Epicardial pacemaker placement is associated with low complication rate and improved quality of life in dogs.

artificial cardiac pacing canine epicardial pacemaker quality of life

Journal

Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
ISSN: 1943-569X
Titre abrégé: J Am Vet Med Assoc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7503067

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 03 04 2024
accepted: 22 05 2024
medline: 21 6 2024
pubmed: 21 6 2024
entrez: 20 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To describe complications and outcomes in dogs undergoing epicardial pacemaker (EP) implantation, identify factors associated with survival, and investigate improvement in clinical signs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following surgery. 52 client-owned dogs that underwent EP placement. Medical records of 4 UK-based referral hospitals were searched and data reviewed retrospectively between July 2010 and December 2022. Factors contributing to outcomes after EP placement were assessed. The primary reasons for referral included collapsing/syncopal episodes (n = 36), exercise intolerance (15), and significant bradycardia (46). Third-degree atrioventricular block (39/52 [75%]) was the predominant indication for pacemaker placement, and common reasons for EP placement included previous transvenous pacemaker dislodgment/loss of capture (n = 12) and small body size (10). Intra- and postoperative complications were documented in 11% and 23% of dogs, respectively. Overall, 96% of dogs survived to discharge, and median follow-up time was 462 days (range, 31 to 3,139 days). Presence of coexistent myocardial or valvular disease at the time of EP implantation was associated with a reduced survival. Owners reported decreased clinical signs, increased activity levels, and improved HRQoL. Epicardial pacemaker implantation is a valuable option for dogs requiring artificial cardiac pacing. Complications were common but did not impact the overall outcome. Dogs with a coexisting cardiac pathology had a shorter life expectancy after EP placement, but their HRQoL appeared to be good, with an improvement in clinical signs and increased activity levels.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38901451
doi: 10.2460/javma.24.04.0232
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Auteurs

Matteo Rossanese (M)

1Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.

Dan Brockman (D)

1Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.

Guillaume Chanoit (G)

2Langford Vets Small Animal Referral Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Jilli Crosby (J)

1Department of Clinical Science and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, UK.

Peter Scott (P)

2Langford Vets Small Animal Referral Hospital, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Benito de la Puerta (B)

3North Down Specialist Referrals, Bletchingley, UK.

Joanna Dukes-McEwan (J)

4Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.

Mattia Basili (M)

4Small Animal Teaching Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.

Classifications MeSH