iVOMS: Instrumented Vestibular / Ocular motor screen in healthy controls and mild traumatic brain injury.
Biomarker
Eye movement
Eye-tracking
Ocular
VOMS
Vestibular
mTBI
Journal
Medical engineering & physics
ISSN: 1873-4030
Titre abrégé: Med Eng Phys
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9422753
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
19
10
2023
revised:
12
04
2024
accepted:
06
05
2024
medline:
22
6
2024
pubmed:
22
6
2024
entrez:
21
6
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Objective Vestibular/ocular deficits occur with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The vestibular/ocular motor screening (VOMS) tool is used to assess individuals post-mTBI, which primarily relies upon subjective self-reported symptoms. Instrumenting the VOMS (iVOMS) with technology may allow for more objective assessment post-mTBI, which reflects actual task performance. This study aimed to validate the iVOMS analytically and clinically in mTBI and controls. Methods Seventy-nine people with sub-acute mTBI (<12 weeks post-injury) and forty-four healthy control participants performed the VOMS whilst wearing a mobile eye-tracking on a one-off visit. People with mTBI were included if they were within 12 weeks of a physician diagnosis. Participants were excluded if they had any musculoskeletal, neurological or sensory deficits which could explain dysfunction. A series of custom-made eye tracking algorithms were used to assess recorded eye-movements. Results The iVOMS was analytically valid compared to the reference (ICC
Identifiants
pubmed: 38906567
pii: S1350-4533(24)00081-X
doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104180
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104180Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors confirm there are no competing interests. All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.