The use of advance directives for autonomy in dementia care: A scoping meta-review and thematic synthesis.

Advance care planning Advance directives Autonomy Dementia Review of reviews Scoping review

Journal

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics
ISSN: 1872-6976
Titre abrégé: Arch Gerontol Geriatr
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214379

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 May 2024
Historique:
received: 23 02 2024
revised: 08 05 2024
accepted: 20 05 2024
medline: 21 6 2024
pubmed: 21 6 2024
entrez: 20 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Dementia may reduce individuals' capacity for autonomy and decision-making competence. Advance directives are subject to theoretical bioethical debate as tools to safeguard or extend autonomy in dementia. However, the extent and manner in which advance directives are actually used for these purposes in practice remain less examined. We aimed to examine how advance directives are used as tools for individual autonomy in dementia care. We systematically searched six databases and performed a thematic analysis and synthesis of included reviews based on an original model of six autonomy-relevant dimensions of advance directives. A total of 18 reviews met the inclusion criteria. We identified 12 themes across six dimensions. We found a lack of knowledge integration on the actual use of advance directives for autonomy in dementia care. Evidence suggests significant variation in the autonomy-relevant dimensions of advance directives, with a tendency towards an inconsistent or low level of implementation as a tool for autonomy. Further reviews and primary studies on all aspects of the use of advance directives for autonomy in dementia care would contribute significantly to dementia research and practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38901137
pii: S0167-4943(24)00174-2
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2024.105498
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105498

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Sigurd Lauridsen reports financial support was provided by Velux Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Simon Kinch (S)

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: skrv@sdu.dk.

Frederik Schou-Juul (F)

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sofie Smedegaard Skov (SS)

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Nana Cecilie Halmsted Kongsholm (NCH)

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sigurd Lauridsen (S)

National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH