Usefulness of a long hood for the detection of bleeding sites in colonic diverticular hemorrhage: A randomized controlled trial.

colonic diverticular hemorrhage colorectal diverticulosis long hood stigmata of recent hemorrhage

Journal

JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 2397-9070
Titre abrégé: JGH Open
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101730833

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 08 04 2024
revised: 30 04 2024
accepted: 08 05 2024
medline: 21 6 2024
pubmed: 21 6 2024
entrez: 21 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of a hood at the tip of a colonoscope enables aspiration, inversion of the diverticulum, and observation of the inside of the diverticulum. In most previous studies, a short hood was used; however, observation of the diverticulum is often inadequate. Long food is promising by previous research, but it was a retrospective study using propensity matching and has some limitations. We compared the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) between the long and standard hoods in cases of suspected colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) to confirm the usefulness of long hood by prospective randomized controlled trial. Eighty patients (42 in the long hood group [L group] and 38 in the short hood group [S group]) who visited the Saitama Medical University Hospital and Tokai University Hachioji Hospital between December 2018 and July 2021 with a chief complaint of bloody stool and suspected CDH, based on the clinical course and imaging studies, were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the L or S group. Regarding patient background, age was significantly higher in the L group; however, no significant differences were found in medical history or history of antithrombotic medication or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Identification rate of SRH was significantly higher in the L group (58.5%, 24/42 patients) than in the S group (26.3%, 10/38 patients) ( A long hood was more useful compared with a short hood in identifying SRH of CDH (UMIN000034603).

Sections du résumé

Background and Aim UNASSIGNED
The use of a hood at the tip of a colonoscope enables aspiration, inversion of the diverticulum, and observation of the inside of the diverticulum. In most previous studies, a short hood was used; however, observation of the diverticulum is often inadequate. Long food is promising by previous research, but it was a retrospective study using propensity matching and has some limitations. We compared the identification rate of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) between the long and standard hoods in cases of suspected colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) to confirm the usefulness of long hood by prospective randomized controlled trial.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Eighty patients (42 in the long hood group [L group] and 38 in the short hood group [S group]) who visited the Saitama Medical University Hospital and Tokai University Hachioji Hospital between December 2018 and July 2021 with a chief complaint of bloody stool and suspected CDH, based on the clinical course and imaging studies, were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the L or S group.
Results UNASSIGNED
Regarding patient background, age was significantly higher in the L group; however, no significant differences were found in medical history or history of antithrombotic medication or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Identification rate of SRH was significantly higher in the L group (58.5%, 24/42 patients) than in the S group (26.3%, 10/38 patients) (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
A long hood was more useful compared with a short hood in identifying SRH of CDH (UMIN000034603).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38903485
doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13099
pii: JGH313099
pmc: PMC11187950
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e13099

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Auteurs

Rie Shiomi (R)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Junko Nagata (J)

Department of Gastroenterology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Yoshikazu Tsuzuki (Y)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Masashi Yokota (M)

Department of Gastroenterology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Hisashi Matsumoto (H)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Kazuya Miyaguchi (K)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Hideki Ohgo (H)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Shingo Tsuda (S)

Department of Gastroenterology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Hiroyuki Ito (H)

Department of Gastroenterology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Seiichiro Kojima (S)

Department of Gastroenterology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Nobutaka Hirooka (N)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Hidetomo Nakamoto (H)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Takayoshi Suzuki (T)

Department of Gastroenterology Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Hiroyuki Imaeda (H)

Department of General Internal Medicine Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University Saitama Japan.

Classifications MeSH