Rehabilitation Treatment of a Patient With Total Humeral Endoprosthetic Replacement.

abduction brace articular range of motion chondrosarcoma rehabilitation treatment return to work total humeral endoprosthetic replacement

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
accepted: 19 05 2024
medline: 21 6 2024
pubmed: 21 6 2024
entrez: 21 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Total humeral endoprosthetic replacement (THR) is a rare surgery for malignant humeral bone tumors. Studies focusing on its surgical methods and functional status are limited. Furthermore, rehabilitation treatment after THR has not been reported. Therefore, this case report aimed to investigate its postoperative rehabilitation treatment and reinstatement. A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with chondrosarcoma of her left humerus. THR was performed the day following patient admission. The wide resection caused the loss of her left shoulder motor function. She had a left ulnar nerve disorder and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rehabilitation treatments such as joint range of motion training were initiated on postoperative day (POD) 1. We designed a shoulder abductor brace to maintain her left shoulder in an abducted and flexed position so she could use her left hand effectively. The manual muscle testing scores for elbow joint movements gradually improved. On POD47, she was transferred to a convalescent rehabilitation hospital to receive training in activities of daily living and barber work. The patient was discharged on POD107. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 86.2 (POD7) to 17.2 (POD107). She continued outpatient rehabilitation and reinstated work on POD143. The use of a brace and seamless rehabilitation from the acute phase to convalescence and community-based rehabilitation enabled the patient with THR to return to work. This study suggests that precise assessment of the disorders and consecutive rehabilitation treatment with a brace should be considered after THR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38903370
doi: 10.7759/cureus.60716
pmc: PMC11187010
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e60716

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Choda et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Naoki Choda (N)

Rehabilitation Center, Hyogo Medical University Sasayama Medical Center, Tambasasayama, JPN.
Department of General Medicine and Community Health Science, Hyogo Medical University Sasayama Medical Center, Tambasasayama, JPN.

Yoshihiro Kanata (Y)

Rehabilitation Center, Hyogo Medical University Sasayama Medical Center, Tambasasayama, JPN.
Department of General Medicine and Community Health Science, Hyogo Medical University Sasayama Medical Center, Tambasasayama, JPN.

Norihiko Kodama (N)

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, JPN.

Saya Iwasa (S)

Rehabilitation Center, Hyogo Medical University Sasayama Medical Center, Tambasasayama, JPN.
Department of General Medicine and Community Health Science, Hyogo Medical University Sasayama Medical Center, Tambasasayama, JPN.

Takayuki Kawaguchi (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, JPN.

Yuki Uchiyama (Y)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, JPN.

Hiroyuki Futani (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, JPN.

Kazuhisa Domen (K)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, JPN.

Classifications MeSH