Association between skin suture devices and incidence of incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Absorbable sutures
Gastrointestinal surgery
Network meta-analysis
Subcuticular sutures
Surgical site infection
Systematic review
Journal
The Journal of hospital infection
ISSN: 1532-2939
Titre abrégé: J Hosp Infect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8007166
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jun 2024
18 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
06
03
2024
revised:
05
04
2024
accepted:
06
04
2024
medline:
21
6
2024
pubmed:
21
6
2024
entrez:
20
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
We aimed to compare which suture devices could reduce the incidence of incisional surgical site infections (SSIs) after gastrointestinal surgery using a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The CENTRAL, PubMed, and ICHUSHI-Web databases were searched from January 1st, 2000, to December 31st, 2022, for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the incidence of incisional SSI after gastrointestinal surgery among patients treated with different surgical suture devices, including non-absorbable sutures, absorbable sutures, skin staplers, and tissue adhesives (last searched in August 23th 2023). The risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. To estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) for each comparison, we employed a fixed-effect inverse-variance model based on the Mantel-Haenszel approach. This study was registered in PROSPERO and supported in part by the Japan Surgical Infection Society. A total of 18 RCTs with 5,496 patients were included in this study. The overall SSIs in absorbable sutures were significantly lower than the ones in skin staplers (OR: 0.77; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.63-0.95) and non-absorbable sutures (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.99). On the other hand, SSIs in absorbable sutures were not statistically different from the SSIs in tissue adhesive. The highest P-score was 0.91 for absorbable sutures. A funnel plot for estimating the heterogeneity of the studies revealed that a publication bias would be minimal (Egger test, P = 0.271). This study showed that absorbable sutures reduced incisional SSIs in gastrointestinal surgical operations compared to any other suture devices.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38901769
pii: S0195-6701(24)00205-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.04.029
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.