A Machine Learning Algorithm Avoids Unnecessary Paracentesis for Exclusion of SBP in Cirrhosis in Resource-Limited Settings.

Infections Machine Learning Predictive Model Resource-limited X-gradient boost

Journal

Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
ISSN: 1542-7714
Titre abrégé: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101160775

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 01 04 2024
revised: 04 06 2024
accepted: 12 06 2024
medline: 22 6 2024
pubmed: 22 6 2024
entrez: 21 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Despite the poor prognosis associated with missed or delayed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) diagnosis, <15% get timely paracentesis, which persists despite guidelines/education in the US. Measures to exclude SBP non-invasively where timely paracentesis cannot be performed could streamline this burden. Using Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse (VHA-CDW) we included cirrhosis patients between 2009-2019 who underwent timely paracentesis and collected relevant clinical information (demographics, cirrhosis severity, medications, vitals, and comorbidities). XGBoost-models were trained on 75% of the primary cohort, with 25% reserved for testing. The final model was further validated in two cohorts: Validation cohort #1: In VHA-CDW, those without prior SBP who received 2 Negative predictive values (NPV) at 5,10 & 15% probability cutoffs were examined. Primary cohort: n=9,643 (mean age 63.1±8.7 years, 97.2% men, SBP:15.0%) received first early paracentesis. Testing-set NPVs for SBP were 96.5%, 93.0% and 91.6% at the 5%, 10% and 15% probability thresholds respectively. In Validation cohort #1: n=2844 (mean age 63.14±8.37 years, 97.1% male, SBP: 9.7%) with NPVs were 98.8%, 95.3% and 94.5%. In Validation cohort #2: n=276 (mean age 56.08±9.09, 59.6% male, SBP: 7.6%) with NPVs were 100%, 98.9% and 98.0% The final ML model showed the greatest net benefit on decision-curve analyses. A machine learning model generated using routinely collected variables excluded SBP with high negative predictive value. Applying this model could ease the need to provide paracentesis in resource-limited settings by excluding those unlikely to have SBP.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Despite the poor prognosis associated with missed or delayed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) diagnosis, <15% get timely paracentesis, which persists despite guidelines/education in the US. Measures to exclude SBP non-invasively where timely paracentesis cannot be performed could streamline this burden.
METHODS METHODS
Using Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse (VHA-CDW) we included cirrhosis patients between 2009-2019 who underwent timely paracentesis and collected relevant clinical information (demographics, cirrhosis severity, medications, vitals, and comorbidities). XGBoost-models were trained on 75% of the primary cohort, with 25% reserved for testing. The final model was further validated in two cohorts: Validation cohort #1: In VHA-CDW, those without prior SBP who received 2
RESULTS RESULTS
Negative predictive values (NPV) at 5,10 & 15% probability cutoffs were examined. Primary cohort: n=9,643 (mean age 63.1±8.7 years, 97.2% men, SBP:15.0%) received first early paracentesis. Testing-set NPVs for SBP were 96.5%, 93.0% and 91.6% at the 5%, 10% and 15% probability thresholds respectively. In Validation cohort #1: n=2844 (mean age 63.14±8.37 years, 97.1% male, SBP: 9.7%) with NPVs were 98.8%, 95.3% and 94.5%. In Validation cohort #2: n=276 (mean age 56.08±9.09, 59.6% male, SBP: 7.6%) with NPVs were 100%, 98.9% and 98.0% The final ML model showed the greatest net benefit on decision-curve analyses.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
A machine learning model generated using routinely collected variables excluded SBP with high negative predictive value. Applying this model could ease the need to provide paracentesis in resource-limited settings by excluding those unlikely to have SBP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38906441
pii: S1542-3565(24)00555-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.015
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Scott Silvey (S)

Department of Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Nilang Patel (N)

Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.

Jinze Liu (J)

Department of Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.

Asiya Tafader (A)

Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.

Mahum Nadeem (M)

Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.

Galvin Dhaliwal (G)

Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.

Jacqueline G O'Leary (JG)

Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern and Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.

Heather Patton (H)

Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego and San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, California.

Timothy R Morgan (TR)

Medical Service, VA Long Beach Healthcare Center, Long Beach, California.

Shari Rogal (S)

Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and Pittsburgh VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Jasmohan S Bajaj (JS)

Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia. Electronic address: jasmohan.bajaj@vcuhealth.org.

Classifications MeSH