Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of The Aorta (REBOA) And Mortality in Hemorrhagic Shock Associated with Severe Pelvic Fracture: a National Data Analysis.
Humans
Shock, Hemorrhagic
/ etiology
Balloon Occlusion
/ methods
Male
Female
Adult
Pelvic Bones
/ injuries
Middle Aged
Resuscitation
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Fractures, Bone
/ complications
Propensity Score
Endovascular Procedures
/ methods
Aorta
/ injuries
Injury Severity Score
Abbreviated Injury Scale
Hemorrhagic shock
REBOA
Severe pelvic fracture
Journal
BMC emergency medicine
ISSN: 1471-227X
Titre abrégé: BMC Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2024
24 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
21
08
2023
accepted:
07
06
2024
medline:
24
6
2024
pubmed:
24
6
2024
entrez:
23
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mortality of patients who received Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of The Aorta (REBOA) in severe pelvic fracture with hemorrhagic shock. The American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017-2019 was accessed for the study. The study included all patients aged 15 years and older who sustained severe pelvic fractures, defined as an injury with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score of ≥ 3, and who presented with the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) of < 90 mmHg. Patients with severe brain injury were excluded from the study. Propensity score matching was used to compare the patients who received REBOA with similar characteristics to patients who did not receive REBOA. Out of 3,186 patients who qualified for the study, 35(1.1%) patients received REBOA for an ongoing hemorrhagic shock with severe pelvic fracture. The propensity matching created 35 pairs of patients. The pair-matched analysis showed no significant differences between the group who received REBOA and the group that did not receive REBOA regarding patients' demography, injury severity, severity of pelvic fractures, lowest blood pressure at initial assessment and laparotomies. There was no significant difference found between REBOA versus no REBOA group in overall in-hospital mortality (34.3% vs. 28.6, P = 0.789). Our study did not identify any mortality advantage in patients who received REBOA in hemorrhagic shock associated with severe pelvic fracture compared to a similar cohort of patients who did not receive REBOA. A larger sample size prospective study is needed to validate our results. Level of Evidence IV.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mortality of patients who received Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of The Aorta (REBOA) in severe pelvic fracture with hemorrhagic shock.
METHODS
METHODS
The American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017-2019 was accessed for the study. The study included all patients aged 15 years and older who sustained severe pelvic fractures, defined as an injury with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score of ≥ 3, and who presented with the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) of < 90 mmHg. Patients with severe brain injury were excluded from the study. Propensity score matching was used to compare the patients who received REBOA with similar characteristics to patients who did not receive REBOA.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 3,186 patients who qualified for the study, 35(1.1%) patients received REBOA for an ongoing hemorrhagic shock with severe pelvic fracture. The propensity matching created 35 pairs of patients. The pair-matched analysis showed no significant differences between the group who received REBOA and the group that did not receive REBOA regarding patients' demography, injury severity, severity of pelvic fractures, lowest blood pressure at initial assessment and laparotomies. There was no significant difference found between REBOA versus no REBOA group in overall in-hospital mortality (34.3% vs. 28.6, P = 0.789).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study did not identify any mortality advantage in patients who received REBOA in hemorrhagic shock associated with severe pelvic fracture compared to a similar cohort of patients who did not receive REBOA. A larger sample size prospective study is needed to validate our results.
CASE-CONTROL RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
UNASSIGNED
Level of Evidence IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38910235
doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01020-y
pii: 10.1186/s12873-024-01020-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, Suedkamp NP, Koestler W, Schmal H. Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J Trauma. 2008;64(2):449–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31815982b1 . (PMID: 18301214).
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31815982b1
pubmed: 18301214
Chong KH, DeCoster T, Osler T, Robinson B. Pelvic fractures and mortality. Iowa Orthop J. 1997;17:110–4.
pubmed: 9234982
pmcid: 2378101
Rothenberger DA, Fischer RP, Strate RG, Velasco R, Perry JF Jr. The mortality associated with pelvic fractures. Surgery. 1978;84(3):356–61 (PMID: 684627).
pubmed: 684627
Schwab CW, Gore DMAST. Medical anti-shock trousers. Surg Annu. 1983;15:41–59.
pubmed: 6353638
Cutlet BS, Dagget WM. Application of the G-suit to the control of haemorrhage in massive trauma. Ann Surg. 1972;173:511–4.
Hsu SD, Chen CJ, Chou YC, Wang SH, Chan DC. Effect of Early Pelvic Binder Use in the Emergency Management of Suspected Pelvic Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101217 . (Published 2017 Oct 12).
doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101217
pubmed: 29023379
pmcid: 5664718
Cothren CC, Osborn PM, Moore EE, Morgan SJ, Johnson JL, Smith WR. Preperitonal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a paradigm shift. J Trauma. 2007;62(4):834–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c7632 . (discussion 839-42 PMID: 17426537).
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803c7632
pubmed: 17426537
Vaidya R, Waldron J, Scott A, Nasr K. Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(4):e68–76. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00600 .
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00600
pubmed: 29351135
pmcid: 5794236
Ganz R, et al. The antishock pelvic clamp. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;267:71–8.
doi: 10.1097/00003086-199106000-00009
Pohlemann T, et al. Severe pelvic injury with pelvic mass hemorrhage: determining severity of hemorrhage and clinical experience with emergency stabilization. Unfallchirurg. 1996;99(10):734–43.
doi: 10.1007/s001130050049
pubmed: 9005561
Heini PF, Witt J, Ganz R. The pelvic C-clamp for the emergency treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries. A report on clinical experience of 30 cases. Injury. 1996;27 Suppl 1:S-a38-45.
doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(96)90110-2
Tscherne H, et al. Crush injuries of the pelvis. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(4):276–82.
doi: 10.1080/110241500750009078
pubmed: 10817320
Hauschild O, et al. Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register. J Trauma. 2008;64(2):449–55.
pubmed: 18301214
Martinelli T, Thony F, Decléty P, Sengel C, Broux C, Tonetti J, Payen JF, Ferretti G. Intra-aortic balloon occlusion to salvage patients with life-threatening hemorrhagic shocks from pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 2010;68(4):942–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40579 . (PMID: 20173661).
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40579
pubmed: 20173661
Moore LJ, Brenner M, Kozar RA, Pasley J, Wade CE, Baraniuk MS, Scalea T, Holcomb JB. Implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as an alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(4):523–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000809 . (discussion 530-2. PMID: 26402524).
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000809
pubmed: 26402524
Brenner M, Inaba K, Aiolfi A, DuBose J, Fabian T, Bee T, Holcomb JB, Moore L, Skarupa D, Scalea TM, AAST AORTA Study Group. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta and Resuscitative Thoracotomy in Select Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock: Early Results from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma’s Aortic Occlusion in Resuscitation for Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Registry. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(5):730–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.044 . (Epub 2018 Feb 6. Erratum in: J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):484. PMID: 29421694).
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.044
pubmed: 29421694
Khalid S, Khatri M, Siddiqui MS, Ahmed J. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of Aorta Versus Aortic Cross-Clamping by Thoracotomy for Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis. J Surg Res. 2022;270:252–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.016 . (Epub 2021 Oct 26 PMID: 34715536).
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.016
pubmed: 34715536
Jansen JO, Hudson J, Cochran C, MacLennan G, Lendrum R, Sadek S, Gillies K, Cotton S, Kennedy C, Boyers D, Ferry G, Lawrie L, Nath M, Wileman S, Forrest M, Brohi K, Harris T, Lecky F, Moran C, Morrison JJ, Norrie J, Paterson A, Tai N, Welch N, Campbell MK, UK-REBOA Study Group, Aylwin C, Bew D, Brooks A, Chinery J, Cowlam T, Frith D, George A, Hudson A, Johnstone P, Mahmood A, Novak A, O’Meara M, Reid S, Sattout A, Smith C, Stansfield T, Thompson J. Emergency Department Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Trauma Patients With Exsanguinating Hemorrhage: The UK-REBOA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;330(19):1862–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.20850 . (PMID: 37824132; PMCID: PMC10570916).
doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20850
pubmed: 37824132
pmcid: 10570916
Asmar S, Bible L, Chehab M, Tang A, Khurrum M, Douglas M, Castanon L, Kulvatunyou N, Joseph B. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta vs Pre-Peritoneal Packing in Patients with Pelvic Fracture. J Am Coll Surg. 2021;232(1):17-26e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.763 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.763
pubmed: 33022396
Pieper A, Thony F, Brun J, Rodiere M, Boussat B, Arvieux C, Tonetti J, Payen JF, Bouzat P. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for pelvic blunt trauma and life-threatening hemorrhage: A 20-year experience in a Level I trauma center. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(3):449–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001794 .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001794
pubmed: 29298239
Chien CY, Lewis MR, Dilday J, Biswas S, Luo Y, Demetriades D. Worse outcomes with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in severe pelvic fracture: A matched cohort study. Am J Surg. 2023;225(2):414–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.057 . (Epub 2022 Oct 10 PMID: 36253317).
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.057
pubmed: 36253317
Anand T, El-Qawaqzeh K, Nelson A, et al. Association Between Hemorrhage Control Interventions and Mortality in US Trauma Patients With Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5772 .
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5772
pubmed: 36449300
Daniel E. Ho, Kosuke Imai, Gary King, Elizabeth A. Stuart (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference. J Stat Software. 42(8):1–28. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v42/i08/
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ .
Austin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 .
doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
pubmed: 21818162
pmcid: 3144483
Borger van der Burg, B.L.S., van Dongen, T.T.C.F., Morrison, J.J. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of major exsanguination. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 44, 535–550 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-018-0959-y
Joseph B, Zeeshan M, Sakran JV, et al. Nationwide Analysis of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Civilian Trauma. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(6):500–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0096 .
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0096
pubmed: 30892574
pmcid: 6584250
Elkbuli A, Kinslow K, Sen-Crowe B, Liu H, McKenney M, Ang D. Outcomes of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) utilization in trauma patients with and without traumatic brain injuries: A national analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program data set. Surgery. 2021;1:284–90.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.043