Health behavior interventions among people with lower socio-economic position: a scoping review of behavior change techniques and effectiveness.

health behavior interventions; behavior change techniques (BCTs); socio-economic position (SEP); healthy eating; scoping review

Journal

Health psychology and behavioral medicine
ISSN: 2164-2850
Titre abrégé: Health Psychol Behav Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101624393

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
medline: 21 6 2024
pubmed: 21 6 2024
entrez: 21 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Behavior change interventions can unintendedly widen existing socio-economic health inequalities. Understanding why interventions are (in)effective among people with lower socio-economic position (SEP) is essential. Therefore, this scoping review aims to describe what is reported about the behavior change techniques (BCTs) applied within interventions and their effectiveness in encouraging physical activity and healthy eating, and reducing smoking and alcohol consumption according to SEP. A systematic search was conducted in 12 electronic databases, and 151 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included and coded for health behavioral outcomes, SEP-operationalization, BCTs (type and number) and effectiveness. Findings suggest that approaches for measuring, defining and substantiating lower SEP vary. Current studies of behavior change interventions for people of different SEP do not systematically identify BCTs, making systematic evaluation of BCT effectiveness impossible. The effectiveness of interventions is mainly evaluated by overall intervention outcomes and SEP-moderation effects are mostly not assessed. Using different SEP-operationalizations and not specifying BCTs hampers systematic evidence accumulation regarding effective (combinations of) BCTs for the low SEP population. To learn which BCTs effectively improve health behaviors among people with lower SEP, future intervention developers should justify how SEP is operationalized and must systematically describe and examine BCTs.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Behavior change interventions can unintendedly widen existing socio-economic health inequalities. Understanding why interventions are (in)effective among people with lower socio-economic position (SEP) is essential. Therefore, this scoping review aims to describe what is reported about the behavior change techniques (BCTs) applied within interventions and their effectiveness in encouraging physical activity and healthy eating, and reducing smoking and alcohol consumption according to SEP.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A systematic search was conducted in 12 electronic databases, and 151 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included and coded for health behavioral outcomes, SEP-operationalization, BCTs (type and number) and effectiveness.
Results UNASSIGNED
Findings suggest that approaches for measuring, defining and substantiating lower SEP vary. Current studies of behavior change interventions for people of different SEP do not systematically identify BCTs, making systematic evaluation of BCT effectiveness impossible. The effectiveness of interventions is mainly evaluated by overall intervention outcomes and SEP-moderation effects are mostly not assessed.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Using different SEP-operationalizations and not specifying BCTs hampers systematic evidence accumulation regarding effective (combinations of) BCTs for the low SEP population. To learn which BCTs effectively improve health behaviors among people with lower SEP, future intervention developers should justify how SEP is operationalized and must systematically describe and examine BCTs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38903803
doi: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2365931
pii: 2365931
pmc: PMC11188964
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

2365931

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Auteurs

Loes van den Bekerom (L)

Health Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands.

Laurens C van Gestel (LC)

Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Jan W Schoones (JW)

Directorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Jet Bussemaker (J)

Health Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands.
The Institute of Public Administration, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Marieke A Adriaanse (MA)

Health Campus The Hague/Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague/Leiden, the Netherlands.
Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH