N, Krinsley J, et al. Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(12):3251‐3276.
Chase JG, Pretty CG, Pfeifer L, et al. Organ failure and tight glycemic control in the SPRINT study. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R154.
Lanspa MJ, Dickerson J, Morris AH, Orme JF, Holmen J, Hirshberg EL. Coefficient of glucose variation is independently associated with mortality in critically ill patients receiving intravenous insulin. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R86.
Alhatemi G, Aldiwani H, Alhatemi R, Hussein M, Mahdai S, Seyoum B. Glycemic control in the critically ill: less is more. Cleve Clin J Med. 2022;89(4):191‐199.
See KC. Glycemic targets in critically ill adults: a mini‐review. World J Diabetes. 2021;12(10):1719‐1730.
Penning S, Pretty C, Preiser JC, Shaw GM, Desaive T, Chase JG. Glucose control positively influences patient outcome: a retrospective study. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):455‐459.
Falciglia M, Freyberg RW, Almenoff PL, D'Alessio DA, Render ML. Hyperglycemia‐related mortality in critically ill patients varies with admission diagnosis. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(12):3001‐3009.
Honarmand K, Sirimaturos M, Hirshberg EL, et al. Society of critical care medicine guidelines on glycemic control for critically ill children and adults 2024. Crit Care Med. 2024;52(4):e161‐e181.
Boom DT, Sechterberger MK, Rijkenberg S, et al. Insulin treatment guided by subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring compared to frequent point‐of‐care measurement in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2014;18(4):453.
Singh LG, Satyarengga M, Marcano I, et al. Reducing inpatient hypoglycemia in the general wards using real‐time continuous glucose monitoring: the glucose telemetry system, a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(11):2736‐2743.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344‐349.
Granholm A, Perner A, Krag M, et al. Development and internal validation of the simplified mortality score for the intensive care unit (SMS‐ICU). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(3):336‐346.
Granholm A, Perner A, Krag M, et al. External validation of the simplified mortality score for the intensive care unit (SMS‐ICU). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(9):1216‐1224.
Lee TF, Drake SM, Roberts GW, et al. Relative hyperglycemia is an independent determinant of in‐hospital mortality in patients with critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(2):e115‐e122.
Krinsley JS, Rule P, Pappy L, et al. The interaction of acute and chronic glycemia on the relationship of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glucose variability to mortality in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(12):1744‐1751.
Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Egi M, et al. Stress hyperlactatemia modifies the relationship between stress hyperglycemia and outcome: a retrospective observational study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(6):1379‐1385.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377‐381.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.

Auteurs

Milda Grigonyte-Daraskeviciene (M)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Morten Hylander Møller (MH)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen (BS)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Morten Heiberg Bestle (MH)

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Christian Gantzel Nielsen (CG)

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-North Zealand, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Anders Perner (A)

Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH